53
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Janus kinase-targeting therapies in rheumatology: a mechanisms-based approach

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The four Janus kinase (JAK) proteins and seven signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) transcription factors mediate intracellular signal transduction downstream of cytokine receptors, which are implicated in the pathology of autoimmune, allergic and inflammatory diseases. Development of targeted small-molecule therapies such as JAK inhibitors, which have varied selective inhibitory profiles, has enabled a paradigm shift in the treatment of diverse disorders. JAK inhibitors suppress intracellular signalling mediated by multiple cytokines involved in the pathological processes of rheumatoid arthritis and many other immune and inflammatory diseases, and therefore have the capacity to target multiple aspects of those diseases. In addition to rheumatoid arthritis, JAK inhibition has potential for treatment of autoimmune diseases including systemic lupus erythematosus, spondyloarthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and alopecia areata, in which stimulation of innate immunity activates adaptive immunity, leading to generation of autoreactive T cells and activation and differentiation of B cells. JAK inhibitors are also effective in the treatment of allergic disorders, such as atopic dermatitis, and can even be used for the COVID-19-related cytokine storm. Mechanism-based treatments targeting JAK–STAT pathways have the potential to provide positive outcomes by minimizing the use of glucocorticoids and/or non-specific immunosuppressants in the treatment of systemic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.

          Abstract

          Janus kinase inhibition modulates a range of immune and inflammatory processes. In this Review, the authors discuss progress in the therapeutic use of Janus kinase inhibitors in autoimmune rheumatic diseases, with a focus on their disease-specific mechanisms of action.

          Key points

          • Mechanism-based targeting of receptor-mediated signalling via Janus kinase (JAK)–signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathways in refractory systemic autoimmune diseases can potentially minimize glucocorticoid and non-specific immunosuppressant use.

          • JAK–STAT pathways are important for cellular interaction during rheumatoid arthritis pathological processes, causing synovial inflammation, autoantibody production, synovial proliferation and joint destruction, which are potential targets for JAK inhibition.

          • Inflammatory processes involving JAK–STAT signalling pathways are involved in the pathology of spondyloarthritis (including psoriatic arthritis), and are targets for JAK inhibition.

          • Innate immune system cytokines signal through JAK–STAT to adaptive immune mechanisms involving autoreactive T cells, B cell activation and autoantibody production, which are potential therapeutic targets in systemic lupus erythematosus.

          • Cytokines contribute to various pathophysiological mechanisms of organ-specific autoimmune diseases, and JAK inhibitors can target multiple aspects of inflammatory bowel diseases, alopecia, allergic disorders and cytokine storm.

          • Use of JAK inhibitors requires careful consideration of their multi-target effects, with adequate prior screening and regularly planned monitoring during treatment for infection, cardiovascular disorders, thrombosis and malignancy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references111

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Rheumatoid arthritis.

          Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory joint disease, which can cause cartilage and bone damage as well as disability. Early diagnosis is key to optimal therapeutic success, particularly in patients with well-characterised risk factors for poor outcomes such as high disease activity, presence of autoantibodies, and early joint damage. Treatment algorithms involve measuring disease activity with composite indices, applying a treatment-to-target strategy, and use of conventional, biological, and newz non-biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. After the treatment target of stringent remission (or at least low disease activity) is maintained, dose reduction should be attempted. Although the prospects for most patients are now favourable, many still do not respond to current therapies. Accordingly, new therapies are urgently required. In this Seminar, we describe current insights into genetics and aetiology, pathophysiology, epidemiology, assessment, therapeutic agents, and treatment strategies together with unmet needs of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update

            To provide an update of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management recommendations to account for the most recent developments in the field. An international task force considered new evidence supporting or contradicting previous recommendations and novel therapies and strategic insights based on two systematic literature searches on efficacy and safety of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) since the last update (2016) until 2019. A predefined voting process was applied, current levels of evidence and strengths of recommendation were assigned and participants ultimately voted independently on their level of agreement with each of the items. The task force agreed on 5 overarching principles and 12 recommendations concerning use of conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs (methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide, sulfasalazine); glucocorticoids (GCs); biological (b) DMARDs (tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab), abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, sarilumab and biosimilar (bs) DMARDs) and targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs (the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors tofacitinib, baricitinib, filgotinib, upadacitinib). Guidance on monotherapy, combination therapy, treatment strategies (treat-to-target) and tapering on sustained clinical remission is provided. Cost and sequencing of b/tsDMARDs are addressed. Initially, MTX plus GCs and upon insufficient response to this therapy within 3 to 6 months, stratification according to risk factors is recommended. With poor prognostic factors (presence of autoantibodies, high disease activity, early erosions or failure of two csDMARDs), any bDMARD or JAK inhibitor should be added to the csDMARD. If this fails, any other bDMARD (from another or the same class) or tsDMARD is recommended. On sustained remission, DMARDs may be tapered, but not be stopped. Levels of evidence and levels of agreement were mostly high. These updated EULAR recommendations provide consensus on the management of RA with respect to benefit, safety, preferences and cost.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Baricitinib plus Remdesivir for Hospitalized Adults with Covid-19

              Abstract Background Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is associated with dysregulated inflammation. The effects of combination treatment with baricitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, plus remdesivir are not known. Methods We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluating baricitinib plus remdesivir in hospitalized adults with Covid-19. All the patients received remdesivir (≤10 days) and either baricitinib (≤14 days) or placebo (control). The primary outcome was the time to recovery. The key secondary outcome was clinical status at day 15. Results A total of 1033 patients underwent randomization (with 515 assigned to combination treatment and 518 to control). Patients receiving baricitinib had a median time to recovery of 7 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 6 to 8), as compared with 8 days (95% CI, 7 to 9) with control (rate ratio for recovery, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.32; P=0.03), and a 30% higher odds of improvement in clinical status at day 15 (odds ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0 to 1.6). Patients receiving high-flow oxygen or noninvasive ventilation at enrollment had a time to recovery of 10 days with combination treatment and 18 days with control (rate ratio for recovery, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.10 to 2.08). The 28-day mortality was 5.1% in the combination group and 7.8% in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.09). Serious adverse events were less frequent in the combination group than in the control group (16.0% vs. 21.0%; difference, −5.0 percentage points; 95% CI, −9.8 to −0.3; P=0.03), as were new infections (5.9% vs. 11.2%; difference, −5.3 percentage points; 95% CI, −8.7 to −1.9; P=0.003). Conclusions Baricitinib plus remdesivir was superior to remdesivir alone in reducing recovery time and accelerating improvement in clinical status among patients with Covid-19, notably among those receiving high-flow oxygen or noninvasive ventilation. The combination was associated with fewer serious adverse events. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04401579.)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                tanaka@med.uoeh-u.ac.jp
                Journal
                Nat Rev Rheumatol
                Nat Rev Rheumatol
                Nature Reviews. Rheumatology
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                1759-4790
                1759-4804
                5 January 2022
                : 1-13
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.271052.3, ISNI 0000 0004 0374 5913, The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, , University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, ; Kitakyushu, Japan
                [2 ]GRID grid.420086.8, ISNI 0000 0001 2237 2479, Vasculitis Translational Research Program Systemic Autoimmunity Branch, , National Institute of Arthritis, Musculoskeletal, and Skin Diseases NIH, ; Bethesda, MD USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.420086.8, ISNI 0000 0001 2237 2479, Molecular Immunology & Inflammation Branch, and Translational Immunology Section, , National Institute of Arthritis & Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, NIH, ; Bethesda, MD USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0807-7139
                Article
                726
                10.1038/s41584-021-00726-8
                8730299
                34987201
                c459d15e-fc2e-4b62-a175-b572b1f1f520
                © Springer Nature Limited 2022

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 18 November 2021
                Categories
                Review Article

                therapeutics,rheumatology
                therapeutics, rheumatology

                Comments

                Comment on this article