12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cellular and Humoral Immunity to SARS‐CoV‐2 Infection in Multiple Sclerosis Patients on Ocrelizumab and Other Disease‐Modifying Therapies: A Multi‐Ethnic Observational Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          The objective of this study was to determine the impact of multiple sclerosis (MS) disease‐modifying therapies (DMTs) on the development of cellular and humoral immunity to severe acute respiratory syndrome‐coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection.

          Methods

          Patients with MS aged 18 to 60 years were evaluated for anti‐nucleocapsid and anti‐Spike receptor‐binding domain (RBD) antibody with electro‐chemiluminescence immunoassay; antibody responses to Spike protein, RBD, N‐terminal domain with multiepitope bead‐based immunoassays (MBI); live virus immunofluorescence‐based microneutralization assay; T‐cell responses to SARS‐CoV‐2 Spike using TruCulture enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); and IL‐2 and IFNγ ELISpot assays. Assay results were compared by DMT class. Spearman correlation and multivariate analyses were performed to examine associations between immunologic responses and infection severity.

          Results

          Between January 6, 2021, and July 21, 2021, 389 patients with MS were recruited (mean age 40.3 years; 74% women; 62% non‐White). Most common DMTs were ocrelizumab (OCR)—40%; natalizumab —17%, Sphingosine 1‐phosphate receptor (S1P) modulators −12%; and 15% untreated. One hundred seventy‐seven patients (46%) had laboratory evidence of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection; 130 had symptomatic infection, and 47 were asymptomatic. Antibody responses were markedly attenuated in OCR compared with other groups ( p ≤0.0001). T‐cell responses (IFNγ) were decreased in S1P ( p = 0.03), increased in natalizumab ( p <0.001), and similar in other DMTs, including OCR. Cellular and humoral responses were moderately correlated in both OCR ( r = 0.45, p = 0.0002) and non‐OCR ( r = 0.64, p <0.0001). Immune responses did not differ by race/ethnicity. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) clinical course was mostly non‐severe and similar across DMTs; 7% (9/130) were hospitalized.

          Interpretation

          DMTs had differential effects on humoral and cellular immune responses to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Immune responses did not correlate with COVID‐19 clinical severity in this relatively young and nondisabled group of patients with MS. ANN NEUROL 2022

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria

          The 2010 McDonald criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis are widely used in research and clinical practice. Scientific advances in the past 7 years suggest that they might no longer provide the most up-to-date guidance for clinicians and researchers. The International Panel on Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis reviewed the 2010 McDonald criteria and recommended revisions. The 2017 McDonald criteria continue to apply primarily to patients experiencing a typical clinically isolated syndrome, define what is needed to fulfil dissemination in time and space of lesions in the CNS, and stress the need for no better explanation for the presentation. The following changes were made: in patients with a typical clinically isolated syndrome and clinical or MRI demonstration of dissemination in space, the presence of CSF-specific oligoclonal bands allows a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis; symptomatic lesions can be used to demonstrate dissemination in space or time in patients with supratentorial, infratentorial, or spinal cord syndrome; and cortical lesions can be used to demonstrate dissemination in space. Research to further refine the criteria should focus on optic nerve involvement, validation in diverse populations, and incorporation of advanced imaging, neurophysiological, and body fluid markers.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Immunological memory to SARS-CoV-2 assessed for up to 8 months after infection

            Understanding immune memory to SARS-CoV-2 is critical for improving diagnostics and vaccines, and for assessing the likely future course of the COVID-19 pandemic. We analyzed multiple compartments of circulating immune memory to SARS-CoV-2 in 254 samples from 188 COVID-19 cases, including 43 samples at ≥ 6 months post-infection. IgG to the Spike protein was relatively stable over 6+ months. Spike-specific memory B cells were more abundant at 6 months than at 1 month post symptom onset. SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells declined with a half-life of 3-5 months. By studying antibody, memory B cell, CD4+ T cell, and CD8+ T cell memory to SARS-CoV-2 in an integrated manner, we observed that each component of SARS-CoV-2 immune memory exhibited distinct kinetics.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Antigen-specific adaptive immunity to SARS-CoV-2 in acute COVID-19 and associations with age and disease severity

              Limited knowledge is available on the relationship between antigen-specific immune responses and COVID-19 disease severity. We completed a combined examination of all three branches of adaptive immunity at the level of SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell and neutralizing antibody responses in acute and convalescent subjects. SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were each associated with milder disease. Coordinated SARS-CoV-2-specific adaptive immune responses were associated with milder disease, suggesting roles for both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in protective immunity in COVID-19. Notably, coordination of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-specific responses was disrupted in individuals > 65 years old. Scarcity of naive T cells was also associated with ageing and poor disease outcomes. A parsimonious explanation is that coordinated CD4+ T cell, CD8+ T cell, and antibody responses are protective, but uncoordinated responses frequently fail to control disease, with a connection between ageing and impaired adaptive immune responses to SARS-CoV-2.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                michelle.krogsgaard@nyulangone.org , ilya.kister@nyulangone.org
                michelle.krogsgaard@nyulangone.org
                gregg.silverman@nyulangone.org
                Journal
                Ann Neurol
                Ann Neurol
                10.1002/(ISSN)1531-8249
                ANA
                Annals of Neurology
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Hoboken, USA )
                0364-5134
                1531-8249
                01 April 2022
                01 April 2022
                : 10.1002/ana.26346
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Neurology, NYU Multiple Sclerosis Comprehensive Care Center New York University Grossman School of Medicine New York NY
                [ 2 ] Department of Pathology, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center New York University Grossman School of Medicine New York NY
                [ 3 ] Genentech, Inc. South San Francisco CA
                [ 4 ] Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Vaccine Center NYU Grossman School of Medicine New York NY
                [ 5 ] F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd Basel Switzerland
                [ 6 ] Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine New York University Grossman School of Medicine New York NY
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Address correspondence to Kister, Department of Neurology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016. E‐mail: ilya.kister@ 123456nyulangone.org and Krogsgaard, Department of Pathology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016. E‐mail: michelle.krogsgaard@ 123456nyulangone.org and

                Silverman, Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 435 E 30th Street, Room 517, New York, NY 10016. E‐mail: gregg.silverman@ 123456nyulangone.org

                [*]

                These authors should be considered co‐authors.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3549-949X
                Article
                ANA26346
                10.1002/ana.26346
                9082484
                35289960
                c4686080-a897-4b19-ac2d-3cbf29b77f52
                © 2022 The Authors. Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 03 March 2022
                : 24 December 2021
                : 04 March 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 3, Pages: 14, Words: 9532
                Funding
                Funded by: Genentech , doi 10.13039/100001127;
                Award ID: ML42929
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.5 mode:remove_FC converted:09.05.2022

                Neurology
                Neurology

                Comments

                Comment on this article