10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Current pharmacy practices in low- and middle-income countries; recommendations in response to the COVID-19 pandemic

      letter

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has spread worldwide, placing healthcare systems and healthcare professionals (HCPs) at risk. The number of countries with COVID-19, as well as the number of cases and deaths, continue to increase [1]. Healthcare systems are often unable to cope with the pandemic, with the added concern that increasing numbers of HCPs require medical care as the virus is transmitted from patient to caretaker [2]. Both private and government healthcare providers in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) often provide low-quality patient care, even for chronic infectious diseases such as tuberculosis and malaria [4]. According to the World Health Organization, about 2 billion individuals do not have access to essential medicines [5]. In LMICs, the lack of accessibility to medications may be due to several factors such as the unaffordability and/or unavailability of drugs and legal restrictions, and may be further complicated by inappropriate medicine use, prescribing by unauthorized individuals, and poor drug quality [6]. As LMICs largely rely on imported pharmaceuticals, the effects of a pandemic and the associated lockdown conditions may result in a lack of availability of essential medicines to treat other comorbidities [7]. During public health crises such as the current COVID-19 pandemic, pharmacists can provide many beneficial services, including counseling patients about methods to prevent, manage, and treat the infection, as well as reporting data to governmental and other healthcare organizations. However, the quality of pharmacy practice is often poor in LMICs, even though these are the countries most in need of such practices. This commentary focuses on current pharmacy practices in LMICs and recommends innovative and emerging pharmacy services such as telepharmacy to improve outcomes and responses related to COVID-19. Pharmacy services in low- and middle-income countries In LMICs, patients can easily access pharmacies for advice regarding minor illnesses and childhood concerns. However, many pharmacies in LMICs function below acceptable standards and focus more on profit than on patient care [3]. The pharmacists themselves are key to improving pharmacy practice. A pharmacist must have adequate knowledge about drugs and diseases and must be vigilant in providing required services. Based on a bibliometric review, Zaheer et al. reported that the gap between pharmacy education and practice in LMICs manifested as fewer research publications and inadequate pharmacy policy and practices, especially in Africa, Eastern Europe, and Central and South America [8]. LMICs face shortcomings in pharmacy services such as the quality of practice (dispensing, labeling, and counseling) as well as the sale of antibiotics or other drugs without prescription, lack of adherence to guidelines, inadequate knowledge of severe and acute diseases, and inconsistent supply of medicines [9]. The purpose of enhancing pharmacy services is to improve the prescribing, dispensing, and appropriate utilization of drugs by patients, but such innovations are highly dependent on the overall healthcare system. As well as providing healthcare facilities and implementing policies to improve health services, developed and high-income countries are generally the vanguard of pharmaceutical innovations. The situation differs in LMICs, where advances in pharmaceutical and therapeutic technologies and in policies that support public health are lacking [10]. Recommendations in response to the COVID-19 pandemic Given the generally poor pharmacy practices in LMICs, improvements in pharmaceutical services are urgently needed to fight the pandemic. The implementation and execution of innovative pharmaceutical services are also important. LMICs often have a lack of trained pharmacists and staff to manage pharmacy services at the community level. It is highly recommended that pharmacies provide services such as patient counseling, education, home care, and psychological support, that they maintain a supply of medicines to treat and manage acute and chronic diseases, and that they have an adequate supply of personal protective equipment (e.g., masks, sanitizers, and gloves) to use to prevent the spread of COVID-19 (Fig. 1) [11]. As inappropriate, misleading, and potentially dangerous information on the prevention and management of COVID-19 may be hazardous to the community, it is vital that community pharmacists are able to provide counseling and accurate information on preventive measures and guidelines. Fig. 1 Recommended pharmacy practices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic [11–13] Innovations in pharmaceutical services relating to telepharmacy (Fig. 1) are highly accepted worldwide due to the lockdown of cities, transportation, and markets. Individuals seek healthcare advice via telephone calls with trained pharmacists, who provide counseling, education, and pharmaceutical care. These innovative pharmacy practices not only reduce the number of individuals in markets, public places, and hospitals seeking healthcare, but they also reduce nosocomial infections. Pharmacists can improve teleservices by introducing easy-to-use applications that can meet the needs of the public [12]. Hospital and clinical pharmacists have the opportunity to establish a distinct role via the implementation of pharmacovigilance services and pharmaceutical care plans for patients with comorbidities and special populations, as well as by ensuring medicines are available to hospital patients (Fig. 1). Pharmacists also need to check for drug interactions, adverse reactions, mental well-being, and minor illnesses, ensure medication safety and effectiveness, and advise the general public about preventive measures [13]. Furthermore, pharmacists can contribute during this health crisis by aiding the research and development of vaccines and evidence-based therapy (Fig. 1), thereby broadening their public role and facilitating other HCPs [14]. Conclusions In the scenario of a viral pandemic and public restrictions, pharmacists can provide distinct, essential services in the community, clinic, hospital, and telepharmacy settings. Measures adopted in developed countries need to be followed vigilantly in LMICs to fight against COVID-19. Take home messages Foster a collaborative approach between the community and pharmacists and other HCPs to manage COVID-19. Enable pharmacists—an important part of the healthcare system—to play a significant role in stopping COVID-19 transmission as well as educating, managing, treating, and monitoring patients and reporting data. Encourage the public to consult pharmacists for their basic healthcare needs, counseling, and medications.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Reasons for healthcare workers becoming infected with novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China

          Sir, The outbreak of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in mainland China has been declared as a public health emergency (PHE) by the World Health Organization (WHO) [1]. Globally, until February 28th, 2020, there have been reported 83,774 confirmed cases and 2867 deaths [2]. During the periods of outbreak of COVID-19 or other infectious diseases, implementation of infection prevention and control (IPC) is of great importance in healthcare settings, especially regarding personal protection of healthcare workers [3,4]. In order to contain the outbreak of COVID-19 in mainland China, the National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China (NHCPRC) has so far dispatched medical support teams (41,600 healthcare workers from 30 provinces and municipalities) to assist with medical treatment in Wuhan and Hubei provinces [5]. A survey by the Health Commission of Guangdong Province released information on the distribution of 2431 healthcare workers in the Guangdong medical support teams [6]. Nurses (∼60%) were the predominant healthcare workers in the teams, followed by clinicians (∼30%). Half of clinicians with job titles were deputy chief physician, and 25% specialized in respiratory and critical medicine [6]. It is worth mentioning that 5.8% (140/2431) healthcare workers worked on the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in 2003 [6]. Recently, Wu et al. have reported the problems relating to COVID-19 IPC in healthcare settings, highlighting the personal protection of healthcare workers [7]. However, at a press conference of the WHO–China Joint Mission on COVID-19, NHCPRC reported that up until February 24th 2055 healthcare workers (community/hospital-acquired not to be defined) had been confirmed infected with COVID-19, with 22 (1.1%) deaths [8]. Ninety percent of infected healthcare workers were from Hubei province, and most cases happened in late January. It is worth mentioning that the proportion of healthcare workers infected by COVID-19 (2.7%, 95% CI: 2.6–2.8) was significantly lower compared with healthcare workers infected by SARS (21.1%, 95% CI: 20.2–22.0). Therefore, the director of the National Hospital Infection Management and Quality Control Centre summarized some reasons for such a high number of infected healthcare workers during the beginning of the emergency outbreak [9]. First, inadequate personal protection of healthcare workers at the beginning of the epidemic was a central issue. In fact, they did not understand the pathogen well; and their awareness of personal protection was not strong enough. Therefore, the front-line healthcare workers did not implement the effective personal protection before conducting the treatment. Second, long-time exposure to large numbers of infected patients directly increased the risk of infection for healthcare workers. Also, pressure of treatment, work intensity, and lack of rest indirectly increased the probability of infection for healthcare workers. Third, shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE) was also a serious problem. First-level emergency responses have been initiated in various parts of the country, which has led to a rapid increase in the demand for PPE. This circumstance increased the risk of infection for healthcare workers due to lack of sufficient PPE. Fourth, the front-line healthcare workers (except infectious disease physicians) received inadequate training for IPC, leaving them with a lack of knowledge of IPC for respiratory-borne infectious diseases. After initiation of emergency responses, healthcare workers have not had enough time for systematic training and practice. Professional supervision and guidance, as well as monitoring mechanisms, were lacking. This situation further amplified the risk of infection for healthcare workers. Finally, international communities, especially in other low- and middle-income countries with potential COVID-19 outbreaks, should learn early how to protect their healthcare workers. Furthermore, the COVID-19 confirmed cases have been reported to have surged in South Korea, Japan, Italy, and Iran in the past few days [2]. The increase in awareness of personal protection, sufficient PPE, and proper preparedness and response would play an important role in lowering the risk of infection for healthcare workers. Conflict of interest statement None declared. Funding sources None.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Recommendations and guidance for providing pharmaceutical care services during COVID-19 pandemic: A China perspective

            Background The novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19), which was first detected in Wuhan City, has now became a pandemic that affecting patients around the world. Particularly, the community patient population are at high risk of infection and are facing potential failure of proper medication use during the pandemic. Objective To discuss community pharmacists’ role and the content of pharmaceutical care (PC) during the novel coronavirus pandemic to promote effective prevention and control and safe drug use of the community patient population. Method Collect and summarize the experience Chinese community pharmacies gained from providing pharmacy services during the COVID-19 outbreak, and taking the PC needs into consideration, analyze and discuss the methods and strategies that community pharmacies and pharmacists shall use to provide PC during the pandemic. Results Community pharmacy management teams shall support PC services by providing adequate supply of COVID-19 related medications and preventative products, following environment regulations, and providing sufficient staff trainings. Pharmacists shall use various approaches to provide PC services in drug dispensing, consulting and referrals, chronic disease management, safe use of infusions, patient education, home care guidance and psychological support to promote the COVID-19 pandemic control and ensure safe medication use of community patients during the pandemic. Conclusion PC services in communities during the COVID-19 shall possess different properties due to disease characteristics and related patients' need. Community pharmacies shall work as a strong supporter of patient's medication and protective equipment supply. Community pharmacists shall be prepared to provide skilled and effective PC services for community patient population to ensure medication safety and promote the overall COVID-19 pandemic control.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Performance of retail pharmacies in low- and middle-income Asian settings: a systematic review

              In low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) in Asia, pharmacies are often patients’ first point of contact with the health care system and their preferred channel for purchasing medicines. Unfortunately, pharmacy practice in these settings has been characterized by deficient knowledge and inappropriate treatment. This paper systematically reviews both the performance of all types of pharmacies and drug stores across Asia’s LMIC, and the determinants of poor practice, in order to reflect on how this could best be addressed. Poor pharmacy practice in Asia appears to have persisted over the past 30 years. We identify a set of inadequacies that occur at key moments throughout the pharmacy encounter, including: insufficient history taking; lack of referral of patients who require medical attention; illegal sale of a wide range of prescription only medicines without a prescription; sale of medicines that are either clinically inappropriate and/or in doses that are outside of the therapeutic range; sale of incomplete courses of antibiotics; and limited provision of information and counselling. In terms of determinants of poor practice, first knowledge was found to be necessary but not sufficient to ensure correct management of patients presenting at the pharmacy. This is evidenced by large discrepancies between stated and actual practice; little difference in the treatment behaviour of less and more qualified personnel and the failure of training programmes to improve practice to a satisfactory level. Second, we identified a number of profit maximizing strategies employed by pharmacy staff that can be linked to poor practices. Finally, whilst the research is relatively sparse, the regulatory environment appears to play an important role in shaping behaviour. Future efforts to improve the situation may yield more success than historical attempts, which have tended to concentrate on education, if they address the profit incentives faced by pharmacy personnel and the regulatory system.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                husnainhamid9@gmail.com
                Journal
                Drugs Ther Perspect
                Drugs Ther Perspect
                Drugs & Therapy Perspectives
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                1172-0360
                1179-1977
                24 May 2020
                : 1-3
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.444936.8, ISNI 0000 0004 0608 9608, Faculty of Pharmacy, , University of Central Punjab, ; Lahore, Pakistan
                [2 ]GRID grid.1023.0, ISNI 0000 0001 2193 0854, Department of Allied and Health Sciences, , Central Queensland University, ; Sydney, Australia
                [3 ]GRID grid.440748.b, ISNI 0000 0004 1756 6705, College of Pharmacy, , Jouf University, ; Sakaka, Aljouf 72388 Saudi Arabia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7776-4381
                Article
                745
                10.1007/s40267-020-00745-7
                7245645
                32837187
                c47e0670-a230-41d3-b6fa-ee528640e46c
                © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                Categories
                Commentary

                Comments

                Comment on this article