On site cardiac surgery for structural heart interventions: a fence to mend?

Abstract

Current evidence supports device-based transcatheter interventions for the management of patients with structural heart disease, proving well their safety and efficacy; transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) of mitral or tricuspid valves, and left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) are expanding their role in contemporary practice. Currently, guidelines recommend performing TAVI in ‘Heart Valve Center’ with interventional cardiology and institutional on-site cardiac surgery (iOSCS), while no site limitation has been defined for TEER and LAAO. The growing number of candidates for transcatheter interventions generates long waiting times with negative consequences on mortality, morbidity, hospitalization, and functional deterioration. Therefore, a debate on the feasibility of TAVI in centres without iOSCS has been set up. Data from randomized controlled trials and registries failed to document any difference in outcomes and in conversion rate to emergent surgical bailout in centres with or without iOSCS; on the other hand, a direct relationship with TAVI complications has been clearly documented for learning curve and centre volume. Therefore, the role of iOSCS for TAVI, as well as for other transcatheter interventions, should be carefully explored.