2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Unlicensed medicines use: a UK guideline analysis using AGREE II

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          There is widespread use of unlicensed medicines within primary and secondary care but little information is available around how these medicines are used. This analysis examines and evaluates the content and quality of relevant guidance documentation currently in use within the UK.

          Methods

          Guidance documents were identified through a literature search as well as email requests to pharmacy organisations throughout the UK. Unlicensed medicine documentation suitable for inclusion in the analysis underwent thematic analysis and quality assessment using the AGREE II tool.

          Key findings

          Thematic analysis of 52 guidelines revealed four parent themes: (1) Professional responsibility (2) Usage practicalities (3) Risk versus benefit (4) Controlling use. There was variability in scores across the AGREE II domains with areas covering Scope and Purpose and Clarity of Presentation scoring well. Conversely, an area needing attention was Rigour of Development.

          Conclusion

          Healthcare organisations would benefit from agreeing a ‘core content’ for the development of unlicensed medicines guidelines to ensure consistency and the presence of robust operating systems to deliver safe, effective treatment to all NHS patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A Systematic Critical Appraisal of Non-Pharmacological Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis with Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II

              Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been developed to summarize evidence about the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and facilitate the uptake of evidence-based knowledge by consumers, health professionals, health administrators and policy makers. The objectives of this review was to assess the quality of CPGS on non-pharmacological management of RA with a standardized and validated instrument - the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool and summarize the key recommendations from these CPGs. Scientific literature databases from 2001 to 2013 were systematically searched and a total of 13 CPGs for RA was identified. Only a minority of AGREE II domains were effectively addressed by the CPGS. Scope and purpose was effectively addressed in 10 out of 13 CPGs, stakeholder involvement in 11 CPGs, rigor of development in 6 CPGs, clarity/presentation in 9 CPGs, editorial independence in 1 CPGs, and applicability in none of the CPGs. The overall quality of the included CPGs according to the 7-point AGREE II scoring system was 4.8±1.04. Patient education/self-management, aerobic, dynamic and stretching exercises were the commonly recommended for the non-pharmacological management of RA by the high-quality CPGs. The general clinical management recommendations tended to be similar among high-quality CPGs. Non-pharmacological management interventions were superficially addressed in more than half of the selected CPGs. CPGs creators should use the AGREE II criteria when developing guidelines. Innovative and effective methods of CPGs implementation to users are needed to ultimately enhance the quality of life of arthritic individuals. In addition, it was difficult to establish between strongly recommended, recommended and weakly recommended, as there is no consensus between the strength of the recommendations between the appraised CPGs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                gemma.donovan@sunderland.ac.uk
                Journal
                Int J Pharm Pract
                Int J Pharm Pract
                10.1111/(ISSN)2042-7174
                IJPP
                The International Journal of Pharmacy Practice
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0961-7671
                2042-7174
                30 January 2018
                December 2018
                : 26
                : 6 ( doiID: 10.1111/ijpp.2018.26.issue-6 )
                : 515-525
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] School of Pharmacy Pharmaceutical and Cosmetic Sciences Faculty of Health and Wellbeing University of Sunderland Sunderland UK
                [ 2 ] Medicines Optimisation Team NHS Sunderland Clinical Commissioning Group Sunderland UK
                [ 3 ] Pharmacy Department City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust Sunderland UK
                [ 4 ] Department of Sociology Wentworth College University of York York UK
                [ 5 ] 49 Marine Avenue Northumbria Primary Care Amble UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Gemma Donovan, University of Sunderland, Dale Building, Pasteur 153, Sciences Complex, Wharncliffe Street, Sunderland, SR1 3SD, United Kingdom

                E‐mail: gemma.donovan@ 123456sunderland.ac.uk

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0588-2666
                Article
                IJPP12436
                10.1111/ijpp.12436
                6282507
                29380460
                c53a8401-9591-4a0c-8ec6-5555f4f831a4
                © 2018 The Authors. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal Pharmaceutical Society

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 01 June 2017
                : 19 December 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 7, Pages: 11, Words: 6877
                Funding
                Funded by: Pharmacy Research UK
                Award ID: CPRG1
                Categories
                Research Paper
                Research Papers
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                ijpp12436
                December 2018
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:version=5.5.3 mode:remove_FC converted:06.12.2018

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                patient safety,evidence based practice,guidelines,interface issues,interprofessional issues

                Comments

                Comment on this article