5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mortalidad en trabajadores en la industria metalúrgica: revisión bibliográfica Translated title: Mortality among workers in metallurgical industry: literature review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          RESUMEN Fundamentos: El análisis de la mortalidad es un indicador que contribuye a evaluar el estado de la salud laboral de los trabajadores. Los trabajadores involucrados en la extracción, refinación, aleación y fabricación de metales están frecuentemente expuestos a riesgos laborales que pueden conducir a su muerte. El objetivo de este trabajo fue sintetizar la evidencia científica sobre mortalidad en trabajadores de la industria del metal. Métodos: Es una revisión bibliográfica de artículos científicos mediante la base de datos PubMed. Se incluyeron 17 estudios, donde los temas tratados abordaban problemas específicos que influyen en la mortalidad de los trabajadores del sector de la industria metalúrgica. Se revisaron los textos completos de los artículos. Resultados: Los hallazgos del estudio mostraron mayores probabilidades de causa de muerte por neoplasias malignas (48%), enfermedades del sistema circulatorio (28%), accidentes laborales (15%), suicidio y violencia (9%). Conclusiones: A pesar de las investigaciones realizadas, existen lagunas y limitaciones en el estudio de la mortalidad en los trabajadores de la industria metalúrgica, relacionadas fundamentalmente con la relación de la causa de muerte y los factores de riesgos laborales.

          Translated abstract

          ABSTRACT Background: The analysis of mortality offers an important indicator for assessing the state of workers' occupational health. Workers involved in the extraction, refining, alloying and manufacturing of metals are frequently exposed to occupational risks that can lead to their death. The objective of this work was to synthesize the scientific evidence about factors associated with mortality among workers in the metallurgical industry. Methods: A bibliographic review was conducted using the PubMed database. Seventeen studies were included, where topics addressed specific problems that influence the mortality of workers in the metallurgical industry sector. Complete texts of the articles were reviewed. Results: Findings show the highest probabilities of death due to malignant neoplasms (48%), diseases of the circulatory system (28%), work accidents (15%), suicide and violence (9%). Conclusions: Despite the research carried out, there are gaps and limitations in the study of mortality in workers in the metallurgical industry, mainly related to the relationship of the cause of death with occupational risk factors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Low mortality rates in industrial cohort studies due to selection for work and survival in the industry.

          Occupational groups are often described as being relatively healthy because their mortality rates are lower than those of the national average. Although correct this confuses the issue for those who are interested in assessing the effects of exposure to a particular chemical. In a further analysis of data collected in a study of all men ever exposed to vinyl chloride monomer in the manufacture of polyvinyl chloride in Great Britain, three factors have been shown to contribute to the low mortality rates that were observed. The three factors: the selection of a healthy population for employment, the survival in the industry of the healthier men, and the length of time that this population has been pursued, have been quantified. The mortality experience within five years of entering this industry was shown to be as low as 37% of that expected; for circulatory disease and respiratory disease it was as low as 21%. There was a progressive increase in standardized mortality ratio with the length of time since entry so that the effect had almost disappeared 15 years after entry. To avoid confounding the selection effect with the survival effect the latter was measured by separating men who survived 15 years after entering the industry according to whether or not they were still in the industry after this period. Those who had left experienced an overall standardized mortality ratio some 50% higher than those still in the industry. This effect, although consistent in the age groups between 25 and 74 years and for all cause groups studied, was greatest in those aged between 25 and 44 years and for lung cancer and respiratory disease.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Occupational dermal exposure to nanoparticles and nano-enabled products: Part I-Factors affecting skin absorption.

            The paper reviews and critically assesses the evidence on the relevance of various skin uptake pathways for engineered nanoparticles, nano-objects, their agglomerates and aggregates (NOAA). It focuses especially in occupational settings, in the context of nanotoxicology, risk assessment, occupational medicine, medical/epidemiological surveillance efforts, and the development of relevant exposure assessment strategies. Skin uptake of nanoparticles is presented in the context of local and systemic health effects, especially contact dermatitis, skin barrier integrity, physico-chemical properties of NOAA, and predisposing risk factors, such as stratum corneum disruption due to occupational co-exposure to chemicals, and the presence of occupational skin diseases. Attention should be given to: (1) Metal NOAA, since the potential release of ions may induce local skin effects (e.g. irritation and contact dermatitis) and absorption of toxic or sensitizing metals; (2) NOAA with metal catalytic residue, since potential release of ions may also induce local skin effects and absorption of toxic metals; (3) rigid NOAA smaller than 45nm that can penetrate and permeate the skin; (4) non rigid or flexible NOAA, where due to their flexibility liposomes and micelles can penetrate and permeate the intact skin; (5) impaired skin condition of exposed workers. Furthermore, we outline possible situations where health surveillance could be appropriate where there is NOAA occupational skin exposures, e.g. when working with nanoparticles made of sensitizer metals, NOAA containing sensitizer impurities, and/or in occupations with a high prevalence of disrupted skin barrier integrity. The paper furthermore recommends a stepwise approach to evaluate risk related to NOAA to be applied in occupational exposure and risk assessment, and discusses implications related to health surveillance, labelling, and risk communication.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Work in the metal industry and nasopharyngeal cancer mortality among formaldehyde-exposed workers.

              To investigate further the possibility that the large nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) mortality excess among a cohort of formaldehyde-exposed workers may be related to occupational factors external to the study plant. Subjects were 7345 workers employed at a plastics-producing plant (1941-1984) in Wallingford, Connecticut evaluated independently as part of a National Cancer Institute cohort study. Vital status for 98% of the cohort and cause of death for 95% of 2872 deaths were determined through 2003. Reconstructed worker exposures to formaldehyde were used to compute unlagged and lagged exposure measures. We computed standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) based on US and local county rates. In a nested case-control study we evaluated mortality risks from NPC and from all other pharyngeal cancers combined (AOPC) in relation to formaldehyde exposure while accounting for potential confounding or effect modification by smoking or external (non-Wallingford) employment. Job applications, Connecticut commercial city directories and a previous survey were used to assign subjects to three external job groups. We observed no new deaths from NPC and one additional AOPC death (pharynx unspecified) yielding, respectively, SMRs of 4.43 (7 deaths, 95% CI=1.78-9.13) and 1.71 (16 deaths, 95% CI=1.01-2.72). Five of seven NPC cases worked in silver smithing (including brass plating and other jobs related to silver or brass) or other metal work (including steel working and welding), and this type of work was relatively rare in the remaining study population (OR=14.41, 95% CI=1.08-82.1). For AOPC, we found a moderate increase in risk for other metal work (OR=1.40, 95% CI=.31-5.1). Interaction models suggested that NPC and AOPC risks were not elevated in subjects exposed only to formaldehyde. The results of our nested case-control study suggest that the large nasopharyngeal cancer mortality excess in the Wallingford cohort may not be due to formaldehyde exposure, but rather reflects the influence of external employment in the ferrous and non-ferrous metal industries of the local area that entailed possible exposures to several suspected risk factors for upper respiratory system cancer (e.g., sulfuric acid mists, mineral acid, metal dusts and heat). Our findings may also help to explain why the associations with formaldehyde and nasopharyngeal cancer reported in the 1994 update of the 10-plant NCI formaldehyde cohort study were unique to the Wallingford plant (Plant 1 in NCI study). Further updates of the NCI formaldehyde cohort study should include co-exposure data on silver smithing and other metal work for all study plants to help explain the unique findings for nasopharyngeal cancer in Plant 1 compared with the other nine plants.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                resp
                Revista Española de Salud Pública
                Rev. Esp. Salud Publica
                Ministerio de Sanidad, Consumo y Bienestar social (Madrid, Madrid, Spain )
                1135-5727
                2173-9110
                2021
                : 95
                : e202106081
                Affiliations
                [1] Alicante Valencia orgnameUniversidad de Alicante orgdiv1Área de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública Spain
                [3] Alicante Valencia orgnameUniversidad de Alicante orgdiv1Departamento de Ingeniería Química Spain
                [2] Hangzhou orgnameZhejiang University orgdiv1School of Medicine orgdiv2Institute of Social Medicine China
                [5] Alicante Valencia orgnameUniversidad de Alicante orgdiv1Instituto Universitario de Física Aplicada a las Ciencias y las Tecnologías Spain
                [6] Madrid orgnameCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública España
                [4] Alicante Valencia orgnameUniversidad de Alicante orgdiv1Departamento de Física, Ingeniería de Sistemas y Teoría de la Señal Spain
                Article
                S1135-57272021000100601 S1135-5727(21)09500000601
                c555ea03-8144-494d-9f64-a7f52618703c

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 International License.

                History
                : 10 May 2021
                : 10 December 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 36, Pages: 0
                Product

                SciELO Public Health


                Riesgos laborales,Enfermedades profesionales,Salud laboral,Prevención,Mortalidad,Metal,Prevention,Occupational health,Occupational diseases,Occupational risks,Mortality

                Comments

                Comment on this article