32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Site of cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials using the MED-EL standard electrode array

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The standard electrode array for the MED-EL MAESTRO cochlear implant system is 31 mm in length which allows an insertion angle of approximately 720°. When fully inserted, this long electrode array is capable of stimulating the most apical region of the cochlea. No investigation has explored Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential (ECAP) recordings in this region with a large number of subjects using a commercially available cochlear implant system. The aim of this study is to determine if certain properties of ECAP recordings vary, depending on the stimulation site in the cochlea.

          Methods

          Recordings of auditory nerve responses were conducted in 67 subjects to demonstrate the feasibility of ECAP recordings using the Auditory Nerve Response Telemetry (ART™) feature of the MED-EL MAESTRO system software. These recordings were then analyzed based on the site of cochlear stimulation defined as basal, middle and apical to determine if the amplitude, threshold and slope of the amplitude growth function and the refractory time differs depending on the region of stimulation.

          Results

          Findings show significant differences in the ECAP recordings depending on the stimulation site. Comparing the apical with the basal region, on average higher amplitudes, lower thresholds and steeper slopes of the amplitude growth function have been observed. The refractory time shows an overall dependence on cochlear region; however post-hoc tests showed no significant effect between individual regions.

          Conclusions

          Obtaining ECAP recordings is also possible in the most apical region of the cochlea. However, differences can be observed depending on the region of the cochlea stimulated. Specifically, significant higher ECAP amplitude, lower thresholds and steeper amplitude growth function slopes have been observed in the apical region. These differences could be explained by the location of the stimulating electrode with respect to the neural tissue in the cochlea, a higher density, or an increased neural survival rate of neural tissue in the apex.

          Trial registration

          The Clinical Investigation has the Competent Authority registration number DE/CA126/AP4/3332/18/05.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Significance Test for Sphericity of a Normal $n$-Variate Distribution

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults.

            The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between electrically evoked whole nerve action potential (EAP) and electrical auditory brain stem response (EABR) thresholds and MAP threshold (T-level) and maximum comfort level (C-level) for subjects who use the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Forty-four adult Nucleus 24 cochlear implant users participated in this study. EAP thresholds were recorded using the Neural Response Telemetry System developed by Cochlear Corporation. EABR thresholds were measured for a subset of 14 subjects using standard evoked potential techniques. These physiologic thresholds were collected on a set of five electrodes spaced across the cochlea, and were then compared with behavioral measures of T-level and C-level used to program the speech processor. EAP thresholds were correlated with MAP T- and C-levels; however, the correlation was not strong. A technique for improving the correlation by combining measures of T- and C-levels made on one electrode with the EAP thresholds was presented. Correlations between predicted and measured T- and C-levels using this technique were 0.83 and 0.77, respectively. Similar results were obtained using the EABR thresholds for a smaller set of subjects. In general, EABR thresholds were recorded at levels that were approximately 4.7 programming units lower than EAP thresholds. Either EAP or EABR thresholds can be used in combination with a limited amount of behavioral information to predict MAP T- and C-levels with reasonable accuracy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The HSM sentence test as a tool for evaluating the speech understanding in noise of cochlear implant users.

              The German HSM Sentence Test, available on compact disc (CD), consists of 30 lists of 20 everyday sentences. It was developed in the desire to have a sufficient number of test sentences for the repeated evaluation of speech understanding of CI users. A noise with speech-shaped spectrum on the CD allows the evaluation of speech understanding in noise. With the HSM Sentence Test we evaluated the speech understanding of participants of the Combi-40 European Multicentric Study. Results are shown for sentences presented without noise and with signal-to-noise ratios of 15, 10, 5 and 0 dB.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Biomed Eng Online
                BioMedical Engineering OnLine
                BioMed Central
                1475-925X
                2009
                16 December 2009
                : 8
                : 40
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany
                [2 ]HNO Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU München, München, Germany
                [3 ]St Elisabeth Hospital, HNO-Klinik der Ruhr Universität, Bochum, Germany
                [4 ]HNO-Heilkunde, Klinikum der JW Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
                [5 ]HNO-Klinik, Katholisches Klinikum Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany
                [6 ]HNO- Heilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
                [7 ]HNO Klinik der Universität Basel, Basel, Switzerland
                [8 ]Christian-Doppler-Labor, Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
                [9 ]MED-EL GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria
                Article
                1475-925X-8-40
                10.1186/1475-925X-8-40
                2803480
                20015362
                c572ee49-1dec-479d-922c-121b7a74a16b
                Copyright ©2009 Brill et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 26 May 2009
                : 16 December 2009
                Categories
                Research

                Biomedical engineering
                Biomedical engineering

                Comments

                Comment on this article