21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Putting research in place: an innovative approach to providing contextualized evidence synthesis for decision makers

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The Contextualized Health Research Synthesis Program (CHRSP), developed in 2007 by the Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health Research, produces contextualized knowledge syntheses for health-system decision makers. The program provides timely, relevant, and easy-to-understand scientific evidence; optimizes evidence uptake; and, most importantly, attunes research questions and evidence to the specific context in which knowledge users must apply the findings.

          Methods

          As an integrated knowledge translation (KT) method, CHRSP:

          • Involves intensive partnerships with senior healthcare decision makers who propose priority research topics and participate on research teams;

          • Considers local context both in framing the research question and in reporting the findings;

          • Makes economical use of resources by utilizing a limited number of staff;

          • Uses a combination of external and local experts; and

          • Works quickly by synthesizing high-level systematic review evidence rather than primary studies.

          Although it was developed in the Canadian province of Newfoundland and Labrador, the CHRSP methodology is adaptable to a variety of settings with distinctive features, such as those in rural, remote, and small-town locations.

          Results

          CHRSP has published 25 syntheses on priority topics chosen by the provincial healthcare system, including:

          • Clinical and cost-effectiveness: telehealth, rural renal dialysis, point-of-care testing;

          • Community-based health services: helping seniors age in place, supporting seniors with dementia, residential treatment centers for at-risk youth;

          • Healthcare organization/service delivery: reducing acute-care length of stay, promoting flu vaccination among health workers, safe patient handling, age-friendly acute care; and

          • Health promotion: diabetes prevention, promoting healthy dietary habits.

          These studies have been used by decision makers to inform local policy and practice decisions.

          Conclusions

          By asking the health system to identify its own priorities and to participate directly in the research process, CHRSP fully integrates KT among researchers and knowledge users in healthcare in Newfoundland and Labrador. This high level of decision-maker buy-in has resulted in a corresponding level of uptake. CHRSP studies have directly informed a number of policy and practice directions, including the design of youth residential treatment centers, a provincial policy on single-use medical devices, and most recently, the opening of the province’s first Acute Care for the Elderly hospital unit.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map?

            There is confusion and misunderstanding about the concepts of knowledge translation, knowledge transfer, knowledge exchange, research utilization, implementation, diffusion, and dissemination. We review the terms and definitions used to describe the concept of moving knowledge into action. We also offer a conceptual framework for thinking about the process and integrate the roles of knowledge creation and knowledge application. The implications of knowledge translation for continuing education in the health professions include the need to base continuing education on the best available knowledge, the use of educational and other transfer strategies that are known to be effective, and the value of learning about planned-action theories to be better able to understand and influence change in practice settings.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Knowledge translation of research findings

              Background One of the most consistent findings from clinical and health services research is the failure to translate research into practice and policy. As a result of these evidence-practice and policy gaps, patients fail to benefit optimally from advances in healthcare and are exposed to unnecessary risks of iatrogenic harms, and healthcare systems are exposed to unnecessary expenditure resulting in significant opportunity costs. Over the last decade, there has been increasing international policy and research attention on how to reduce the evidence-practice and policy gap. In this paper, we summarise the current concepts and evidence to guide knowledge translation activities, defined as T2 research (the translation of new clinical knowledge into improved health). We structure the article around five key questions: what should be transferred; to whom should research knowledge be transferred; by whom should research knowledge be transferred; how should research knowledge be transferred; and, with what effect should research knowledge be transferred? Discussion We suggest that the basic unit of knowledge translation should usually be up-to-date systematic reviews or other syntheses of research findings. Knowledge translators need to identify the key messages for different target audiences and to fashion these in language and knowledge translation products that are easily assimilated by different audiences. The relative importance of knowledge translation to different target audiences will vary by the type of research and appropriate endpoints of knowledge translation may vary across different stakeholder groups. There are a large number of planned knowledge translation models, derived from different disciplinary, contextual (i.e., setting), and target audience viewpoints. Most of these suggest that planned knowledge translation for healthcare professionals and consumers is more likely to be successful if the choice of knowledge translation strategy is informed by an assessment of the likely barriers and facilitators. Although our evidence on the likely effectiveness of different strategies to overcome specific barriers remains incomplete, there is a range of informative systematic reviews of interventions aimed at healthcare professionals and consumers (i.e., patients, family members, and informal carers) and of factors important to research use by policy makers. Summary There is a substantial (if incomplete) evidence base to guide choice of knowledge translation activities targeting healthcare professionals and consumers. The evidence base on the effects of different knowledge translation approaches targeting healthcare policy makers and senior managers is much weaker but there are a profusion of innovative approaches that warrant further evaluation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                sbornste@mun.ca
                rochelle.baker@med.mun.ca
                pnavarro@mun.ca
                sarah.mackey@med.mun.ca
                david.speed@med.mun.ca
                melissa.sullivan@med.mun.ca
                Journal
                Syst Rev
                Syst Rev
                Systematic Reviews
                BioMed Central (London )
                2046-4053
                2 November 2017
                2 November 2017
                2017
                : 6
                : 218
                Affiliations
                Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health Research, 95 Bonaventure Avenue, Suite 300, St. John’s, NL A1B 2X5 Canada
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6809-4646
                Article
                606
                10.1186/s13643-017-0606-4
                5667442
                29096710
                c573012b-f398-408e-8ba6-31e4a9dd16b7
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 4 July 2017
                : 6 October 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: Canadian Institutes for Health Research
                Award ID: 374427
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Methodology
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Public health
                Public health

                Comments

                Comment on this article