32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Long-term efficacy and effectiveness of a behavioural and community-based exercise intervention (Urban Training) to increase physical activity in patients with COPD: a randomised controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There is a need to increase and maintain physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We assessed 12-month efficacy and effectiveness of the Urban Training intervention on physical activity in COPD patients.

          This randomised controlled trial (NCT01897298) allocated 407 COPD patients from primary and hospital settings 1:1 to usual care (n=205) or Urban Training (n=202). Urban Training consisted of a baseline motivational interview, advice to walk on urban trails designed for COPD patients in outdoor public spaces and other optional components for feedback, motivation, information and support (pedometer, calendar, physical activity brochure, website, phone text messages, walking groups and a phone number). The primary outcome was 12-month change in steps·day −1 measured by accelerometer.

          Efficacy analysis (with per-protocol analysis set, n=233 classified as adherent to the assigned intervention) showed adjusted (95% CI) 12-month difference +957 (184–1731) steps·day −1 between Urban Training and usual care. Effectiveness analysis (with intention-to-treat analysis set, n=280 patients completing the study at 12 months including unwilling and self-reported non-adherent patients) showed no differences between groups. Leg muscle pain during walks was more frequently reported in Urban Training than usual care, without differences in any of the other adverse events.

          Urban Training, combining behavioural strategies with unsupervised outdoor walking, was efficacious in increasing physical activity after 12 months in COPD patients, with few safety concerns. However, it was ineffective in the full population including unwilling and self-reported non-adherent patients.

          Abstract

          Urban Training in COPD increased physical activity after 12 months but not in self-reported non-adherent patients http://ow.ly/dc2C30lnAEs

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Standards for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with COPD: a summary of the ATS/ERS position paper.

          W MacNee, , B Celli (2004)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Validity of Six Activity Monitors in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Comparison with Indirect Calorimetry

              Reduced physical activity is an important feature of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Various activity monitors are available but their validity is poorly established. The aim was to evaluate the validity of six monitors in patients with COPD. We hypothesized triaxial monitors to be more valid compared to uniaxial monitors. Thirty-nine patients (age 68±7years, FEV1 54±18%predicted) performed a one-hour standardized activity protocol. Patients wore 6 monitors (Kenz Lifecorder (Kenz), Actiwatch, RT3, Actigraph GT3X (Actigraph), Dynaport MiniMod (MiniMod), and SenseWear Armband (SenseWear)) as well as a portable metabolic system (Oxycon Mobile). Validity was evaluated by correlation analysis between indirect calorimetry (VO2) and the monitor outputs: Metabolic Equivalent of Task [METs] (SenseWear, MiniMod), activity counts (Actiwatch), vector magnitude units (Actigraph, RT3) and arbitrary units (Kenz) over the whole protocol and slow versus fast walking. Minute-by-minute correlations were highest for the MiniMod (r = 0.82), Actigraph (r = 0.79), SenseWear (r = 0.73) and RT3 (r = 0.73). Over the whole protocol, the mean correlations were best for the SenseWear (r = 0.76), Kenz (r = 0.52), Actigraph (r = 0.49) and MiniMod (r = 0.45). The MiniMod (r = 0.94) and Actigraph (r = 0.88) performed better in detecting different walking speeds. The Dynaport MiniMod, Actigraph GT3X and SenseWear Armband (all triaxial monitors) are the most valid monitors during standardized physical activities. The Dynaport MiniMod and Actigraph GT3X discriminate best between different walking speeds.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Eur Respir J
                Eur. Respir. J
                ERJ
                erj
                The European Respiratory Journal
                European Respiratory Society
                0903-1936
                1399-3003
                October 2018
                18 October 2018
                : 52
                : 4
                : 1800063
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
                [2 ]Pompeu Fabra University (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
                [3 ]CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
                [4 ]Physical Activity and Sports Sciences, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Deusto, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
                [5 ]Respiratory Clinic Institute, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
                [6 ]Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS)-Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
                [7 ]Pneumology Dept, Hospital del Mar, Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
                [8 ]CIBER Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES), Bunyola, Spain
                [9 ]Sant Roc Primary Healthcare Centre, Institut Català de la Salut (ICS), Badalona, Spain
                [10 ]Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Barcelona, Spain
                [11 ]Institute for Health Science Research Germans Trias i Pujol (IGTP), Badalona, Spain
                [12 ]Hospital de Viladecans, Viladecans, Spain
                [13 ]Passeig de Sant Joan Primary Healthcare Centre, Institut Català de la Salut (ICS), Barcelona, Spain
                [14 ]Pneumology Dept, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
                [15 ]Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain
                [16 ]Agency for Health Quality and Assessment of Catalonia (AQuAS), Barcelona, Spain
                [17 ]Pneumology Dept, Hospital de Mataró, Mataró, Barcelona, Spain
                [18 ]Viladecans 2 Primary Healthcare Centre, Institut Català de la Salut (ICS), Viladecans, Spain
                [19 ]University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
                [20 ]Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC), Barcelona, Spain
                [21 ]FCS Blanquerna, Global Research on Wellbeing (GRoW), Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain
                Author notes
                Judith Garcia-Aymerich, Barcelona Institute of Global Health (ISGlobal), Dr Aiguader 88, 08003 Barcelona, Spain. E-mail: judith.garcia@ 123456isglobal.org
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3565-0751
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5149-2015
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0378-4467
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9600-3510
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0656-8126
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8839-5056
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7097-4586
                Article
                ERJ-00063-2018
                10.1183/13993003.00063-2018
                6203405
                30166322
                c588a75b-fea6-4596-9cb1-3e3af926d999
                Copyright ©ERS 2018.

                This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.

                History
                : 11 January 2018
                : 06 August 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica http://doi.org/10.13039/501100007509
                Award ID: 147/2011
                Award ID: 201/2011
                Funded by: Instituto de Salud Carlos III http://doi.org/10.13039/501100004587
                Award ID: PI11/01283
                Award ID: PI14/0419
                Funded by: Societat Catalana de Pneumologia
                Award ID: Ajuts al millor projecte en fisioteràpia respirat
                Categories
                Original Articles
                COPD

                Respiratory medicine
                Respiratory medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article