2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      El entrenamiento de Vibración de Cuerpo Completo no mejora el Umbral de Sensibilidad a la Vibración Periferica: estudio controlado aleatorizado doble ciego Translated title: Whole Body Vibration training not improves perception thresohld in patients with Diabetes Mellitus type 2: double-blind randomized controlled study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Resumen Objetivos. El propósito de este estudio es comprobar los efectos de un entrenamiento de Vibración de Cuerpo Completo (VCC) de 8 semanas sobre el Umbral de Sensibilidad a la Vibración Periférica (USVP) en personas con Diabetes Mellitus (DM) tipo 2. Configuración y Diseño. Estudio controlado aleatorizado a doble ciego (ISRCTN16866781). Materiales y Métodos. Un total de 76 personas con DM tipo 2 son incluidas en el análisis estadístico, siendo repartidos 39 pacientes en el grupo de VCC y 37 pacientes en el grupo placebo. A ambos grupos se les aplicó un entrenamiento de 8 semanas de VCC, siendo 3 sesiones por semana, para ser en total 24 sesiones de VCC y de placebo. Se les evaluó el USVP a través del Biotensiómetro Vibratron II antes de la intervención y después de las 8 semanas de entrenamiento. Análisis Estadístico utilizado. Para comprobar que los grupos eran comparables en la línea base en cuanto a las características de los participantes se realizó una prueba T para muestras independientes. Para determinar si la intervención de VCC había tenido efecto sobre el USVP, se realizó un ANCOVA, utilizando como covariable el nivel inicial del USVP. La significación estadística fue establecida en P <,05. Resultados. El grupo de VCC y el grupo placebo fueron comparables en la línea base en todas las variables incluídas para la caracterización de la muestra. El entrenamiento de VCC no tuve ningún efecto estadísticamente significativo sobre el USVP. Conclusiones. Tras un entrenamiento de Vibración de Cuerpo Completo de 8 semanas de duración no hubo efectos sobre el umbral de sensibilidad a la vibración periférica.

          Translated abstract

          Abstract Aims. The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of an 8-week Whole Body Vibration (WBV) training on the Peripheral Vibration Sensitivity Threshold (PVST) in people with Diabetes Mellitus (DM) type 2. Settings and Design. A double-blind randomized controlled study (ISRCTN16866781). Methods and Material. A total of 76 people with DM type 2 are included in the statistical analysis, 39 patients in the WBV group and 37 patients in the placebo group. Both groups were given 8 weeks of WBV training, 3 sessions per week, for a total of 24 sessions of WBV and placebo. The PVST was assessed through the Biotensiometer Vibratron II before the intervention and after the 8 weeks of training. Statistical analysis used. To check that the groups were comparable at the baseline in terms of participant characteristics, a T-test for independent samples was performed. To determine whether the WBV intervention had had an effect on the PVST, an ANCOVA was performed, using the initial level of the PVST as a covariate. Statistical significance was established at P <.05. Results. The WBV group and the placebo group were comparable at baseline on all variables included for sample characterization. The WBV training had no statistically significant effect on the PVST. Conclusions. After 8 weeks of Whole Body Vibration training there was no effect on the Peripheral Vibration Sensitivity Threshold.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040.

          To produce current estimates of the national, regional and global impact of diabetes for 2015 and 2040.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation.

            The classification of diabetes mellitus and the tests used for its diagnosis were brought into order by the National Diabetes Data Group of the USA and the second World Health Organization Expert Committee on Diabetes Mellitus in 1979 and 1980. Apart from minor modifications by WHO in 1985, little has been changed since that time. There is however considerable new knowledge regarding the aetiology of different forms of diabetes as well as more information on the predictive value of different blood glucose values for the complications of diabetes. A WHO Consultation has therefore taken place in parallel with a report by an American Diabetes Association Expert Committee to re-examine diagnostic criteria and classification. The present document includes the conclusions of the former and is intended for wide distribution and discussion before final proposals are submitted to WHO for approval. The main changes proposed are as follows. The diagnostic fasting plasma (blood) glucose value has been lowered to > or =7.0 mmol l(-1) (6.1 mmol l(-1)). Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT) is changed to allow for the new fasting level. A new category of Impaired Fasting Glycaemia (IFG) is proposed to encompass values which are above normal but below the diagnostic cut-off for diabetes (plasma > or =6.1 to or =5.6 to <6.1 mmol l(-1)). Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) now includes gestational impaired glucose tolerance as well as the previous GDM. The classification defines both process and stage of the disease. The processes include Type 1, autoimmune and non-autoimmune, with beta-cell destruction; Type 2 with varying degrees of insulin resistance and insulin hyposecretion; Gestational Diabetes Mellitus; and Other Types where the cause is known (e.g. MODY, endocrinopathies). It is anticipated that this group will expand as causes of Type 2 become known. Stages range from normoglycaemia to insulin required for survival. It is hoped that the new classification will allow better classification of individuals and lead to fewer therapeutic misjudgements.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Physical activity advice only or structured exercise training and association with HbA1c levels in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

              Regular exercise improves glucose control in diabetes, but the association of different exercise training interventions on glucose control is unclear. To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) assessing associations of structured exercise training regimens (aerobic, resistance, or both) and physical activity advice with or without dietary cointervention on change in hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) in type 2 diabetes patients. MEDLINE, Cochrane-CENTRAL, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, LILACS, and SPORTDiscus databases were searched from January 1980 through February 2011. RCTs of at least 12 weeks' duration that evaluated the ability of structured exercise training or physical activity advice to lower HbA(1c) levels as compared with a control group in patients with type 2 diabetes. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed quality of the included studies. Of 4191 articles retrieved, 47 RCTs (8538 patients) were included. Pooled mean differences in HbA(1c) levels between intervention and control groups were calculated using a random-effects model. Overall, structured exercise training (23 studies) was associated with a decline in HbA(1c) level (-0.67%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.84% to -0.49%; I(2), 91.3%) compared with control participants. In addition, structured aerobic exercise (-0.73%; 95% CI, -1.06% to -0.40%; I(2), 92.8%), structured resistance training (-0.57%; 95% CI, -1.14% to -0.01%; I(2), 92.5%), and both combined (-0.51%; 95% CI, -0.79% to -0.23%; I(2), 67.5%) were each associated with declines in HbA(1C) levels compared with control participants. Structured exercise durations of more than 150 minutes per week were associated with HbA(1c) reductions of 0.89%, while structured exercise durations of 150 minutes or less per week were associated with HbA(1C) reductions of 0.36%. Overall, interventions of physical activity advice (24 studies) were associated with lower HbA(1c) levels (-0.43%; 95% CI, -0.59% to -0.28%; I(2), 62.9%) compared with control participants. Combined physical activity advice and dietary advice was associated with decreased HbA(1c) (-0.58%; 95% CI, -0.74% to -0.43%; I(2), 57.5%) as compared with control participants. Physical activity advice alone was not associated with HbA(1c) changes. Structured exercise training that consists of aerobic exercise, resistance training, or both combined is associated with HbA(1c) reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes. Structured exercise training of more than 150 minutes per week is associated with greater HbA(1c) declines than that of 150 minutes or less per week. Physical activity advice is associated with lower HbA(1c), but only when combined with dietary advice.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                jonnpr
                Journal of Negative and No Positive Results
                JONNPR
                Research and Science S.L. (Madrid, Madrid, Spain )
                2529-850X
                2020
                : 5
                : 9
                : 963-982
                Affiliations
                [1] Extremadura orgnameUniversidad de Extremadura orgdiv1Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte Spain
                [2] Madrid orgnameUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos orgdiv1Centro de Estudios Deportivos Spain
                Article
                S2529-850X2020000900963 S2529-850X(20)00500900963
                10.19230/jonnpr.3540
                c596e6a8-8a19-44ee-93e1-a39442d15508

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 30 January 2020
                : 19 January 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 30, Pages: 20
                Product

                SciELO Spain

                Categories
                Original

                vibración,diabetes,umbral de sensibilidad,Vibration,Sensitivity Threshold

                Comments

                Comment on this article