3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Validation of the Chinese Version of the Procrastination at Work Scale

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The purpose of this study was to validate the Chinese version of the Procrastination at Work Scale (PAWS), a recently developed scale aimed at assessing procrastination in the work context. We translated the PAWS into Chinese and conducted exploratory factor analysis on participants in sample A ( N = 236), resulting in a two-factor solution consistent with the original PAWS. In sample B ( N = 227), confirmatory factor analysis showed that a two-factor, bifactor model fit the data best. Configural, metric, and scalar invariance models were tested, which demonstrated that the Chinese version of the PAWS did not differ across groups by gender, age, education, or job position. Validity testing demonstrated that the scale relates to work engagement, counterproductive work behavior, task performance, workplace well-being, and organizational commitment. This study indicated that the Chinese version of the PAWS could be used in future research to measure procrastination at work in China.

          Related collections

          Most cited references70

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            lavaan: AnRPackage for Structural Equation Modeling

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                16 September 2021
                2021
                : 12
                : 726595
                Affiliations
                Institute of Organization and Human Resources, School of Public Administration and Policy, Renmin University of China , Beijing, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Feng Kong, Shaanxi Normal University, China

                Reviewed by: Barna Konkoly-Thege, Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, Canada; Xiqin Liu, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, China

                *Correspondence: Chaoping Li lichaoping@ 123456ruc.edu.cn

                This article was submitted to Organizational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2021.726595
                8481865
                34603147
                c5ca76fb-24de-4c5b-900a-7674e5c25bf4
                Copyright © 2021 Wang, Li, Meng and Liu.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 17 June 2021
                : 17 August 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 5, Equations: 0, References: 72, Pages: 11, Words: 8945
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                procrastination at work,scale validation,measurement invariance,chinese adults,work engagement,task performance

                Comments

                Comment on this article