2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Combining ddPCR and environmental DNA to improve detection capabilities of a critically endangered freshwater invertebrate

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Isogenus nubecula is a critically endangered Plecoptera species. Considered extinct in the UK, I. nubecula was recently rediscovered (in one location of the River Dee, Wales), after 22 years of absence. In a similar way to many other species of Perlodidae, I. nubecula could be utilised as a bio-indicator, for assessing water quality and health status of a given freshwater system. However, conventional monitoring of invertebrates via kick-sampling, is invasive and expensive (time consuming). Further, such methods require a high level of taxonomic expertise. Here, we compared the traditional kick-sampling method with the use of eDNA detection using qPCR and ddPCR-analyses. In spring 2018, we sampled eDNA from twelve locations on the River Dee. I. nubecula was detected using kick-sampling in five of these locations, three locations using both eDNA detection and kick-sampling and one location using eDNA detection alone – resulting in a total of six known and distinct populations of this critically endangered species. Interestingly, despite the eDNA assay being validated in vitro and in silico, and results indicating high sensitivity, qPCR analysis of the eDNA samples proved to be ineffective. In contrast, ddPCR analyses resulted in a clear detection of I. nubecula at four locations suggesting that inhibition most likely explains the large discrepancy between the obtained qPCR and ddPCR results. It is therefore important to explore inhibition effects on any new eDNA assay. We also highlight that ddPCR may well be the best option for the detection of aquatic organisms which are either rare or likely to shed low levels of eDNA into their environment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Critical considerations for the application of environmental DNA methods to detect aquatic species

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Quantification of eDNA shedding rates from invasive bighead carp Hypophthalmichthys nobilis and silver carp Hypophthalmichthys molitrix

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                quentin.mauvisseau@gmail.com
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                1 October 2019
                1 October 2019
                2019
                : 9
                : 14064
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2232 4004, GRID grid.57686.3a, Aquatic Research Facility, Environmental Sustainability Research Centre, , University of Derby, ; Derby, DE22 1GB United Kingdom
                [2 ]Surescreen Scientifics Ltd, Morley Retreat, Church Lane, Morley, DE7 6DE United Kingdom
                [3 ]Freshwater Biological Association, River Laboratory, East Stoke, Wareham, Dorset, BH20 6BB United Kingdom
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2270 9879, GRID grid.35937.3b, Natural History Museum, ; Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD United Kingdom
                [5 ]GRID grid.435417.0, Research Institute for Nature and Forest, ; Gaverstraat 4, 9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1215-2987
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6403-9447
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4983-8333
                Article
                50571
                10.1038/s41598-019-50571-9
                6773776
                31575968
                c5dd3781-830c-4e33-8698-5ace8303af61
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 11 June 2019
                : 27 August 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: The study was funded by Surescreen Scientifics, UK and Natural Resources Wales.
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Uncategorized
                freshwater ecology,conservation biology,molecular ecology
                Uncategorized
                freshwater ecology, conservation biology, molecular ecology

                Comments

                Comment on this article