8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Honey Bee Exposure to the Fungicide Propiconazole in Lowbush Blueberry Fields

      Agronomy
      MDPI AG

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The fungicide propiconazole is a commonly used fungicide in small fruit and tree fruit production in the U.S.A. In Maine wild blueberry production, it is used almost exclusively for mummy berry disease control. The goal of this study is to assess the risk of exposure to honey bee colonies deployed in wild blueberry fields for pollination. The study was conducted over a six-year period (2009–2014) in both the field and laboratory. Field surveys (2009–2011) measured the residues on blueberry flowers in 41 commercial fields across the blueberry growing region. A two-year study (2010–2011) determined the decay rate of propiconazole in blueberry fields after application. A laboratory study determined the contact LD50 of propiconazole to honey bee workers (2013). A field exposure/effect study was conducted over three years (2011–2013). In this study, 8–18 previously unexposed colonies were randomly assigned to one of two treatments, (1) isolated fields that were treated prior to bloom with the fungicide, propiconazole, but no other pesticides, or (2) isolated fields that were not treated with propiconazole or any other pesticides. The measures taken to evaluate effects of exposure monitored each year were (1) estimation of the exposure to colonies, measured as residues on flowers, workers, and in pollen brought back to hives; (2) colony population size (workers and brood); (3) queen status and presence; (4) queen oviposition rate; (5) supersedure rate; (6) egg hatch success; (7) mortality of developing larvae and pupae; (8) royal jelly deposition in wax comb cells; (9) worker longevity; (10) foraging activity; (11) treated bloom repellency to foragers; (12) colony overwintering success; (13) worker hypopharyngeal gland acini size; and (14) pathogen and parasite incidence and intensity. The results of these experiments and surveys showed that the propiconazole contact LD50 was 24,747 ppb. Residues of propiconazole were found to be commonly abundant on flowers in treated commercial fields after application with a mean concentration of 2083.8 ± 851.3 (se). The decay of propiconazole to non-detectable levels took about 40 days after application. The three-year hive deployment study showed that residues in treated fields were detected on flowers, pollen, and worker bees, demonstrating that exposure to this fungicide occurs even though it is applied before bloom. Also in the hive deployment study, evidence of reduced colony populations, increased supersedure, decreased queen oviposition rate, increased pathogen or parasite incidence and intensity, and increased overwintering colony loss due to propiconazole exposure was not found. However, propiconazole exposed colonies exhibited reduced worker longevity (17.3%), hypertrophy of 5 d old nurse bee hypopharyngeal acini (8.3%), and a 3.5 h repellency of foragers to treated bloom.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Fast and Easy Multiresidue Method Employing Acetonitrile Extraction/Partitioning and “Dispersive Solid-Phase Extraction” for the Determination of Pesticide Residues in Produce

          A simple, fast, and inexpensive method for the determination of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables is introduced. The procedure involves initial single-phase extraction of 10 g sample with 10 mL acetonitrile, followed by liquid–liquid partitioning formed by addition of 4 g anhydrous MgSO4 plus 1 g NaCl. Removal of residual water and cleanup are performed simultaneously by using a rapid procedure called dispersive solid-phase extraction (dispersive-SPE), in which 150 mg anhydrous MgSO4 and 25 mg primary secondary amine (PSA) sorbent are simply mixed with 1 mL acetonitrile extract. The dispersive-SPE with PSA effectively removes many polar matrix components, such as organic acids, certain polar pigments, and sugars, to some extent from the food extracts. Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) is then used for quantitative and confirmatory analysis of GC-amenable pesticides. Recoveries between 85 and 101% (mostly >95%) and repeatabilities typically <5% have been achieved for a wide range of fortified pesticides, including very polar and basic compounds such as methamidophos, acephate, omethoate, imazalil, and thiabendazole. Using this method, a single chemist can prepare a batch of 6 previously chopped samples in <30 min with approximately $1 (U.S.) of materials per sample.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Mechanism for the differential toxicity of neonicotinoid insecticides in the honey bee, Apis mellifera

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Honeybee foraging in differentially structured landscapes.

              Honeybees communicate the distance and location of resource patches by bee dances, but this spatial information has rarely been used to study their foraging ecology. We analysed, for the first time to the best of the authors' knowledge, foraging distances and dance activities of honeybees in relation to landscape structure, season and colony using a replicated experimental approach on a landscape scale. We compared three structurally simple landscapes characterized by a high proportion of arable land and large patches, with three complex landscapes with a high proportion of semi-natural perennial habitats and low mean patch size. Four observation hives were placed in the centre of the landscapes and switched at regular intervals between the six landscapes from the beginning of May to the end of July. A total of 1137 bee dances were observed and decoded. Overall mean foraging distance was 1526.1 +/- 37.2 m, the median 1181.5 m and range 62.1-10037.1 m. Mean foraging distances of all bees and foraging distances of nectar-collecting bees did not significantly differ between simple and complex landscapes, but varied between month and colonies. Foraging distances of pollen-collecting bees were significantly larger in simple (1743 +/- 95.6 m) than in complex landscapes (1543.4 +/- 71 m) and highest in June when resources were scarce. Dancing activity, i.e. the number of observed bee dances per unit time, was significantly higher in complex than in simple landscapes, presumably because of larger spatial and temporal variability of resource patches in complex landscapes. The results facilitate an understanding of how human landscape modification may change the evolutionary significance of bee dances and ecological interactions, such as pollination and competition between honeybees and other bee species.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                ABSGGL
                Agronomy
                Agronomy
                MDPI AG
                2073-4395
                December 2022
                December 05 2022
                : 12
                : 12
                : 3081
                Article
                10.3390/agronomy12123081
                c5e19791-c451-4bbd-af1f-616627bb3e76
                © 2022

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log