8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Brain Peak Width of Skeletonized Mean Diffusivity (PSMD) and Cognitive Function in Later Life

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          It is suggested that the brain’s peak width of skeletonized water mean diffusivity (PSMD) is a neuro-biomarker of processing speed, an important aspect of cognitive aging. We tested whether PSMD is more strongly correlated with processing speed than with other cognitive domains, and more strongly than other structural brain MRI indices. Participants were 731 Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 members, mean age = 73 years (SD = 0.7); analytical sample was 656–680. Cognitive domains tested were as follows: processing speed (5 tests), visuospatial (3), memory (3), and verbal (3). Brain-imaging variables included PSMD, white matter diffusion parameters, hyperintensity volumes, gray and white matter volumes, and perivascular spaces. PSMD was significantly associated with processing speed (−0.27), visuospatial ability (−0.23), memory ability (−0.17), and general cognitive ability (−0.25); comparable correlations were found with other brain-imaging measures. In a multivariable model with the other imaging variables, PSMD provided independent prediction of visuospatial ability and general cognitive ability. This incremental prediction, coupled with its ease to compute and possibly better tractability, might make PSMD a useful brain biomarker in studies of cognitive aging.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The Lothian Birth Cohort 1936: a study to examine influences on cognitive ageing from age 11 to age 70 and beyond

          Background Cognitive ageing is a major burden for society and a major influence in lowering people's independence and quality of life. It is the most feared aspect of ageing. There are large individual differences in age-related cognitive changes. Seeking the determinants of cognitive ageing is a research priority. A limitation of many studies is the lack of a sufficiently long period between cognitive assessments to examine determinants. Here, the aim is to examine influences on cognitive ageing between childhood and old age. Methods/Design The study is designed as a follow-up cohort study. The participants comprise surviving members of the Scottish Mental Survey of 1947 (SMS1947; N = 70,805) who reside in the Edinburgh area (Lothian) of Scotland. The SMS1947 applied a valid test of general intelligence to all children born in 1936 and attending Scottish schools in June 1947. A total of 1091 participants make up the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936. They undertook: a medical interview and examination; physical fitness testing; extensive cognitive testing (reasoning, memory, speed of information processing, and executive function); personality, quality of life and other psycho-social questionnaires; and a food frequency questionnaire. They have taken the same mental ability test (the Moray House Test No. 12) at age 11 and age 70. They provided blood samples for DNA extraction and testing and other biomarker analyses. Here we describe the background and aims of the study, the recruitment procedures and details of numbers tested, and the details of all examinations. Discussion The principal strength of this cohort is the rarely captured phenotype of lifetime cognitive change. There is additional rich information to examine the determinants of individual differences in this lifetime cognitive change. This protocol report is important in alerting other researchers to the data available in the cohort.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Update on cerebral small vessel disease: a dynamic whole-brain disease

            Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) is a very common neurological disease in older people. It causes stroke and dementia, mood disturbance and gait problems. Since it is difficult to visualise CSVD pathologies in vivo, the diagnosis of CSVD has relied on imaging findings including white matter hyperintensities, lacunar ischaemic stroke, lacunes, microbleeds, visible perivascular spaces and many haemorrhagic strokes. However, variations in the use of definition and terms of these features have probably caused confusion and difficulties in interpreting results of previous studies. A standardised use of terms should be encouraged in CSVD research. These CSVD features have long been regarded as different lesions, but emerging evidence has indicated that they might share some common intrinsic microvascular pathologies and therefore, owing to its diffuse nature, CSVD should be regarded as a ‘whole-brain disease’. Single antiplatelet (for acute lacunar ischaemic stroke) and management of traditional risk factors still remain the most important therapeutic and preventive approach, due to limited understanding of pathophysiology in CSVD. Increasing evidence suggests that new studies should consider drugs that target endothelium and blood–brain barrier to prevent and treat CSVD. Epidemiology of CSVD might differ in Asian compared with Western populations (where most results and guidelines about CSVD and stroke originate), but more community-based data and clear stratification of stroke types are required to address this.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Cerebral Perivascular Spaces Visible on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Development of a Qualitative Rating Scale and its Observer Reliability

              Background Perivascular spaces (PVS) are an important component of cerebral small vessel disease (SVD), several inflammatory disorders, hypertension and blood-brain barrier breakdown, but are difficult to quantify. A recent international collaboration of SVD experts has highlighted the need for a robust, easy-to-use PVS rating scale for the effective investigation of the diagnostic and prognostic significance of PVS. The purpose of the current study was to develop and extend existing PVS scales to provide a more comprehensive scale for the measurement of PVS in the basal ganglia, centrum semiovale and midbrain, and to test its intra- and inter-rater agreement, assessing reasons for discrepancy. Methods We reviewed previously published PVS scales, including site of PVS assessed, rating method, and size and morphological criteria. Retaining key features, we devised a more comprehensive scale in order to improve the reliability of PVS rating. Two neuroradiologists tested the new scale in MRI brain scans of 60 patients from two studies (stroke, ageing population), chosen to represent a full range of PVS, and demonstrating concomitant features of SVD such as lacunes and white matter hyperintensities. We rated basal ganglia, centrum semiovale, and midbrain PVS. Basal ganglia and centrum semiovale PVS were rated 0 (none), 1 (1–10), 2 (11–20), 3 (21–40) and 4 (>40), and midbrain PVS were rated 0 (none visible) or 1 (visible). We calculated kappa statistics for rating, assessed consistency in use of PVS categories (Bhapkar test) and reviewed sources of discrepancy. Results Intra- and inter-rater kappa statistics were highest for basal ganglia PVS (range 0.76–0.87 and 0.8–0.9, respectively) than for centrum semiovale PVS (range 0.68–0.75 and 0.61–0.8, respectively) or midbrain PVS (inter-rater range 0.51–0.52). Inter-rater consistency was better for basal ganglia compared to centrum semiovale PVS (Bhapkar statistic 2.49–3.72, compared to 6.79–21.08, respectively). Most inter-rater disagreements were due to very faint PVS, coexisting extensive white matter hyperintensities (WMH) or the presence of lacunes. Conclusions We developed a more inclusive and robust visual PVS rating scale allowing rating of all grades of PVS severity on structural brain imaging. The revised PVS rating scale has good observer reliability for basal ganglia and centrum semiovale PVS, best for basal ganglia PVS, and moderate reliability for midbrain PVS. Agreement is influenced by PVS severity and the presence of background features of SVD. The current scale can be used in further studies to assess the clinical implications of PVS.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/709763
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/403729
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/38553
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/14660
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/64375
                Journal
                Front Psychiatry
                Front Psychiatry
                Front. Psychiatry
                Frontiers in Psychiatry
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-0640
                26 July 2019
                2019
                : 10
                : 524
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh, United Kingdom
                [2] 2Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh, United Kingdom
                [3] 3Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Research Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London , London, United Kingdom
                [4] 4Brain Research Imaging Centre, Division of Neuroimaging Sciences, University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh, United Kingdom
                [5] 5Scottish Imaging Network, A Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE), University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh, United Kingdom
                [6] 6Edinburgh Dementia Research Centre, Dementia Research Institute, University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh, United Kingdom
                [7] 7Alzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh, United Kingdom
                Author notes

                Edited by: Mohamad Habes, University of Pennsylvania, United States

                Reviewed by: Anil Man Tuladhar, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Netherlands; Owen Williams, National Institute on Aging (NIA), United States

                *Correspondence: Ian J. Deary, i.deary@ 123456ed.ac.uk

                This article was submitted to Aging Psychiatry, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry

                †Deceased

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00524
                6676305
                31402877
                c5fbeac7-9422-418e-a0fe-0d9164cfd95e
                Copyright © 2019 Deary, Ritchie, Muñoz Maniega, Cox, Valdés Hernández, Luciano, Starr, Wardlaw and Bastin

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 02 April 2019
                : 03 July 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 54, Pages: 10, Words: 5685
                Funding
                Funded by: Age UK 10.13039/501100000629
                Funded by: Medical Research Council 10.13039/501100000265
                Funded by: Scottish Funding Council 10.13039/501100000360
                Categories
                Psychiatry
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                aging,cognition,processing speed,structural mri,diffusion mri,white matter,psmd

                Comments

                Comment on this article