81
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Brief learning induces a memory bias for arousing-negative words: an fMRI study in high and low trait anxious persons

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Persons suffering from anxiety disorders display facilitated processing of arousing and negative stimuli, such as negative words. This memory bias is reflected in better recall and increased amygdala activity in response to such stimuli. However, individual learning histories were not considered in most studies, a concern that we meet here. Thirty-four female persons (half with high-, half with low trait anxiety) participated in a criterion-based associative word-learning paradigm, in which neutral pseudowords were paired with aversive or neutral pictures, which should lead to a valence change for the negatively paired pseudowords. After learning, pseudowords were tested with fMRI to investigate differential brain activation of the amygdala evoked by the newly acquired valence. Explicit and implicit memory was assessed directly after training and in three follow-ups at 4-day intervals. The behavioral results demonstrate that associative word-learning leads to an explicit (but no implicit) memory bias for negatively linked pseudowords, relative to neutral ones, which confirms earlier studies. Bilateral amygdala activation underlines the behavioral effect: Higher trait anxiety is correlated with stronger amygdala activation for negatively linked pseudowords than for neutrally linked ones. Most interestingly, this effect is also present for negatively paired pseudowords that participants could not remember well. Moreover, neutrally paired pseudowords evoked higher amygdala reactivity than completely novel ones in highly anxious persons, which can be taken as evidence for generalization. These findings demonstrate that few word-learning trials generate a memory bias for emotional stimuli, indexed both behaviorally and neurophysiologically. Importantly, the typical memory bias for emotional stimuli and the generalization to neutral ones is larger in high anxious persons.

          Related collections

          Most cited references80

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential.

          The Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) is a non-verbal pictorial assessment technique that directly measures the pleasure, arousal, and dominance associated with a person's affective reaction to a wide variety of stimuli. In this experiment, we compare reports of affective experience obtained using SAM, which requires only three simple judgments, to the Semantic Differential scale devised by Mehrabian and Russell (An approach to environmental psychology, 1974) which requires 18 different ratings. Subjective reports were measured to a series of pictures that varied in both affective valence and intensity. Correlations across the two rating methods were high both for reports of experienced pleasure and felt arousal. Differences obtained in the dominance dimension of the two instruments suggest that SAM may better track the personal response to an affective stimulus. SAM is an inexpensive, easy method for quickly assessing reports of affective response in many contexts.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants.

              Learners rely on a combination of experience-independent and experience-dependent mechanisms to extract information from the environment. Language acquisition involves both types of mechanisms, but most theorists emphasize the relative importance of experience-independent mechanisms. The present study shows that a fundamental task of language acquisition, segmentation of words from fluent speech, can be accomplished by 8-month-old infants based solely on the statistical relationships between neighboring speech sounds. Moreover, this word segmentation was based on statistical learning from only 2 minutes of exposure, suggesting that infants have access to a powerful mechanism for the computation of statistical properties of the language input.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                21 August 2015
                2015
                : 6
                : 1226
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Institute of Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University Hospital of Münster Münster, Germany
                [2] 2Institute of Psychology, University of Münster Münster, Germany
                [3] 3Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Münster Münster, Germany
                [4] 4Department of Psycholinguistics and Cognitive Neurosciences, Institute of Psychology, University of Münster Münster, Germany
                [5] 5Department of Clinical Radiology, University of Münster Münster, Germany
                [6] 6University of Hong Kong Hong Kong, Hong Kong
                [7] 7kbo-Inn-Salzach Clinic, Academic Hospital of Psychiatry, Psychotheray and Neurology Wasserburg am Inn, Germany
                [8] 8Department of Psychology, University of Bielefeld Bielefeld, Germany
                [9] 9Department of Otolaryngology, Jena University Hospital Jena, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Cornelia Herbert, University Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen, Germany

                Reviewed by: Christoph Scheepers, University of Glasgow, UK; Hsu-Wen Huang, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan

                *Correspondence: Annuschka S. Eden, Institute of Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University Hospital of Münster, Malmedyweg 15, 48143 Münster, NRW, Germany, annuschka.eden@ 123456uni-muenster.de ; Christian Dobel, Department of Psychology, University of Bielefeld, P.O. Box 10 01 31, D-33501 Bielefeld, Germany, Christian.Dobel@ 123456Uni-Bielefeld.de

                This article was submitted to Language Sciences, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01226
                4543815
                c61c549a-758e-4055-b1ee-9555fa40b5c6
                Copyright © 2015 Eden, Dehmelt, Bischoff, Zwitserlood, Kugel, Keuper, Zwanzger and Dobel.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 13 February 2015
                : 03 August 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 112, Pages: 15, Words: 0
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                trait anxiety,fmri,emotions,memory bias,consolidation,statistical word-learning,amygdala

                Comments

                Comment on this article