Blog
About

0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Changes in Mini-Mental State Exam in Community-Dwelling Older Persons over 6 Years: Relationship to Health and Neuropsychological Measures

      a , b , b

      Neuroepidemiology

      S. Karger AG

      Health, Aging, Dementia, Cognition, Neuropsychology

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Although cognitive screening test scores change with advanced age, the significance of these changes (particularly decline in score) needs to be defined in terms of general health and neuropsychological functioning. Such analysis was undertaken in a subgroup of 287 healthy older men (mean age at baseline = 70.7 years) from the Western Collaborative Group Study, an ongoing cardiovascular and aging research project. Time from baseline to follow-up study averaged 6.0 years (SD = 0.5 years). Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores indicated that 15% of participants declined by three or more points (a 1+ standard deviation change among all change scores), 5% of participants improved by three or more points, and 80% of the sample remained within two points of their initial score. In health terms, decliners were significantly older, less active at follow-up, rated their health more poorly, and reported more depressive symptoms than non-decliners. Decliners also performed more poorly on several neuropsychological tests administered at follow-up. Results suggest that a decline of three or more points on the MMSE in community-dwelling, older persons without acute illness may signify important changes in health and cognition.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 2

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Evaluation of two new neuropsychological tests designed to minimize cultural bias in the assessment of HIV-1 seropositive persons: a WHO study.

           M Zaudig,  P Satz,  L D'Elia (1993)
          In the course of the preparatory work for the WHO cross-cultural study on the neuropsychiatric aspects of HIV-I infection, two new neuropsychological tests (the WHO/UCLA Auditory Verbal Learning Test and the Color Trails 1 & 2) were developed. The evaluation of these tests was performed at four sites, two in developed and two in developing countries. The data obtained suggest that the tests are more culture fair than others currently used to assess the same functional domains, that they are sensitive to HIV-1-associated cognitive impairment, and that this sensitivity "holds" across different cultures.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Mini-Mental State Exam Status of Community-Dwelling Cognitively Intact Centenarians

              Bookmark

              Author and article information

              Journal
              NED
              Neuroepidemiology
              10.1159/issn.0251-5350
              Neuroepidemiology
              S. Karger AG
              0251-5350
              1423-0208
              2003
              February 2003
              13 January 2003
              : 22
              : 1
              : 23-30
              Affiliations
              aDepartments of Medicine (Division of Neurology) and Behavioral Science, Penn State University College of Medicine, The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pa., USA, and bCenter for Health Sciences, SRI International, Menlo Park, Calif., USA
              Article
              67113 Neuroepidemiology 2003;22:23–30
              10.1159/000067113
              12566950
              © 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel

              Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

              Page count
              Tables: 3, References: 44, Pages: 8
              Categories
              Original Paper

              Comments

              Comment on this article