17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prevalence and determinants of noise‐induced hearing loss among workers in the automotive industry in China: A pilot study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Data on noise‐induced hearing loss (NIHL) in the automotive industry are rare. This pilot study aimed to investigate the prevalence and determinants of NIHL among workers in the automotive industry in China.

          Methods

          A cross‐sectional survey was conducted with 6557 participants from the automotive industry. The questionnaire survey was administered, and individual noise exposure level (L Aeq.8h) and hearing loss level were measured.

          Results

          Of participants, 96.43% were male; the median age was 27.0 years and 28.82% had NIHL defined as adjusted high‐frequency noise‐induced hearing loss (AHFNIHL). Concerning individual noise levels (L Aeq.8h), 62.53% exceeded 85 dB(A), which were mainly concentrated in various jobs, including metal cutting, surface treatment, stamping, welding, grinding, assembly, plastic molding, and forging. Each typical noise source generated its own unique temporal waveform shape with the type of non‐Gaussian noise. Of workers, 53.15% regularly used hearing protector devices (HPD), and the proportion of regular HPD use increased with L Aeq.8h. The trend test showed that the prevalence of AHFNIHL in male workers significantly increased with an increase in L Aeq.8h at <94 dB(A) and cumulative noise exposure (CNE) in each age group ( P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). A logistic regression analysis showed that CNE and HPD usage frequency were important factors contributing to AHFNIHL.

          Conclusions

          CNE and HPD usage frequency were the determinants for NIHL. Much more human surveys are needed to understand the prevalence and determinants of NIHL in the automotive industry in China.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Understanding and preventing noise-induced hearing loss.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Hearing loss among operating engineers in American construction industry.

            Occupational noise exposure and noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) among construction workers has long been recognized as a problem in the United States, yet little is known about the prevalence of NIHL among American construction workers. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and characteristics of hearing loss among operating engineers (OEs) who operate heavy construction machinery. As a part of hearing protection intervention, an audiometric test was conducted for both ears at frequencies 0.5 through 8 kHz in the soundproof booth. Prior to the audiometric test, a paper-pencil pre-hearing test questionnaire was administered and an otoscopic examination was completed. Prevalence of hearing loss was determined based on hearing threshold levels (HTLs) in the worst ear with a low fence of 25 dB. A total of 623 workers were included in the analysis and they were predominantly middle-aged Caucasian males (mean age = 43 years, Caucasian = 90%, male = 92%). Over 60% of OEs showed hearing loss in the noise-sensitive higher frequencies of 4 and 6 kHz. The rate of hearing loss was particularly higher among workers who reported longer years of working in the construction industry. Workers showed significantly poorer hearing in the left ear, and a typical characteristic of NIHL, a V-notch at 4 or 6 kHz, was not shown in this population. Thirty-eight percent reported ringing/buzzing in the ear and 62% indicated having problems in understanding what people say in loud noise. Average reported use of hearing protection devices (HPDs) was 48% of the time they were required to be used. Significant inverse relationship was found between higher frequency (4-6 kHz) hearing loss and use of HPDs (r =-0.134, p < 0.001). Workers using HPDs more had significantly better hearing than those who did not. The study demonstrated a significant NIHL problem and low use of HPDs in OEs. An effective hearing conservation program, including a periodic audiometric testing and hearing protection intervention, for this study population should be in place.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A retrospective analysis of noise-induced hearing loss in the Dutch construction industry

              Purpose Noise exposure is an important and highly prevalent occupational hazard in the construction industry. This study examines hearing threshold levels of a large population of Dutch construction workers and compares their hearing thresholds to those predicted by ISO-1999. Methods In this retrospective study, medical records of periodic occupational health examinations of 29,644 construction workers are analysed. Pure-tone audiometric thresholds of noise-exposed workers are compared to a non-exposed control group and to ISO-1999 predictions. Regression analyses are conducted to explore the relationship between hearing loss and noise intensity, noise exposure time and the use of hearing protection. Results Noise-exposed workers had greater hearing losses compared to their non-noise-exposed colleagues and to the reference population reported in ISO-1999. Noise exposure explained only a small proportion of hearing loss. When the daily noise exposure level rose from 80 dB(A) towards 96 dB(A), only a minor increase in hearing loss is shown. The relation of exposure time and hearing loss found was similar to ISO-1999 predictions when looking at durations of 10 years or more. For the first decade, the population medians show poorer hearing than predicted by ISO-1999. Discussion Duration of noise exposure was a better predictor than noise exposure levels, probably because of the limitations in noise exposure estimations. In this population, noise-induced hearing loss was already present at the beginning of employment and increased at the same rate as is predicted for longer exposure durations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                huwj@niohp.chinacdc.cn
                Journal
                J Occup Health
                J Occup Health
                10.1002/(ISSN)1348-9585
                JOH2
                Journal of Occupational Health
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1341-9145
                1348-9585
                10 June 2019
                September 2019
                : 61
                : 5 ( doiID: 10.1002/joh2.v61.5 )
                : 387-397
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention National Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control Beijing China
                [ 2 ] Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention Hangzhou China
                [ 3 ] Auditory Research Laboratories State University of New York at Plattsburgh Plattsburgh New York
                [ 4 ] Wuhan Prevention and Treatment Center for Occupational Disease Wuhan China
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Weijiang Hu, National Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 29 Nanwei Road, Beijing, China.

                Email: huwj@ 123456niohp.chinacdc.cn

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6839-737X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8354-2862
                Article
                JOH212066
                10.1002/1348-9585.12066
                6718839
                31183937
                c66fc9be-e580-4434-a92d-1a628171dcfb
                © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Occupational Health published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japan Society for Occupational Health

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 18 January 2019
                : 20 April 2019
                : 22 May 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 3, Pages: 11, Words: 7418
                Funding
                Funded by: Program of Occupational Health Risk Assessment of China NIOHP
                Award ID: 131031109000160004
                Funded by: Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province of China
                Award ID: 2015C03039
                Funded by: Zhejiang Provincial Program for the Cultivation of High‐level Innovative Health Talents
                Categories
                Original Article
                Originals
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                joh212066
                September 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.6.8 mode:remove_FC converted:03.09.2019

                automotive industry,determinants,hearing loss,noise,prevalence

                Comments

                Comment on this article