12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Context-dependent impacts of anthropogenic noise on individual and social behaviour in a cooperatively breeding fish

      ,
      Animal Behaviour
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms.

          Growth in transportation networks, resource extraction, motorized recreation and urban development is responsible for chronic noise exposure in most terrestrial areas, including remote wilderness sites. Increased noise levels reduce the distance and area over which acoustic signals can be perceived by animals. Here, we review a broad range of findings that indicate the potential severity of this threat to diverse taxa, and recent studies that document substantial changes in foraging and anti-predator behavior, reproductive success, density and community structure in response to noise. Effective management of protected areas must include noise assessment, and research is needed to further quantify the ecological consequences of chronic noise exposure in terrestrial environments.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Broodcare helpers in the cichlid fish Lamprologus brichardi: Their costs and benefits

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Selfish sentinels in cooperative mammals.

              Like humans engaged in risky activities, group members of some animal societies take turns acting as sentinels. Explanations of the evolution of sentinel behavior have frequently relied on kin selection or reciprocal altruism, but recent models suggest that guarding may be an individual's optimal activity once its stomach is full if no other animal is on guard. This paper provides support for this last explanation by showing that, in groups of meerkats (Suricata suricatta), animals guard from safe sites, and solitary individuals as well as group members spend part of their time on guard. Though individuals seldom take successive guarding bouts, there is no regular rota, and the provision of food increases contributions to guarding and reduces the latency between bouts by the same individual.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Animal Behaviour
                Animal Behaviour
                Elsevier BV
                00033472
                June 2013
                June 2013
                : 85
                : 6
                : 1343-1349
                Article
                10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.03.025
                c6971d1e-2f6f-444f-a129-7f94bf1e4e5c
                © 2013
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article