59
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Dynamic Analysis of Stochastic Transcription Cycles

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cycling of gene expression in individual cells is controlled by dynamic chromatin remodeling.

          Abstract

          In individual mammalian cells the expression of some genes such as prolactin is highly variable over time and has been suggested to occur in stochastic pulses. To investigate the origins of this behavior and to understand its functional relevance, we quantitatively analyzed this variability using new mathematical tools that allowed us to reconstruct dynamic transcription rates of different reporter genes controlled by identical promoters in the same living cell. Quantitative microscopic analysis of two reporter genes, firefly luciferase and destabilized EGFP, was used to analyze the dynamics of prolactin promoter-directed gene expression in living individual clonal and primary pituitary cells over periods of up to 25 h. We quantified the time-dependence and cyclicity of the transcription pulses and estimated the length and variation of active and inactive transcription phases. We showed an average cycle period of approximately 11 h and demonstrated that while the measured time distribution of active phases agreed with commonly accepted models of transcription, the inactive phases were differently distributed and showed strong memory, with a refractory period of transcriptional inactivation close to 3 h. Cycles in transcription occurred at two distinct prolactin-promoter controlled reporter genes in the same individual clonal or primary cells. However, the timing of the cycles was independent and out-of-phase. For the first time, we have analyzed transcription dynamics from two equivalent loci in real-time in single cells. In unstimulated conditions, cells showed independent transcription dynamics at each locus. A key result from these analyses was the evidence for a minimum refractory period in the inactive-phase of transcription. The response to acute signals and the result of manipulation of histone acetylation was consistent with the hypothesis that this refractory period corresponded to a phase of chromatin remodeling which significantly increased the cyclicity. Stochastically timed bursts of transcription in an apparently random subset of cells in a tissue may thus produce an overall coordinated but heterogeneous phenotype capable of acute responses to stimuli.

          Author Summary

          Timing of biological processes such as gene transcription is crucial to ensure that cells and tissues respond appropriately to their environment. Until recently it was assumed that most cells in a tissue responded in a similar way, and that changes in cellular activity were relatively stable. However, studies of messenger RNA and protein levels in single cells have shown the presence of considerable heterogeneity. This suggested that transcription in single cells may be highly dynamic over time. Using a combined experimental and theoretical approach, with time-lapse imaging of reporter gene expression over 25 h periods, we measured the rate of prolactin gene transcription in single pituitary cells and detected clear cycles of transcriptional activity. Mathematical analysis, using a binary model that assumed transcription was on or off, showed that these cycles were characterized by a minimum refractory period that involved chromatin remodeling. The timing of transcription from two different reporter constructs driven by identical promoters in the same cell was out-of-phase, suggesting that the pulses of gene expression are due to processes intrinsic to expression of a particular gene and not to environmental effects. We further show that the pulses of transcription are independent chromatin cycles at each gene locus. Therefore, heterogeneous patterns of gene expression may facilitate flexible transcriptional responses in cells within intact tissue, while maintaining a well-regulated average level of gene expression in the resting state.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Oscillations in NF-kappaB signaling control the dynamics of gene expression.

          Signaling by the transcription factor nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappaB) involves its release from inhibitor kappa B (IkappaB) in the cytosol, followed by translocation into the nucleus. NF-kappaB regulation of IkappaBalpha transcription represents a delayed negative feedback loop that drives oscillations in NF-kappaB translocation. Single-cell time-lapse imaging and computational modeling of NF-kappaB (RelA) localization showed asynchronous oscillations following cell stimulation that decreased in frequency with increased IkappaBalpha transcription. Transcription of target genes depended on oscillation persistence, involving cycles of RelA phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. The functional consequences of NF-kappaB signaling may thus depend on number, period, and amplitude of oscillations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Dynamics of the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop in individual cells.

            The tumor suppressor p53, one of the most intensely investigated proteins, is usually studied by experiments that are averaged over cell populations, potentially masking the dynamic behavior in individual cells. We present a system for following, in individual living cells, the dynamics of p53 and its negative regulator Mdm2 (refs. 1,4-7): this system uses functional p53-CFP and Mdm2-YFP fusion proteins and time-lapse fluorescence microscopy. We found that p53 was expressed in a series of discrete pulses after DNA damage. Genetically identical cells had different numbers of pulses: zero, one, two or more. The mean height and duration of each pulse were fixed and did not depend on the amount of DNA damage. The mean number of pulses, however, increased with DNA damage. This approach can be used to study other signaling systems and suggests that the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop generates a 'digital' clock that releases well-timed quanta of p53 until damage is repaired or the cell dies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Nuclear organization of the genome and the potential for gene regulation.

              Much work has been published on the cis-regulatory elements that affect gene function locally, as well as on the biochemistry of the transcription factors and chromatin- and histone-modifying complexes that influence gene expression. However, surprisingly little information is available about how these components are organized within the three-dimensional space of the nucleus. Technological advances are now helping to identify the spatial relationships and interactions of genes and regulatory elements in the nucleus and are revealing an unexpectedly extensive network of communication within and between chromosomes. A crucial unresolved issue is the extent to which this organization affects gene function, rather than just reflecting it.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Biol
                plos
                plosbiol
                PLoS Biology
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1544-9173
                1545-7885
                April 2011
                April 2011
                12 April 2011
                : 9
                : 4
                : e1000607
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Cell Imaging, School of Biological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
                [2 ]Department of Statistics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
                [3 ]Warwick Systems Biology Centre, University of Warwick, United Kingdom
                [4 ]Endocrinology Group, School of Biomedicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
                [5 ]Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
                Johns Hopkins University, United States of America
                Author notes

                The author(s) have made the following declarations about their contributions: Conceived and designed the experiments: MRHW JRED CVH. Performed the experiments: CVH. Analyzed the data: CVH BF DJW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SF SS JJM DGS LA. Wrote the paper: MRHW CVH DAR JRED. Managed the Centre for Cell Imaging: DGS. Designed and developed the statistical algorithms: BF DJW. Prepared the supporting information: BF CVH DJW. Planned and led the mathematical analysis: DAR. Initiated and directed the project: MRHW JRED.

                ¤: Current address: Michael Smith Building, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

                Article
                10-PLBI-RA-8367R2
                10.1371/journal.pbio.1000607
                3075210
                21532732
                c6a28a80-f46b-41e8-a676-4f7c9d2979a7
                Harper et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
                History
                : 12 July 2010
                : 24 February 2011
                Page count
                Pages: 14
                Categories
                Research Article
                Cell Biology/Gene Expression
                Computational Biology/Systems Biology
                Computational Biology/Transcriptional Regulation

                Life sciences
                Life sciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article