19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Mothers' responses to sons and daughters engaging in injury-risk behaviors on a playground: implications for sex differences in injury rates.

      1 ,
      Journal of experimental child psychology
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Videotapes of children engaging in injury-risk activities on a playground were shown to mothers, who were asked to intervene by stopping the tape and saying whatever they would to their child in the situation shown. Results revealed that mothers of daughters were more likely to judge behaviors as posing some degree of injury risk, and they intervened more frequently and quickly than mothers of sons. Mothers' speed to intervene positively correlated with both children's injury history and their risk-taking tendencies, indicating that mothers of children who were previously injured and who often engaged in injury-risk behaviors had a higher degree of tolerance for children's risk taking than mothers of children who experienced fewer injuries and less frequently engaged in injury-risk behaviors. Mothers' verbalizations to children's risk taking revealed that daughters received more cautions and statements communicating vulnerability for injury, whereas sons received more statements encouraging risk-taking behavior.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Exp Child Psychol
          Journal of experimental child psychology
          Elsevier BV
          0022-0965
          0022-0965
          Jun 2000
          : 76
          : 2
          Affiliations
          [1 ] University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
          Article
          S0022-0965(00)92572-4
          10.1006/jecp.2000.2572
          10788304
          c74efde3-44b9-433d-b6ca-4044d3010999
          Copyright 2000 Academic Press.
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article