14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Effect of 1 or 2 Doses of Inclisiran on Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels : One-Year Follow-up of the ORION-1 Randomized Clinical Trial

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Can inclisiran reduce mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) exposure with an infrequent dosing regimen, thereby offering sustained LDL-C lowering with infrequent dosing? In this prespecified analysis of a randomized clinical trial, 1 dose of inclisiran lowered time-averaged LDL-C levels over 1 year by 29.5% to 38.7%, and 2 doses at day 1 and day 90 lowered time-averaged LDL-C over 1 year by 29.9% to 46.4% in a dose-dependent manner. A 50% LDL-C reduction was maintained for at least 6 months after 2 doses of 300 mg on day 1 and day 90. Through potent and durable lowering of LDL-C with a twice-a-year dosing regimen, inclisiran could offer a sustained lipid-lowering therapeutic option in the future. Sustained reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with lipid-lowering therapies that require frequent dosing are reliant on patient adherence, and poor adherence is associated with worse clinical outcomes. To determine whether inclisiran, a small interfering RNA, reduces mean LDL-C exposure with an infrequent dosing regimen. Prespecified analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter phase 2 clinical trial. Participants were followed up monthly for LDL-C levels and proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) measurements as well as safety until their LDL-C levels had returned to within 20% of their change from baseline (maximum 360 days). The study included patients with elevated LDL-C despite maximally tolerated statin therapy. Data were analyzed between January 11, 2016, and June 7, 2017. One dose (200, 300, or 500 mg on day 1) or 2 doses (100, 200, or 300 mg on days 1 and 90) of inclisiran sodium or placebo. Duration of time to return to within 20% of change from baseline for LDL-C levels and time-averaged LDL-C reductions over 1 year. At baseline, among the 501 participants, 65% were men (n = 326 of 501), mean age was 63 years, 6% had familial hypercholesterolemia (n = 28 of 501), and 69% had established ASCVD (n = 347 of 501). Baseline LDL-C was 128 mg/dL among 501 randomized participants. The percentage of participants who were followed up to day 360 because their LDL-C levels had not returned to within 20% of their change from baseline ranged from 48.3% to 65.0% for those receiving a single dose and between 55.9% and 83.1% of those receiving 2 doses, with similar effects observed for PCSK9. Time-averaged reduction in LDL-C levels over 1 year after a single dose ranged from 29.5% to 38.7% ( P  < .001 between groups) and from 29.9% to 46.4% ( P  < .001 between groups) for those who received 2 doses. The 2-dose 300-mg regimen produced the highest proportion of responders at day 360 and the greatest mean reduction in LDL-C over 1 year. Incidence of adverse events was similar through to 1 year. Treatment with inclisiran resulted in durable reductions in LDL-C over 1 year. Inclisiran may offer a novel approach to LDL-C reduction with the convenience of infrequent dosing. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02597127 This prespecified analysis of a randomized clinical trial analyzes whether inclisiran, a small interfering RNA, reduces mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol exposure with an infrequent dosing regimen.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A systematic review of barriers to medication adherence in the elderly: looking beyond cost and regimen complexity.

          Medication nonadherence is a common problem among the elderly. To conduct a systematic review of the published literature describing potential nonfinancial barriers to medication adherence among the elderly. The PubMed and PsychINFO databases were searched for articles published in English between January 1998 and January 2010 that (1) described "predictors," "facilitators," or "determinants" of medication adherence or that (2) examined the "relationship" between a specific barrier and adherence for elderly patients (ie, ≥65 years of age) in the United States. A manual search of the reference lists of identified articles and the authors' files and recent review articles was conducted. The search included articles that (1) reviewed specific barriers to medication adherence and did not solely describe nonmodifiable predictors of adherence (eg, demographics, marital status), (2) were not interventions designed to address adherence, (3) defined adherence or compliance and specified its method of measurement, and (4) involved US participants only. Nonsystematic reviews were excluded, as were studies that focused specifically on people who were homeless or substance abusers, or patients with psychotic disorders, tuberculosis, or HIV infection, because of the unique circumstances that surround medication adherence for each of these populations. Nine studies met inclusion criteria for this review. Four studies used pharmacy records or claims data to assess adherence, 2 studies used pill count or electronic monitoring, and 3 studies used other methods to assess adherence. Substantial heterogeneity existed among the populations studied as well as among the measures of adherence, barriers addressed, and significant findings. Some potential barriers (ie, factors associated with nonadherence) were identified from the studies, including patient-related factors such as disease-related knowledge, health literacy, and cognitive function; drug-related factors such as adverse effects and polypharmacy; and other factors including the patient-provider relationship and various logistical barriers to obtaining medications. None of the reviewed studies examined primary nonadherence or nonpersistence. Medication nonadherence in the elderly is not well described in the literature, despite being a major cause of morbidity, and thus it is difficult to draw a systematic conclusion on potential barriers based on the current literature. Future research should focus on standardizing medication adherence measurements among the elderly to gain a better understanding of this important issue. Published by EM Inc USA.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Hyperlipidemia in early adulthood increases long-term risk of coronary heart disease.

            Many young adults with moderate hyperlipidemia do not meet statin treatment criteria under the new American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology cholesterol guidelines because they focus on 10-year cardiovascular risk. We evaluated the association between years of exposure to hypercholesterolemia in early adulthood and future coronary heart disease (CHD) risk.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cholesterol variability and the risk of mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke: a nationwide population-based study.

              A high visit-to-visit variability in cholesterol levels has been suggested to be an independent predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Because whether this notion applies to general population is not known, we aimed to investigate the associations between total cholesterol (TC) variability and the risk of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Cardiology
                JAMA Cardiol
                American Medical Association (AMA)
                2380-6583
                November 01 2019
                November 01 2019
                : 4
                : 11
                : 1067
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Imperial Centre for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, London, England
                [2 ]The Medicines Company, Parsippany, New Jersey
                [3 ]Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University, Nabeshima, Saga, Japan
                [4 ]University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [5 ]Charité-Universitats medizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
                [6 ]Department of Cardiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
                [7 ]University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
                Article
                10.1001/jamacardio.2019.3502
                6763983
                31553410
                c78bc1ae-7cfa-4f91-9351-04ce8de98149
                © 2019
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log