Blog
About

0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Long QT syndrome: reduced repolarization reserve and the genetic link.

      Journal of Internal Medicine

      physiopathology, genetics, Torsades de Pointes, adverse effects, Terfenadine, Risk Factors, blood, Quinidine, Polymorphism, Genetic, Male, Long QT Syndrome, Humans, Histamine H1 Antagonists, Genotype, Female, Disease Susceptibility, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Marked QT prolongation and torsades de pointes can occur not only in the congenital long QT syndromes (LQTSs) but also as a consequence of environmental stimuli, notably administration of certain drugs. A key feature of this 'acquired' form of the LQTS has been its unpredictable nature. That is, although risk factors have been identified in series of patients, they have not been terribly useful in addressing risk in an individual patient. Normal cardiac repolarization depends critically on the interplay of multiple ion currents, and these provide some redundancy, or 'reserve', to protect against excessive QT prolongation by drugs. We have proposed that lesions in these repolarizing mechanisms can remain subclinical but nevertheless increase risk on drug exposure, and have termed this situation 'reduced repolarization reserve'. The evidence in support of this concept is presented, and the known and potential contributions by genetic variants to risk is examined. Assessing variability in susceptibility to acquired LQTS provides a framework for analysis of other complex gene-environment interactions.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          10.1111/j.1365-2796.2005.01589.x
          16336514

          Comments

          Comment on this article