90
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    5
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Acquisition Path of [w]-final Plurals in Brazilian Portuguese

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The plural of Brazilian Portuguese [w]-final nouns includes an alternation with [j], but the change is partially blocked in monosyllables and following a tense vowel ( Becker et al. 2017). In this paper, we present a nonce word study with 115 children ages 7–13 and 43 adults, all participants from the state of São Paulo, showing that blocking in monosyllables is acquired earlier than blocking by tense vowels. We claim that sensitivity to monosyllabicity and vowel tenseness are both due to universal phonological pressures, but the effect of vowel tenseness is learned more slowly because it is limited to the plural morphology in this language.

          Our results from nonce words are convergent with evidence from innovative plurals and loanword adaptation, showing the primacy of phonological factors over history, orthography, and lexical frequency when it comes to alternations and their acquisition.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Child's Learning of English Morphology

          Jean Berko (2015)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Maximum Entropy Model of Phonotactics and Phonotactic Learning

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study.

              Are morphological patterns learned in the form of rules? Some models deny this, attributing all morphology to analogical mechanisms. The dual mechanism model (Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1998). On language and connectionism: analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition, 28, 73-193) posits that speakers do internalize rules, but that these rules are few and cover only regular processes; the remaining patterns are attributed to analogy. This article advocates a third approach, which uses multiple stochastic rules and no analogy. We propose a model that employs inductive learning to discover multiple rules, and assigns them confidence scores based on their performance in the lexicon. Our model is supported over the two alternatives by new "wug test" data on English past tenses, which show that participant ratings of novel pasts depend on the phonological shape of the stem, both for irregulars and, surprisingly, also for regulars. The latter observation cannot be explained under the dual mechanism approach, which derives all regulars with a single rule. To evaluate the alternative hypothesis that all morphology is analogical, we implemented a purely analogical model, which evaluates novel pasts based solely on their similarity to existing verbs. Tested against experimental data, this analogical model also failed in key respects: it could not locate patterns that require abstract structural characterizations, and it favored implausible responses based on single, highly similar exemplars. We conclude that speakers extend morphological patterns based on abstract structural properties, of a kind appropriately described with rules.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                2397-5563
                Journal of Portuguese Linguistics
                Ubiquity Press
                2397-5563
                23 April 2018
                2018
                : 17
                : 4
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Stony Brook University, US
                [2 ]Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, BR
                [3 ]University College London, UK
                [4 ]Universidade Estadual de Campinas, BR
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9012-2209
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5318-5596
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4595-7765
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3628-6939
                Article
                10.5334/jpl.189
                c7d1f2b0-b0e3-4167-9e9a-f0266d9f96e4
                Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 30 September 2017
                : 11 March 2018
                Categories
                Research paper

                Linguistics & Semiotics,Languages of Europe
                acquisition,lax vowels,monosyllables,wug test,gradual learning,plural morphology,Brazilian Portuguese

                Comments

                Comment on this article