16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Adherence to hydroxyurea, health-related quality of life domains, and patients’ perceptions of sickle cell disease and hydroxyurea: a cross-sectional study in adolescents and young adults

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Sickle cell disease (SCD) patients have impaired domains of health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Hydroxyurea is safe and efficacious in SCD; however, adherence is suboptimal, and patients’ perceptions are poorly understood amongst adolescents and young adults (AYA). Study objectives were to: (1) examine patients’ perceptions of SCD and hydroxyurea; and (2) explore the relationship of their perceptions to clinical characteristics, HRQOL domains and hydroxyurea adherence.

          Methods

          Thirty-four SCD patients on hydroxyurea (≥6 months) participated in a single-institution study. Study measures included Brief-Illness Perceptions Questionnaire, ©Modified Morisky Adherence Scale 8-items, and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®). We assessed the relationship of patients’ perceptions to hydroxyurea adherence using Wilcoxon rank-sum test, the number of hospitalizations using Kruskal-Wallis test, and the number of ED visits, adherence level, HRQOL domain scores using Spearman’s rho correlations. We conducted a sub-analysis in HbSS patients to evaluate the relationship of patients’ perceptions to laboratory markers of hydroxyurea adherence.

          Results

          Participants were 59% male and 91% Black, and had a median age of 13.5 (range 12–18) years. Participants with ≥4 hospitalizations over 1-year prior (using electronic medical chart review) reported more negative perceptions of SCD-related symptoms and emotional response, and perceived hydroxyurea as less beneficial; all p-values ≤0.01. Most participants (74%) reported low hydroxyurea adherence. Participants with higher hydroxyurea adherence perceived more hydroxyurea benefits ( r s = 0.44, p < 0.01) and had better emotional response to SCD ( r s = −0.44, p = 0.01). In a sub-analysis of HbSS patients, perceived benefits of hydroxyurea positively correlated with HbF ( r s = 0.37, p = 0.05) and MCV values ( r s = 0.35, p = 0.05). Participants with more negative perceptions of SCD-related consequences, concerns, and emotional response, and fewer perceived hydroxyurea benefits reported worse fatigue ( r s = 0.68; r s = 0.44; r s = 0.74; r s = −0.60), pain ( r s = 0.56; r s = 0.54; r s = 0.63; r s = −0.39), anxiety ( r s = 0.55; r s = 0.58; r s = 0.56; r s = −0.47), and depression ( r s = 0.64; r s = 0.49; r s = 0.70; r s = −0.62), respectively, all p-values <0.05.

          Conclusions

          Dynamics influencing hydroxyurea adherence are multifactorial, and understanding patients’ perceptions is critical to overcoming adherence barriers. Patients’ favorable perceptions correlated with greater adherence and better HRQOL domain scores. Prospective evaluation of patients’ perceptions of SCD and hydroxyurea in relation adherence, HRQOL domains and clinical outcomes is warranted.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The future of outcomes measurement: item banking, tailored short-forms, and computerized adaptive assessment.

          The use of item banks and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) begins with clear definitions of important outcomes, and references those definitions to specific questions gathered into large and well-studied pools, or "banks" of items. Items can be selected from the bank to form customized short scales, or can be administered in a sequence and length determined by a computer programmed for precision and clinical relevance. Although far from perfect, such item banks can form a common definition and understanding of human symptoms and functional problems such as fatigue, pain, depression, mobility, social function, sensory function, and many other health concepts that we can only measure by asking people directly. The support of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), as witnessed by its cooperative agreement with measurement experts through the NIH Roadmap Initiative known as PROMIS (www.nihpromis.org), is a big step in that direction. Our approach to item banking and CAT is practical; as focused on application as it is on science or theory. From a practical perspective, we frequently must decide whether to re-write and retest an item, add more items to fill gaps (often at the ceiling of the measure), re-test a bank after some modifications, or split up a bank into units that are more unidimensional, yet less clinically relevant or complete. These decisions are not easy, and yet they are rarely unforgiving. We encourage people to build practical tools that are capable of producing multiple short form measures and CAT administrations from common banks, and to further our understanding of these banks with various clinical populations and ages, so that with time the scores that emerge from these many activities begin to have not only a common metric and range, but a shared meaning and understanding across users. In this paper, we provide an overview of item banking and CAT, discuss our approach to item banking and its byproducts, describe testing options, discuss an example of CAT for fatigue, and discuss models for long term sustainability of an entity such as PROMIS. Some barriers to success include limitations in the methods themselves, controversies and disagreements across approaches, and end-user reluctance to move away from the familiar.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            New medication adherence scale versus pharmacy fill rates in seniors with hypertension.

            To evaluate the association and concordance of the new 8-item self-report Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS) with pharmacy fill data in a sample of community-dwelling seniors with hypertension. Cross-sectional study. Pharmacy records for antihypertensive medications were abstracted for 87 managed care adult patients with hypertension 65 years and older who completed a survey that included the MMAS. Continuous single-interval medication availability (CSA), medication possession ratio (MPR), and continuous multiple-interval medication gaps (CMG) were calculated using pharmacy data. The MMAS adherence was categorized as high, medium, and low (MMAS scores of 8, 6 to <8, and <6, respectively); pharmacy fill nonpersistence was defined as less than 0.8 for CSA and MPR and as greater than 0.2 for CMG. Overall, 58%, 33%, and 9% of participants had high, medium, and low medication adherence, respectively, by the MMAS. After adjustment for demographics and in comparison to high adherers on the MMAS, patients with low MMAS adherence were 6.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.48-19.10) times more likely to have nonpersistent pharmacy fill adherence by CSA and were 5.22 (95% CI, 1.88-14.50) times more likely to have nonpersistent pharmacy fill adherence by MPR. Concordance between the MMAS and CSA, MPR, and CMG was 75% or higher. The MMAS is significantly associated with antihypertensive drug pharmacy refill adherence. Although further validation of the MMAS is needed, it may be useful in identifying low medication adherers in clinical settings.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Illness and Treatment Perceptions Are Associated With Adherence to Medications, Diet, and Exercise in Diabetic Patients

              OBJECTIVE To investigate diabetic patients’ perceptions of illness and treatments, and explore relationships to adherence and blood glucose control. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Forty-nine type 1 and one hundred and eight type 2 diabetic patients completed questionnaires assessing illness perceptions, treatment beliefs, and adherence to medications, diet, and exercise. Blood glucose control was assessed from blood tests. RESULTS Patients rated medication more important than diet and exercise, and reported higher adherence to medications. Insulin was perceived as more helpful for diabetes, while antihypertensives and cholesterol medication were perceived more helpful for preventing heart problems. Perceptions were associated with adherence to insulin, cholesterol and antihypertensive medications, exercise, and diet. Blood glucose control in type 1 diabetic patients was associated with insulin adherence and perceived personal control, and in type 2 diabetic patients to being prescribed insulin or antihypertensives, and perceived personal control. CONCLUSIONS Patients hold specific mental models about diabetes treatments, which are associated with adherence.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                sbadawy@luriechildrens.org
                a-thompson@northwestern.edu
                js-lai@northwestern.edu
                frank.penedo@northwestern.edu
                KRychlik@luriechildrens.org
                rliem@luriechildrens.org
                Journal
                Health Qual Life Outcomes
                Health Qual Life Outcomes
                Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
                BioMed Central (London )
                1477-7525
                5 July 2017
                5 July 2017
                2017
                : 15
                : 136
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2299 3507, GRID grid.16753.36, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplant, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital, , Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, ; 225 E. Chicago Ave., Box #30, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2299 3507, GRID grid.16753.36, Department of Medical Social Sciences, , Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, ; 633 N. St Clair, Suite 19-000, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0388 2248, GRID grid.413808.6, Stanley Manne Children’s Research Institute, , Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital, ; 225 E Chicago Ave., Chicago, IL 60611 USA
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2158 2757, GRID grid.31451.32, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology and Oncology, , Zagazig University Faculty of Medicine, ; Zagazig, Egypt
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4739-265X
                Article
                713
                10.1186/s12955-017-0713-x
                5498866
                28679417
                c7d333e7-17ee-4d9e-95ab-b597cecf43ab
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 25 January 2017
                : 27 June 2017
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Health & Social care
                sickle cell disease,hydroxyurea,adherence,health-related quality of life,patient reported outcomes,perceptions,beliefs

                Comments

                Comment on this article