4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Electrocardiographic differentiation between acute pulmonary embolism and acute coronary syndromes on the basis of negative T waves.

      The American Journal of Cardiology
      Aged, Electrocardiography, Female, Heart Conduction System, physiopathology, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, diagnosis, Predictive Value of Tests, Pulmonary Embolism, Sensitivity and Specificity

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Negative T waves in precordial leads are often seen in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but also occur in those with acute pulmonary embolism (APE). However, little attention has been given to differences in negative T waves between patients with these 2 diseases. The present study examines the value of electrocardiograms for discriminating between 40 patients with APE and 87 patients with ACS who had negative T waves in the precordial leads (V(1) to V(4)) on the admission electrocardiogram. In 77 patients (89%) with ACS, the culprit lesion was confirmed angiographically to be located in the left anterior descending coronary artery. Pulmonary P waves, S(1)S(2)S(3) pattern, S(1)Q(3)T(3) pattern, low voltage, and clockwise rotation were specific for APE, but sensitivities of these findings were very low. In patients with APE, negative T waves were commonly present in leads II, III, aVF, V(1), and V(2), but were less frequent in leads I, aVL, and V(3) to V(6) (p <0.05). Negative T waves in leads III and V(1) were observed in only 1% of patients with ACS compared with 88% of patients with APE (p <0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of this finding for the diagnosis of APE were 88%, 99%, 97%, and 95%, respectively. In conclusion, the presence of negative T waves in both leads III and V(1) allows APE to be differentiated simply but accurately from ACS in patients with negative T waves in the precordial leads.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article