95
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Averaging, not internal noise, limits the development of coherent motion processing

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          • Motion processing abilities develop gradually through childhood.

          • This lengthy development could be due to local noise and/or poor averaging.

          • 5–11-year-olds and adults performed equivalent noise and motion coherence tasks.

          • Through childhood, internal noise reduces and averaging increases.

          • Yet, only improved averaging explains developments in motion coherence sensitivity.

          Abstract

          The development of motion processing is a critical part of visual development, allowing children to interact with moving objects and navigate within a dynamic environment. However, global motion processing, which requires pooling motion information across space, develops late, reaching adult-like levels only by mid-to-late childhood. The reasons underlying this protracted development are not yet fully understood. In this study, we sought to determine whether the development of motion coherence sensitivity is limited by internal noise (i.e., imprecision in estimating the directions of individual elements) and/or global pooling across local estimates. To this end, we presented equivalent noise direction discrimination tasks and motion coherence tasks at both slow (1.5°/s) and fast (6°/s) speeds to children aged 5, 7, 9 and 11 years, and adults. We show that, as children get older, their levels of internal noise reduce, and they are able to average across more local motion estimates. Regression analyses indicated, however, that age-related improvements in coherent motion perception are driven solely by improvements in averaging and not by reductions in internal noise. Our results suggest that the development of coherent motion sensitivity is primarily limited by developmental changes within brain regions involved in integrating motion signals (e.g., MT/V5).

          Related collections

          Most cited references72

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Noise in the nervous system.

          Noise--random disturbances of signals--poses a fundamental problem for information processing and affects all aspects of nervous-system function. However, the nature, amount and impact of noise in the nervous system have only recently been addressed in a quantitative manner. Experimental and computational methods have shown that multiple noise sources contribute to cellular and behavioural trial-to-trial variability. We review the sources of noise in the nervous system, from the molecular to the behavioural level, and show how noise contributes to trial-to-trial variability. We highlight how noise affects neuronal networks and the principles the nervous system applies to counter detrimental effects of noise, and briefly discuss noise's potential benefits.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance.

            We compared the ability of psychophysical observers and single cortical neurons to discriminate weak motion signals in a stochastic visual display. All data were obtained from rhesus monkeys trained to perform a direction discrimination task near psychophysical threshold. The conditions for such a comparison were ideal in that both psychophysical and physiological data were obtained in the same animals, on the same sets of trials, and using the same visual display. In addition, the psychophysical task was tailored in each experiment to the physiological properties of the neuron under study; the visual display was matched to each neuron's preference for size, speed, and direction of motion. Under these conditions, the sensitivity of most MT neurons was very similar to the psychophysical sensitivity of the animal observers. In fact, the responses of single neurons typically provided a satisfactory account of both absolute psychophysical threshold and the shape of the psychometric function relating performance to the strength of the motion signal. Thus, psychophysical decisions in our task are likely to be based upon a relatively small number of neural signals. These signals could be carried by a small number of neurons if the responses of the pooled neurons are statistically independent. Alternatively, the signals may be carried by a much larger pool of neurons if their responses are partially intercorrelated.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Dev Cogn Neurosci
                Dev Cogn Neurosci
                Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
                Elsevier
                1878-9293
                1878-9307
                1 October 2014
                October 2014
                : 10
                : 44-56
                Affiliations
                [a ]Centre for Research in Autism and Education (CRAE), Institute of Education, University of London, 55-59 Gordon Square, Institute of Education, London WC1H 0NU, UK
                [b ]UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, Bath Street, London EC 1V9, UK
                [c ]NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital, 162 City Road, London EC 1V 2PD, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 207 331 5135. c.manning@ 123456ioe.ac.uk
                Article
                S1878-9293(14)00046-2
                10.1016/j.dcn.2014.07.004
                4256063
                25160679
                c7ed6109-68a6-4ffc-92ac-d2c10fce2c80
                © 2014 The Authors
                History
                : 5 February 2014
                : 16 July 2014
                : 18 July 2014
                Categories
                Article

                Neurosciences
                visual development,motion processing,direction discrimination
                Neurosciences
                visual development, motion processing, direction discrimination

                Comments

                Comment on this article