2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Learning Agility of Learning and Development Professionals in the Life Sciences Field During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Empirical Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the life sciences field worldwide. Life sciences organizations (eg, pharmaceutical and med-tech companies) faced a rapidly increasing need for vital medical products, patient support, and vaccine development. Learning and development (L&D) departments play a crucial role in life sciences organizations as they apply learning initiatives to organizational strategy within a constantly evolving sector. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the work of L&D professionals in life sciences organizations changed profoundly during the abrupt shift to remote work, since learning and training normally occur in a face-to-face environment. Given the complex and dynamic situation of the pandemic, both individuals and organizations needed to learn quickly and apply what they learned to solve new, unprecedented problems. This situation presents an opportunity to study how characteristics of learning agility were evidenced by life sciences organizations and individual employees in the remote working mode.

          Objective

          In collaboration with Life Sciences Trainers & Educators Networks (LTEN), this study investigated the responses and learning agility of L&D professionals and their organizational leadership within the life sciences sector to the work changes due to the pandemic. The study answered the following questions: (1) How did L&D professionals in the life sciences sector respond to the changes in their work environment during the COVID-19 pandemic? (2) How did L&D professionals in the life sciences sector demonstrate learning agility during remote working?

          Methods

          We adopted a mixed methods approach that included a semistructured interview and a survey. Participants who were life sciences or health care L&D practitioners and in relevant positions were recruited via email through the LTEN and its partner pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical devices organizations. Interviews with 12 L&D professionals were conducted between June and August 2020 through phone or online conferencing, covering 22 open-ended questions to stimulate ideas that could be explored further in the survey. The semistructured interview questions were grounded in theory on learning agility. In total, 4 themes were developed from the interviews, which formed the basis for developing the survey items. The subsequent survey regarding 4 specific themes was conducted from August to October 2020 using Qualtrics. Both interview and survey data were analyzed based on a learning agility framework.

          Results

          Findings revealed generally positive organizational and individual responses toward the changes brought about by the pandemic. Results also indicated that a disruptive crisis, such as the shift from working in the office to working from home (WFH), required professionals’ learning agility to both self-initiate their own learning and to support the learning agility of others in the organization.

          Conclusions

          This study was designed to better understand education and training in the life sciences field, particularly during the unique circumstances of the global COVID-19 pandemic. We put forward several directions for future research on the learning agility of L&D professionals in life sciences organizations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Book: not found

          Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research

          Combining the latest thinking in the field with practical, step-by-step guidance, the Third Edition of John W. Creswell and Vicki L. Plano Clark’s Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research now covers seven mixed methods designs with accompanying journal articles illustrating each design. The authors walk readers through the entire research process, and present updated examples from published mixed methods studies drawn from multiple disciplines. In addition, this new edition includes information about the dynamic and evolving nature of the field of mixed methods research, four additional methodological approaches, and coverage of new directions in mixed methods.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Path Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Introduction

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Interact J Med Res
                Interact J Med Res
                IJMR
                Interactive Journal of Medical Research
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                1929-073X
                Jan-Jun 2022
                26 April 2022
                26 April 2022
                : 11
                : 1
                : e33360
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Learning and Performance Systems Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA United States
                [2 ] Vanguard Group, Inc Valley Forge, PA United States
                [3 ] Siemens Healthineers Newark, DE United States
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: XinYun Peng xypeng@ 123456psu.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2448-4508
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3195-4205
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4264-1135
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8754-1664
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0981-7020
                Article
                v11i1e33360
                10.2196/33360
                9045484
                35417403
                c831cf61-c124-493c-b9f8-f9affced2671
                ©XinYun Peng, Nicole Wang-Trexler, William Magagna, Susan Land, Kyle Peck. Originally published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research (https://www.i-jmr.org/), 26.04.2022.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.i-jmr.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 9 September 2021
                : 7 November 2021
                : 29 November 2021
                : 18 March 2022
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                covid-19,learning agility,learning and development professionals,life sciences professionals,training and development,mixed methods

                Comments

                Comment on this article