[Consensus for the identification of geriatric patients in the emergency care setting in Germany].

Abstract

For the treatment of geriatric inpatients, the efficacy of a multimodal geriatric intervention based on findings of a comprehensive geriatric assessment has well been established. Therefore, the focus of elderly inpatient care switched to the identification of geriatric patients who have unintended or unscheduled contact to an accident and emergency department. In Germany, a uniform standard on how to correctly identify geriatric patients in such settings has yet to be established.Three medical societies, the Federal Association of Geriatrics ("Bundesverband Geriatrie", BVG), the German Society for Gerontology and Geriatrics ("Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gerontologie und Geriatrie", DGGG) and the German Geriatrics Society ("Deutsche Gesellschaft für Geriatrie", DGG) have reached a consensus on tools and instruments for the identification of geriatric patients in the emergency care setting. Basis of the consensus were the existing scientific evidence and further considerations, especially the applicability of international findings in Germany and feasibility.Three recommendations are made: (1) The use of prognostic indices is not recommended, as prognostic indices appear to be inappropriate to disclose the complex needs of geriatric patients. (2) Comprehensive geriatric assessment is established and effective, but too complex for use in the emergency setting. It is recommended for cases in which information from screening instruments or other sources does not allow a clear decision. (3) Among screening instruments, the Identification of Seniors At Risk (ISAR) screening tool seems to be well established and suitable for screening purposes in Germany. A German adaption is recommended as well as the implementation in settings where no other tools or geriatric expertise are available.