6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Friend vs. Foe: Cognitive and Affective Empathy in Women With Different Hormonal States

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Empathy is crucial for social functioning as well as social coherence. It can be influenced by modulatory factors such as familiarity and liking (i.e., emotional closeness). Furthermore, there are first hints that hormonal status may modulate affective but not cognitive empathy in women. The aim of this study was to investigate potential separate as well as combined modulatory effects of emotional closeness and hormonal status on female cognitive and affective empathy. Three hormonal status groups of women ( n = 62) were studied: (1) naturally-cycling (NC) women in the early follicular phase (fNC), (2) NC women during periovulatory phase (oNC), and (3) oral contraceptive (OC) users. All women underwent a newly developed empathy task (i.e., Tübinger Empathy Test, TET) presenting textual descriptions of positive and negative emotional scenes relating to three different perspectives (i.e., self vs. friend vs. enemy/disliked person). Regardless of hormonal status, empathic responses were higher for the friend compared to the enemy perspective for both empathy components. However, cognitive empathy was less affected by varying emotional closeness toward the target person than affective empathy. Hormonal status modulated only affective empathy. OC users showed significantly less affective empathy toward the enemy compared to the fNC women. Overall, affective empathy seems more sensitive to modulatory effects of emotional closeness and hormonal status than cognitive empathy. Possible implications of this current investigation for future research on empathy and OC use, contraceptive education as well as for other clinical applications are discussed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.

          In recent studies of the structure of affect, positive and negative affect have consistently emerged as two dominant and relatively independent dimensions. A number of mood scales have been created to measure these factors; however, many existing measures are inadequate, showing low reliability or poor convergent or discriminant validity. To fill the need for reliable and valid Positive Affect and Negative Affect scales that are also brief and easy to administer, we developed two 10-item mood scales that comprise the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). The scales are shown to be highly internally consistent, largely uncorrelated, and stable at appropriate levels over a 2-month time period. Normative data and factorial and external evidence of convergent and discriminant validity for the scales are also presented.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The functional architecture of human empathy.

            Empathy accounts for the naturally occurring subjective experience of similarity between the feelings expressed by self and others without loosing sight of whose feelings belong to whom. Empathy involves not only the affective experience of the other person's actual or inferred emotional state but also some minimal recognition and understanding of another's emotional state. In light of multiple levels of analysis ranging from developmental psychology, social psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and clinical neuropsychology, this article proposes a model of empathy that involves parallel and distributed processing in a number of dissociable computational mechanisms. Shared neural representations, self-awareness, mental flexibility, and emotion regulation constitute the basic macrocomponents of empathy, which are underpinned by specific neural systems. This functional model may be used to make specific predictions about the various empathy deficits that can be encountered in different forms of social and neurological disorders.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The neuroscience of empathy: progress, pitfalls and promise.

              The last decade has witnessed enormous growth in the neuroscience of empathy. Here, we survey research in this domain with an eye toward evaluating its strengths and weaknesses. First, we take stock of the notable progress made by early research in characterizing the neural systems supporting two empathic sub-processes: sharing others' internal states and explicitly considering those states. Second, we describe methodological and conceptual pitfalls into which this work has sometimes fallen, which can limit its validity. These include the use of relatively artificial stimuli that differ qualitatively from the social cues people typically encounter and a lack of focus on the relationship between brain activity and social behavior. Finally, we describe current research trends that are overcoming these pitfalls through simple but important adjustments in focus, and the future promise of empathy research if these trends continue and expand.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Neurosci
                Front Neurosci
                Front. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-4548
                1662-453X
                08 March 2021
                2021
                : 15
                : 608768
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen , Tübingen, Germany
                [2] 2International Max Planck Research School for Cognitive and Systems Neuroscience, University of Tübingen , Tübingen, Germany
                [3] 3Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of Uppsala , Uppsala, Sweden
                [4] 4LEAD Graduate School and Research Network, University of Tübingen , Tübingen, Germany
                [5] 5Tübingen Neuro Campus, University of Tübingen , Tübingen, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Hubert Vaudry, Université de Rouen, France

                Reviewed by: Jean Decety, University of Chicago, United States; Deborah Suchecki, Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil

                *Correspondence: Ann-Christin Sophie Kimmig, ann-christin.kimmig@ 123456med.uni-tuebingen.de

                This article was submitted to Neuroendocrine Science, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience

                Article
                10.3389/fnins.2021.608768
                7982725
                c8cb8137-b95a-4111-876e-ffa0e3249b31
                Copyright © 2021 Kimmig, Wildgruber, Wendel, Sundström-Poromaa and Derntl.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 21 September 2020
                : 09 February 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 57, Pages: 12, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 10.13039/501100001659
                Funded by: Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes 10.13039/501100004350
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Original Research

                Neurosciences
                empathy,cognitive empathy,affective empathy,emotional closeness,hormonal status,oral contraceptives

                Comments

                Comment on this article