7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Limits of Conscious Deception Detection: When Reliance on False Deception Cues Contributes to Inaccurate Judgments

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          People are generally too trusting, which decreases their ability to detect deceit. This suggests that distrust could enhance our deception detection abilities. Yet, a state of distrust may induce deliberative conscious thought. This mode of thinking has been related to worse complex decision making. Hence, we investigate whether contextual distrust decreases the ability to detect deceit via the stronger reliance on consciously held beliefs about which cues betray deception. In two studies, participants were asked to judge videos of either deceiving or truth telling targets. Contextual distrust was manipulated by asking participants to squint their eyes (distrust) or to round their eyes (trust) while watching the videos. Participants’ judgments of targets being deceptive or truthful were measured (Studies 1 and 2) and they were asked on what basis they made these judgments (Study 2). Results showed that distrust especially hampers the detection of truth, which is partly due to more reliance on false beliefs about deception cues. These results corroborate the idea that deliberative conscious information processing may hinder truth detection, while intuitive information processing may facilitate it.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Lying in everyday life.

          In 2 diary studies of lying, 77 college students reported telling 2 lies a day, and 70 community members told 1. Participants told more self-centered lies than other-oriented lies, except in dyads involving only women, in which other-oriented lies were as common as self-centered ones. Participants told relatively more self-centered lies to men and relatively more other-oriented lies to women. Consistent with the view of lying as an everyday social interaction process, participants said that they did not regard their lies as serious and did not plan them much or worry about being caught. Still, social interactions in which lies were told were less pleasant and less intimate than those in which no lies were told.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A Theory of Unconscious Thought.

              We present a theory about human thought named the unconscious-thought theory (UTT). The theory is applicable to decision making, impression formation, attitude formation and change, problem solving, and creativity. It distinguishes between two modes of thought: unconscious and conscious. Unconscious thought and conscious thought have different characteristics, and these different characteristics make each mode preferable under different circumstances. For instance, contrary to popular belief, decisions about simple issues can be better tackled by conscious thought, whereas decisions about complex matters can be better approached with unconscious thought. The relations between the theory and decision strategies, and between the theory and intuition, are discussed. We end by discussing caveats and future directions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                19 June 2020
                2020
                : 11
                : 1331
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Psychology of Conflict, Risk & Safety, University of Twente , Enschede, Netherlands
                [2] 2Department of Social, Economic, and Organisational Psychology, Leiden University , Leiden, Netherlands
                [3] 3Department of Social and Cultural Psychology, Radboud University Nijmegen , Nijmegen, Netherlands
                Author notes

                Edited by: Marc-Andre Reinhard, University of Kassel, Germany

                Reviewed by: Timothy R. Levine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States; Miguel A. Vadillo, Autonomous University of Madrid, Spain

                *Correspondence: Mariëlle Stel, m.stel@ 123456utwente.nl

                This article was submitted to Consciousness Research, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01331
                7318848
                c9451bf7-8ffd-4903-bdf8-ee60bcad0112
                Copyright © 2020 Stel, Schwarz, van Dijk and van Knippenberg.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 16 July 2019
                : 19 May 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 83, Pages: 12, Words: 0
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                deception,trust,non-verbal cues,conscious thought,lie,truth,information processing,intuition

                Comments

                Comment on this article