35
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Postmarket Safety Events Among Novel Therapeutics Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Between 2001 and 2010

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          Are characteristics of novel therapeutics known at the time of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval associated with postmarket safety events, including withdrawal, boxed warnings, and safety communications?

          Findings

          Among 222 novel therapeutics approved by the FDA from 2001 through 2010, 71 (32.0%) were affected by a postmarket safety event. Postmarket safety events were more frequent among biologics, therapeutics indicated for the treatment of psychiatric disease, those receiving accelerated approval, and those with near–regulatory deadline approval.

          Meaning

          Postmarket safety events are common after FDA approval, highlighting the importance of continuous monitoring of the safety of novel therapeutics throughout their life cycle.

          Abstract

          This study describes withdrawals, boxed warnings, and safety communications affecting pharmaceuticals and biologics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration between 2001 and 2010, and associations between characteristics known at the time of approval and those events.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Postmarket safety events of novel pharmaceuticals and biologics occur when new safety risks are identified after initial regulatory approval of these therapeutics. These safety events can change how novel therapeutics are used in clinical practice and inform patient and clinician decision making.

          Objectives

          To characterize the frequency of postmarket safety events among novel therapeutics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and to examine whether any novel therapeutic characteristics known at the time of FDA approval were associated with increased risk.

          Design and Setting

          Cohort study of all novel therapeutics approved by the FDA between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2010, followed up through February 28, 2017.

          Exposures

          Novel therapeutic characteristics known at the time of FDA approval, including drug class, therapeutic area, priority review, accelerated approval, orphan status, near–regulatory deadline approval, and regulatory review time.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          A composite of (1) withdrawals due to safety concerns, (2) FDA issuance of incremental boxed warnings added in the postmarket period, and (3) FDA issuance of safety communications.

          Results

          From 2001 through 2010, the FDA approved 222 novel therapeutics (183 pharmaceuticals and 39 biologics). There were 123 new postmarket safety events (3 withdrawals, 61 boxed warnings, and 59 safety communications) during a median follow-up period of 11.7 years (interquartile range [IQR], 8.7-13.8 years), affecting 71 (32.0%) of the novel therapeutics. The median time from approval to first postmarket safety event was 4.2 years (IQR, 2.5-6.0 years), and the proportion of novel therapeutics affected by a postmarket safety event at 10 years was 30.8% (95% CI, 25.1%-37.5%). In multivariable analysis, postmarket safety events were statistically significantly more frequent among biologics (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.93; 95% CI, 1.06-3.52; P = .03), therapeutics indicated for the treatment of psychiatric disease (IRR = 3.78; 95% CI, 1.77-8.06; P < .001), those receiving accelerated approval (IRR = 2.20; 95% CI, 1.15-4.21; P = .02), and those with near–regulatory deadline approval (IRR = 1.90; 95% CI, 1.19-3.05; P = .008); events were statistically significantly less frequent among those with regulatory review times less than 200 days (IRR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24-0.87; P = .02).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          Among 222 novel therapeutics approved by the FDA from 2001 through 2010, 32% were affected by a postmarket safety event. Biologics, psychiatric therapeutics, and accelerated and near–regulatory deadline approval were statistically significantly associated with higher rates of events, highlighting the need for continuous monitoring of the safety of novel therapeutics throughout their life cycle.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          JAMA
          JAMA
          JAMA
          JAMA
          American Medical Association
          0098-7484
          1538-3598
          9 May 2017
          9 May 2017
          9 November 2017
          : 317
          : 18
          : 1854-1863
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
          [2 ]Division of Health Care Policy and Research and Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
          [3 ]Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
          [4 ]State University of New York Downstate College of Medicine, Brooklyn
          [5 ]Gastroenterology and Nutrition Department, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France
          [6 ]Proctology Department, Croix-Saint-Simon Hospital, Paris, France
          [7 ]Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
          [8 ]The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
          [9 ]Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
          [10 ]Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale–New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
          Author notes
          Article Information
          Corresponding Author: Joseph S. Ross, MD, MHS, Section of General Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, PO Box 208093, New Haven, CT 06520 ( joseph.ross@ 123456yale.edu ).
          Accepted for Publication: April 6, 2017.
          Author Contributions: Drs Downing and Ross had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
          Concept and design: Downing, Ross.
          Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
          Drafting of the manuscript: Downing.
          Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
          Statistical analysis: Downing, Shah.
          Obtained funding: Krumholz.
          Supervision: Aminawung, Zeitoun, Ross.
          Conflict of Interest Disclosures: All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Dr Zeitoun reported receiving personal fees from Cepton, Oliver Wyman, Roland Berger, McCann Health, Omnicom, Grey Healthcare, Saatchi & Saatchi, Sudler, TBWA, Havas, Agipharm, Mayoly Spindler, Teva, Menarini, Pierre Fabre, Merck, and AbbVie. Dr Krumholz reported receiving a grant from the US Food and Drug Administration and Medtronic; having a research agreement with Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) through Yale University; serving as chair of a cardiac scientific advisory board for UnitedHealth; being a founder of Hugo; being a participant and participant representative of the IBM Watson Health Life Sciences Board; and serving as an advisory board member for Element Science. Dr Ross reported receiving grants from the US Food and Drug Administration, Medtronic, Johnson & Johnson, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, and the Laura and John Arnold Foundation. No other disclosures were reported.
          Article
          PMC5815036 PMC5815036 5815036 joi170043
          10.1001/jama.2017.5150
          5815036
          28492899
          c9459249-2333-4bbf-8597-6d9f0f9aab5c
          Copyright 2017 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
          History
          : 6 December 2016
          : 30 March 2017
          : 6 April 2017
          Categories
          Research
          Research
          Original Investigation

          Comments

          Comment on this article