+1 Recommend
1 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Application of eDNA method in the detection of Cordulegaster (Insecta: Odonata) species

      , , , ,

      ARPHA Conference Abstracts

      Pensoft Publishers

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the potential of eDNA techniques to detect the presence of the two dragonfly species Cordulegaster heros and Cordulegaster bidentata. Both species are classified as “near threatened” according to the IUCN Red List and are strictly protected in several countries. Monitoring these species with traditional sampling methods is often difficult, time-consuming and invasive. In this pilot study, we first collected tissue samples from C. heros and C. bidentata to sequence the traditional DNA-barcode gene fragment COI. We then collected further dragonfly COI sequences from BOLD to design species-specific primers. This, however, was impossible given the enormous variability of COI. Therefore, we refrained from species-specific eDNA assays and followed eDNA metabarcoding protocol using universal (BF2/BF2) and a newly designed dragonfly specific primer. For the evaluation of the method, we took water samples from places where Cordulegaster specimens are known to occur. After the extraction, we used two sequential PCR steps for obtaining the desired amplicon (two-step PCR) using universal primers in the first step, and group (dragonfly) specific primers or universal primers. Amplicons were sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq platform and then analysed the data with the JAMP pipeline. With the newly designed primers and we could effectively detect the targeted dragonfly species from tissue samples, and also from filtered environmental samples. The detection of the species with the traditional method is time consuming and involves the destruction of the specimens. In comparison, with the eDNA method we could easily detect these near threatherned odonates and other dragonfly species in a non-invasive way.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          ARPHA Conference Abstracts
          Pensoft Publishers
          March 04 2021
          March 04 2021
          : 4
          © 2021


          Comment on this article