16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Individual, interpersonal, and organisational factors of healthcare conflict: A scoping review.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Unresolved conflicts among healthcare professionals can lead to difficult patient care consequences. This scoping review examines the current healthcare literature that reported sources and consequences of conflict associated with individual, interpersonal, and organisational factors. We identified 99 articles published between 2001 and 2015 from PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Excerpta Medical Database. Most reviewed studies relied on healthcare professionals' perceptions and beliefs associated with conflict sources and consequences, with few studies reporting behavioural or organisational change outcomes. Individual conflict sources included personal traits, such as self-focus, self-esteem, or worldview, as well as individuals' conflict management styles. These conflicts posed threats to one's physical, mental, and emotional health and to one's ability to perform at work. Interpersonal dynamics were hampered by colleagues' uncivil behaviours, such as low degree of support, to more destructive behaviours including bullying or humiliation. Perceptions of disrespectful working environment and weakened team collaboration were the main interpersonal conflict consequences. Organisational conflict sources included ambiguity in professional roles, scope of practice, reporting structure, or workflows, negatively affecting healthcare professionals' job satisfactions and intent to stay. Future inquiries into healthcare conflict research may target the following: shifting from research involving single professions to multiple professions; dissemination of studies via journals that promote interprofessional research; inquiries into the roles of unconscious or implicit bias, or psychological capital (i.e., resilience) in healthcare conflict; and diversification of data sources to include hospital or clinic data with implications for conflict sources.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Interprof Care
          Journal of interprofessional care
          Informa UK Limited
          1469-9567
          1356-1820
          May 2017
          : 31
          : 3
          Affiliations
          [1 ] a Department of Surgery , University of Washington , Seattle , Washington , USA.
          [2 ] b Unit of Development and Research in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine , University of Geneva , Geneva , Switzerland.
          [3 ] c Department of Radiology , University of Washington , Seattle , Washington , USA.
          [4 ] d University of Washington , Seattle , Washington , USA.
          [5 ] e Compensation & Pension , Loma Linda VA Healthcare System , Loma Linda , California , USA.
          [6 ] f Wound and Ostomy , University of Washington Medical Center , Seattle , Washington , USA.
          [7 ] g Department of Urology , University of Washington , Seattle , Washington , USA.
          [8 ] h Foster School of Business , University of Washington , Seattle , Washington , USA.
          [9 ] i Department of Medical Humanities , Korea University College of Medicine , Seoul , South Korea.
          Article
          10.1080/13561820.2016.1272558
          28276847
          c9678b69-1a56-4765-8bc0-b863ca1f98cc
          History

          Collaboration,communication,conflict,interprofessional relations,scoping review

          Comments

          Comment on this article