64
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      “What Women Like”: Influence of Motion and Form on Esthetic Body Perception

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Several studies have shown the distinct contribution of motion and form to the esthetic evaluation of female bodies. Here, we investigated how variations of implied motion and body size interact in the esthetic evaluation of female and male bodies in a sample of young healthy women. Participants provided attractiveness, beauty, and liking ratings for the shape and posture of virtual renderings of human bodies with variable body size and implied motion. The esthetic judgments for both shape and posture of human models were influenced by body size and implied motion, with a preference for thinner and more dynamic stimuli. Implied motion, however, attenuated the impact of extreme body size on the esthetic evaluation of body postures, while body size variations did not affect the preference for more dynamic stimuli. Results show that body form and action cues interact in esthetic perception, but the final esthetic appreciation of human bodies is predicted by a mixture of perceptual and affective evaluative components.

          Related collections

          Most cited references62

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body.

          Despite extensive evidence for regions of human visual cortex that respond selectively to faces, few studies have considered the cortical representation of the appearance of the rest of the human body. We present a series of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies revealing substantial evidence for a distinct cortical region in humans that responds selectively to images of the human body, as compared with a wide range of control stimuli. This region was found in the lateral occipitotemporal cortex in all subjects tested and apparently reflects a specialized neural system for the visual perception of the human body.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience.

            The implications of the discovery of mirroring mechanisms and embodied simulation for empathetic responses to images in general, and to works of visual art in particular, have not yet been assessed. Here, we address this issue and we challenge the primacy of cognition in responses to art. We propose that a crucial element of esthetic response consists of the activation of embodied mechanisms encompassing the simulation of actions, emotions and corporeal sensation, and that these mechanisms are universal. This basic level of reaction to images is essential to understanding the effectiveness both of everyday images and of works of art. Historical, cultural and other contextual factors do not preclude the importance of considering the neural processes that arise in the empathetic understanding of visual artworks.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Selectivity for the human body in the fusiform gyrus.

              Functional neuroimaging studies have revealed human brain regions, notably in the fusiform gyrus, that respond selectively to images of faces as opposed to other kinds of objects. Here we use fMRI to show that the mid-fusiform gyrus responds with nearly the same level of selectivity to images of human bodies without faces, relative to tools and scenes. In a group-average analysis (n = 22), the fusiform activations identified by contrasting faces versus tools and bodies versus tools are very similar. Analyses of within-subjects regions of interest, however, show that the peaks of the two activations occupy close but distinct locations. In a second experiment, we find that the body-selective fusiform region, but not the face-selective region, responds more to stick figure depictions of bodies than to scrambled controls. This result further distinguishes the two foci and confirms that the body-selective response generalizes to abstract image formats. These results challenge accounts of the mid-fusiform gyrus that focus solely on faces and suggest that this region contains multiple distinct category-selective neural representations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychology
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Research Foundation
                1664-1078
                09 July 2012
                2012
                : 3
                : 235
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Dipartimento di Scienze Umane, Università di Udine Udine, Italy
                [2] 2Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico “E. Medea,” San Vito al Tagliamento Pordenone, Italy
                Author notes

                Edited by: Marco Tamietto, Tilburg University, Netherlands

                Reviewed by: Lynden Miles, University of Aberdeen, UK; Beatriz Calvo-Merino, City University London, UK

                *Correspondence: Valentina Cazzato and Cosimo Urgesi, Department of Human Sciences, University of Udine, Via Margreth, 3, I-33100 Udine, Italy. e-mail: valentina.cazzato@ 123456uniud.it ; cosimo.urgesi@ 123456uniud.it

                This article was submitted to Frontiers in Emotion Science, a specialty of Frontiers in Psychology.

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00235
                3408112
                22866044
                c991c6fb-709f-4b5d-be62-afdd2c7220d7
                Copyright © 2012 Cazzato, Siega and Urgesi.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.

                History
                : 09 March 2012
                : 20 June 2012
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 72, Pages: 10, Words: 9205
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                body perception,body posture,body shape,esthetic judgments,implied motion

                Comments

                Comment on this article