Blog
About

1,679
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

      Lancet

      Diagnosis, standards, Statistics as Topic, Humans, Peak Expiratory Flow Rate

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In clinical measurement comparison of a new measurement technique with an established one is often needed to see whether they agree sufficiently for the new to replace the old. Such investigations are often analysed inappropriately, notably by using correlation coefficients. The use of correlation is misleading. An alternative approach, based on graphical techniques and simple calculations, is described, together with the relation between this analysis and the assessment of repeatability.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          2868172

          Chemistry

          Diagnosis, standards, Statistics as Topic, Humans, Peak Expiratory Flow Rate

          Comments

          Comment on this article