9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A comparison of cost-sharing versus free care in children: effects on the demand for office-based medical care.

      Medical Care
      Child, Child Health Services, economics, utilization, Cost Sharing, Deductibles and Coinsurance, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Office Visits, Pathology, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, statistics & numerical data, Regression Analysis, United States

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Using data from the community based RAND Health Insurance Experiment, the effect of cost-sharing versus free care on the use of office-based medical care in children was examined. Children from families on cost-sharing plans had a 22 percent lower probability (P less than 0.005) of having an episode of care during the study year. Both the number of episodes of care and total charges for outpatient professional services were 30 percent lower (P less than 0.005) with cost-sharing. cost-sharing reduced average charges for medical services by 30 percent (P less than 0.01) and pathology charges by 45 percent (P less than 0.005). cost-sharing reduced medical services received by 26 percent (P less than 0.05) and pathology services received by 43 percent (P less than 0.05) but did not have a significant effect on either the price for medical services or pathology services. It was concluded that there is a large difference between cost-sharing insurance plans and free care in the demand for office-based medical care in children. Cost-sharing results in children receiving fewer services, not lower priced services.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article