26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      Are you tired of sifting through news that doesn't interest you?
      Personalize your Karger newsletter today and get only the news that matters to you!

      Sign up

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      New Developments in Corticosteroid Therapy for Uveitis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Corticosteroids remain the mainstay of the management of patients with uveitis. Topical corticosteroids are effective in the control of anterior uveitis, but vary in strength, ocular penetration and side effect profile. Systemic corticosteroids are widely used for the management of posterior segment inflammation which requires treatment, particularly when it is associated with systemic disease or when bilateral ocular disease is present. However, when ocular inflammation is unilateral, or is active in one eye only, local therapy has considerable advantages, and periocular injections of corticosteroid are a useful alternative to systemic medication and are very effective in controlling mild or moderate intraocular inflammation. More recently, the injection of intraocular corticosteroids such as triamcinolone have been found to be effective in reducing macular oedema and improving vision in uveitic eyes which have proved refractory to systemic or periocular corticosteroids. The effect is usually transient, lasting around 3 months, but can be repeated although the side effects of cataract and raised intraocular pressure are increased in frequency with intraocular versus periocular corticosteroid injections. This has led to the development of new intraocular corticosteroid devices which are designed to deliver sustained-release drugs and obviate the need for systemic immunosuppressive treatment. The first such implant was Retisert, which is surgically implanted (in the operating theatre) and is designed to release fluocinolone over a period of about 30 months. More recently, Ozurdex, a ‘bioerodible’ dexamethasone implant which can be inserted in an office setting, has completed phase III clinical trials in patients with intermediate and posterior uveitis. This implant lasts approximately 6 months, and has been found to be effective with a much better side effect profile than Retisert or intravitreal triamcinolone injection, at least for one injection.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of systemically administered glucocorticoids.

          Glucocorticoids have pleiotropic effects that are used to treat diverse diseases such as asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus and acute kidney transplant rejection. The most commonly used systemic glucocorticoids are hydrocortisone, prednisolone, methylprednisolone and dexamethasone. These glucocorticoids have good oral bioavailability and are eliminated mainly by hepatic metabolism and renal excretion of the metabolites. Plasma concentrations follow a biexponential pattern. Two-compartment models are used after intravenous administration, but one-compartment models are sufficient after oral administration.The effects of glucocorticoids are mediated by genomic and possibly nongenomic mechanisms. Genomic mechanisms include activation of the cytosolic glucocorticoid receptor that leads to activation or repression of protein synthesis, including cytokines, chemokines, inflammatory enzymes and adhesion molecules. Thus, inflammation and immune response mechanisms may be modified. Nongenomic mechanisms might play an additional role in glucocorticoid pulse therapy. Clinical efficacy depends on glucocorticoid pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Pharmacokinetic parameters such as the elimination half-life, and pharmacodynamic parameters such as the concentration producing the half-maximal effect, determine the duration and intensity of glucocorticoid effects. The special contribution of either of these can be distinguished with pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis. We performed simulations with a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model using T helper cell counts and endogenous cortisol as biomarkers for the effects of methylprednisolone. These simulations suggest that the clinical efficacy of low-dose glucocorticoid regimens might be increased with twice-daily glucocorticoid administration.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Randomized controlled study of an intravitreous dexamethasone drug delivery system in patients with persistent macular edema.

            To evaluate a dexamethasone intravitreous drug delivery system (DDS) in patients with persistent (> or =90 days despite treatment) macular edema. This 6-month study randomized 315 patients with persistent macular edema with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/40 to 20/200 in the study eye to observation or a single treatment with dexamethasone DDS, 350 or 700 microg. Proportion of patients achieving a BCVA improvement of 10 or more letters or 15 or more letters, safety measures, change in fluorescein angiographic leakage, and central retinal thickness. At day 90 (primary end point), an improvement in BCVA of 10 letters or more was achieved by a greater proportion of patients treated with dexamethasone DDS, 700 microg (35%) or 350 microg (24%), than observed patients (13%; P<.001 vs 700-microg group; P = .04 vs 350-microg group); an improvement in BCVA of 15 letters or more was achieved in 18% of patients treated with dexamethasone DDS, 700 microg, vs 6% of observed patients (P = .006). Results were similar in patients with diabetic retinopathy, vein occlusion, or uveitis or Irvine-Gass syndrome. During 3 months of observation, 11% of treated patients and 2% of observed patients had intraocular pressure increases of 10 mm Hg or higher. In persistent macular edema, a single dexamethasone DDS treatment produced statistically significant BCVA improvements 90 days after treatment and was well tolerated for 180 days. Application to Clinical Practice Dexamethasone DDS, 700 microg, may have potential as a treatment for persistent macular edema.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Fluocinolone acetonide implant (Retisert) for noninfectious posterior uveitis: thirty-four-week results of a multicenter randomized clinical study.

              To report the interim 34-week safety and efficacy results of a 3-year study to evaluate an investigational intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide (FA) implant in patients with noninfectious posterior uveitis. Prospective, dose-masked, dose-randomized, historically controlled, multicenter trial in patients with unilateral or bilateral disease. A total of 278 patients with recurrent noninfectious posterior uveitis were randomized to receive a 0.59-mg (n = 110) or 2.1-mg (n = 168) implant. In patients with bilateral disease, the more severely affected eye received the implant. The implant was inserted surgically into the vitreous cavity through a pars plana incision. Follow-up visits were scheduled on day 2, week 1, and then every 4 to 6 weeks through 34 weeks after implantation. Systemic, periocular, and topical therapies were reduced as allowed by the clinical response. The primary efficacy outcome was a comparison of the recurrence rate in the implanted eye from the 34 weeks before implantation to the 34 weeks after implantation. Visual acuity (VA), need for adjunctive therapy, and safety also were assessed. Combining both doses, the FA implant reduced the rate of recurrences from 51.4% in the 34 weeks preceding implantation to 6.1% postimplantation (P or =2 grades in 19.8% of phakic implanted eyes, and 9.9% required cataract surgery. There were no statistically significant differences in any of the parameters studied for the 0.59-mg implant, compared with the 2.1-mg implant. The FA implant significantly reduced uveitis recurrences, improved VA, and decreased the need for adjunctive therapy in the studied patient population. The most common side effects included increased intraocular pressure and cataract progression.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                OPH
                Ophthalmologica
                10.1159/issn.0030-3755
                Ophthalmologica
                S. Karger AG
                978-3-8055-9466-0
                978-3-8055-9467-7
                0030-3755
                1423-0267
                2010
                August 2010
                18 August 2010
                : 224
                : Suppl 1
                : 46-53
                Affiliations
                aUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, and bMoorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK; cUniversiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
                Author notes
                *Prof. Sue Lightman, PhD, FRCP, FRCOphth, FMedSci, UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, Moorfields Eye Hospital, 162 City Road, London EC1V 2PD (UK), Tel. +44 207 566 2266, Fax +44 207 251 9350, E-Mail s.lightman@ucl.ac.uk
                Article
                318021 Ophthalmologica 2010;224(suppl 1):46–53
                10.1159/000318021
                20714181
                c9a9fd39-13a6-4d2b-9d0c-180dda3f7bf9
                © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 1, References: 70, Pages: 8
                Categories
                Paper

                Vision sciences,Ophthalmology & Optometry,Pathology
                Corticosteroids,Ozurdex,Triamcinolone,Retisert,Uveitis,Rimexolone

                Comments

                Comment on this article