3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Engineering Chemistry Innovation

      1
      ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
      American Chemical Society (ACS)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Automation of chemistry at a pharmaceutical company commonly entails bringing commercial solutions in-house, reproducing manual processes with a robot, or integrating multiple instruments to eliminate human intervention. A strategy of industrializing proven approaches, while financially justifiable, however, does not encourage innovation. On the other hand, trying to automate unproven or difficult processes may seem to be risky but can actually accelerate the adoption, modification, or rejection of novel technologies. Having chemists and engineers work together to develop automation that accelerates the development and evaluation of innovative concepts is one blueprint for delivering a competitive advantage to an organization.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
          ACS Med. Chem. Lett.
          American Chemical Society (ACS)
          1948-5875
          1948-5875
          April 04 2019
          May 09 2019
          April 25 2019
          May 09 2019
          : 10
          : 5
          : 703-707
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Integrated Science and Technology (iSAT) Discovery, Specialized Research in Chaotic Systems (SPaRCS), AbbVie, 1 North Waukegan Road, North Chicago, Illinois 60064-6212, United States
          Article
          10.1021/acsmedchemlett.9b00096
          6511955
          31097986
          c9b59b94-8fd8-412a-bbac-0d201a386e7c
          © 2019
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article