25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Breaking Bad: How Viruses Subvert the Cell Cycle

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Interactions between the host and viruses during the course of their co-evolution have not only shaped cellular function and the immune system, but also the counter measures employed by viruses. Relatively small genomes and high replication rates allow viruses to accumulate mutations and continuously present the host with new challenges. It is therefore, no surprise that they either escape detection or modulate host physiology, often by redirecting normal cellular pathways to their own advantage. Viruses utilize a diverse array of strategies and molecular targets to subvert host cellular processes, while evading detection. These include cell-cycle regulation, major histocompatibility complex-restricted antigen presentation, intracellular protein transport, apoptosis, cytokine-mediated signaling, and humoral immune responses. Moreover, viruses routinely manipulate the host cell cycle to create a favorable environment for replication, largely by deregulating cell cycle checkpoints. This review focuses on our current understanding of the molecular aspects of cell cycle regulation that are often targeted by viruses. Further study of their interactions should provide fundamental insights into cell cycle regulation and improve our ability to exploit these viruses.

          Related collections

          Most cited references269

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The canonical Notch signaling pathway: unfolding the activation mechanism.

          Notch signaling regulates many aspects of metazoan development and tissue renewal. Accordingly, the misregulation or loss of Notch signaling underlies a wide range of human disorders, from developmental syndromes to adult-onset diseases and cancer. Notch signaling is remarkably robust in most tissues even though each Notch molecule is irreversibly activated by proteolysis and signals only once without amplification by secondary messenger cascades. In this Review, we highlight recent studies in Notch signaling that reveal new molecular details about the regulation of ligand-mediated receptor activation, receptor proteolysis, and target selection.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cdk1 is sufficient to drive the mammalian cell cycle.

            Unicellular organisms such as yeasts require a single cyclin-dependent kinase, Cdk1, to drive cell division. In contrast, mammalian cells are thought to require the sequential activation of at least four different cyclin-dependent kinases, Cdk2, Cdk3, Cdk4 and Cdk6, to drive cells through interphase, as well as Cdk1 to proceed through mitosis. This model has been challenged by recent genetic evidence that mice survive in the absence of individual interphase Cdks. Moreover, most mouse cell types proliferate in the absence of two or even three interphase Cdks. Similar results have been obtained on ablation of some of the activating subunits of Cdks, such as the D-type and E-type cyclins. Here we show that mouse embryos lacking all interphase Cdks (Cdk2, Cdk3, Cdk4 and Cdk6) undergo organogenesis and develop to midgestation. In these embryos, Cdk1 binds to all cyclins, resulting in the phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein pRb and the expression of genes that are regulated by E2F transcription factors. Mouse embryonic fibroblasts derived from these embryos proliferate in vitro, albeit with an extended cell cycle due to inefficient inactivation of Rb proteins. However, they become immortal on continuous passage. We also report that embryos fail to develop to the morula and blastocyst stages in the absence of Cdk1. These results indicate that Cdk1 is the only essential cell cycle Cdk. Moreover, they show that in the absence of interphase Cdks, Cdk1 can execute all the events that are required to drive cell division.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of p53 alleviates inhibition by MDM2.

              DNA-damaging agents signal to p53 through as yet unidentified posttranscriptional mechanisms. Here we show that phosphorylation of human p53 at serine 15 occurs after DNA damage and that this leads to reduced interaction of p53 with its negative regulator, the oncoprotein MDM2, in vivo and in vitro. Furthermore, using purified DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), we demonstrate that phosphorylation of p53 at serines 15 and 37 impairs the ability of MDM2 to inhibit p53-dependent transactivation. We present evidence that these effects are most likely due to a conformational change induced upon phosphorylation of p53. Our studies provide a plausible mechanism by which the induction of p53 can be modulated by DNA-PK (or other protein kinases with similar specificity) in response to DNA damage.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Cell Infect Microbiol
                Front Cell Infect Microbiol
                Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.
                Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2235-2988
                19 November 2018
                2018
                : 8
                : 396
                Affiliations
                [1] 1HKU-Pasteur Research Pole, LKS Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong , Hong Kong, Hong Kong
                [2] 2MRC Protein Phosphorylation and Ubiquitylation Unit, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee , Dundee, United Kingdom
                [3] 3LKS Faculty of Medicine, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Hong Kong , Hong Kong, Hong Kong
                [4] 4Department of Cell Biology and Infection, Institut Pasteur , Paris, France
                Author notes

                Edited by: Jianming Qiu, University of Kansas Medical Center, United States

                Reviewed by: Hung Jen Liu, National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan; Tian Wang, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, United States; Zhengwen Liu, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, China

                *Correspondence: Sumana Sanyal sanyal@ 123456hku.hk
                Roberto Bruzzone bruzzone@ 123456hku.hk

                This article was submitted to Virus and Host, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology

                Article
                10.3389/fcimb.2018.00396
                6252338
                30510918
                c9eb2b77-5340-48d6-bed8-98016809225c
                Copyright © 2018 Fan, Sanyal and Bruzzone.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 11 June 2018
                : 22 October 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 6, Equations: 0, References: 322, Pages: 28, Words: 23018
                Categories
                Cellular and Infection Microbiology
                Review

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                viruses,cell cycle,checkpoint,infection,life cycle,host-pathogen interactions,phosphorylation,degradation

                Comments

                Comment on this article