ScienceOpen:
research and publishing network
For Publishers
Discovery
Metadata
Peer review
Hosting
Publishing
For Researchers
Join
Publish
Review
Collect
My ScienceOpen
Sign in
Register
Dashboard
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Sign in
Register
Dashboard
Search
Search
Advanced search
For Publishers
Discovery
Metadata
Peer review
Hosting
Publishing
For Researchers
Join
Publish
Review
Collect
Blog
About
29
views
0
references
Top references
cited by
315
Cite as...
0 reviews
Review
0
comments
Comment
0
recommends
+1
Recommend
0
collections
Add to
0
shares
Share
Twitter
Sina Weibo
Facebook
Email
3,322
similar
All similar
Record
: found
Abstract
: not found
Article
: not found
Top–down and bottom–up control of visual selection
Author(s):
Jan Theeuwes
Publication date
Created:
October 2010
Publication date
(Print):
October 2010
Journal:
Acta Psychologica
Publisher:
Elsevier BV
Read this article at
ScienceOpen
Publisher
PubMed
Further versions
open (via crossref license)
Powered by
Review
Review article
Invite someone to review
Bookmark
Cite as...
There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
The present paper argues for the notion that when attention is spread across the visual field in the first sweep of information through the brain visual selection is completely stimulus-driven. Only later in time, through recurrent feedback processing, volitional control based on expectancy and goal set will bias visual selection in a top-down manner. Here we review behavioral evidence as well as evidence from ERP, fMRI, TMS and single cell recording consistent with stimulus-driven selection. Alternative viewpoints that assume a large role for top-down processing are discussed. It is argued that in most cases evidence supporting top-down control on visual selection in fact demonstrates top-down control on processes occurring later in time, following initial selection. We conclude that top-down knowledge regarding non-spatial features of the objects cannot alter the initial selection priority. Only by adjusting the size of the attentional window, the initial sweep of information through the brain may be altered in a top-down way. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Related collections
Vision Science collection
Author and article information
Journal
Title:
Acta Psychologica
Abbreviated Title:
Acta Psychologica
Publisher:
Elsevier BV
ISSN (Print):
00016918
Publication date Created:
October 2010
Publication date (Print):
October 2010
Volume
: 135
Issue
: 2
Pages
: 77-99
Article
DOI:
10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.006
PubMed ID:
20507828
SO-VID:
c9f9d314-d465-459d-bbd6-b228472edfd8
Copyright ©
© 2010
License:
https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/
History
Data availability:
Comments
Comment on this article
Sign in to comment
scite_
Similar content
3,322
Visual Performance of Tecnis ZM900 Diffractive Multifocal IOL after 2500 Implants: A 3-Year Followup
Authors:
Leonardo Akaishi
,
Rodrigo Vaz
,
Graziela Vilella
…
SUPERFAMILY—sophisticated comparative genomics, data mining, visualization and phylogeny
Authors:
Derek Wilson
,
Ralph Pethica
,
Yiduo Zhou
…
OPTIMIZATION OF VISUAL COMFORT IN OFFICE SPACE BASED ON STOCHASTIC SHADE ADJUSTMENT
Authors:
Zhang Yijie
,
Yao Jian
See all similar
Cited by
308
Exogenous (automatic) attention to emotional stimuli: a review
Authors:
Luis Carretié
Learned Value Magnifies Salience-Based Attentional Capture
Authors:
Brian Anderson
,
Patryk A Laurent
,
Steven Yantis
Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention
Authors:
Michel F Failing
,
Jan Theeuwes
See all cited by
Version 1
- Current
Version 1