Blog
About

77
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR4 controls the thermosensory activation of flowering

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Plant growth and development are strongly affected by small differences in temperature 1 . Current climate change has already altered global plant phenology and distribution 2, 3 , and projected increases in temperature pose a significant challenge to agriculture 4 . Despite the important role of temperature on plant development, the underlying pathways are unknown. It has previously been shown that thermal acceleration of flowering is dependent on the florigen, FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) 5, 6 . How this occurs is however not understood, since the major pathway known to upregulate FT, the photoperiod pathway, is not required for thermal acceleration of flowering 6 . Here we demonstrate a direct mechanism by which increasing temperature causes the bHLH transcription factor PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR4 (PIF4) to activate FT. Our findings provide a new understanding of how plants control their timing of reproduction in response to temperature. Flowering time is an important trait in crops as well as affecting the lifecycles of pollinator species. A molecular understanding of how temperature affects flowering will be important for mitigating the effects of climate change. Arabidopsis thaliana, like many higher plants, responds to warmer ambient temperatures by increasing its growth rate and accelerating the floral transition 1, 5, 7 . Arabidopsis is a facultative long day plant, and plants grown under short photoperiods are dramatically delayed in flowering. Interestingly, late flowering in short days can be overcome by growth at higher temperatures 6 . The underlying mechanism is however unknown. The flowering response to temperature is dependent on the floral pathway integrator gene FT 6 indicative of a thermosensory pathway that upregulates FT expression independently of daylength. Since the bHLH transcription factor PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR4 (PIF4) has been shown to regulate architectural responses to high temperature 8, 9 , we tested if PIF4 is required for the induction of flowering at high temperature in short photoperiods. While pif4-101 is slightly delayed in flowering at 22 °C, pif4-101 mutants show a striking loss of thermal induction of flowering at 27 °C (Fig. 1a and b). To test if pif4-101 perturbed floral induction by affecting FT expression, we examined the thermal induction of FT in Col-0 and pif4-101. While FT expression is strongly thermally inducible in Col-0, this response is largely abolished in pif4-101 at 27 °C (Fig. 1c), indicating that PIF4 is necessary for the thermal acceleration of flowering in short days. By contrast, PIF4 is not required for the thermosensory induction of flowering under continuous light 8 , suggesting that the photoperiod pathway also interacts with the ambient temperature sensing pathway. The reduced role of PIF4 under continuous light likely reflects the instability of PIF4 in light 10 coupled with the fact that the output of the photoperiod pathway, CONSTANS (CO) protein, is stabilised by light 11 , shifting the balance of floral induction from PIF4 to the photoperiod pathway. Since PIF4 is necessary for the thermal induction of flowering in short days, we tested if it is sufficient to trigger flowering when overexpressed. 35S::PIF4 causes extremely early flowering (Fig. 1d and 1e), similarly to the effect of overexpressing a related gene, PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR5 12 , suggesting that PIF4 is limiting for the acceleration of flowering at lower temperature in short photoperiods. Consistently, 35S::PIF4 plants show elevated levels of FT (Fig. 1f). Furthermore, 35S::PIF4 ft-3 shows a complete suppression of the early flowering phenotype, showing that the induction of flowering by 35S::PIF4 is dependent on FT (Fig. 1g and h). This activation of FT appears to be independent of the established photoperiod pathway since CO does not change in response to 35S::PIF4 (Fig. 1f). Finally, while co-9 mutants are late flowering 6, 13 , we find 35S::PIF4 co-9 plants are early flowering, indicating that PIF4 acts largely independently of CO (supplementary information Fig. S1), consistent with the thermal induction of flowering being independent of the photoperiod pathway (Fig. 1f) 6 . Although PIF4 has been shown to be important for high temperature responses, long-term increases in either PIF4 transcript or PIF4 protein levels in response to higher ambient temperature that can account for the observed growth responses have not been detected 8, 9 . To examine if variation of PIF4 transcription under our experimental conditions might account for the increases in PIF4 activity with temperature, we measured PIF4 transcript levels at 12, 17, 22 and 27 °C in seedlings (Fig. 2a). PIF4 transcript levels increase from 12 °C to 22 °C, while the difference between 22 °C and 27 °C is not statistically significant. Plants at 27 °C, compared to 22 °C, show a very large PIF4-dependent response, suggesting that variation in the PIF4 transcript is not sufficient to account for the acceleration of flowering at 27 °C compared to 22 °C. To test whether temperature-mediated changes in PIF4 transcription are rate-limiting for the biological response, we analysed the behaviour of plants constitutively expressing PIF4. While 35S::PIF4 plants at 22 °C are extremely early flowering, this phenotype can be largely suppressed at 12 °C (Fig. 2b and Fig. S2), indicating that even when PIF4 transcript is abundant, lower temperatures are inhibitory for PIF4 activity. A possible explanation for this difference is that PIF4 protein is destabilised by low temperature. Indeed, PIF4 protein levels have already been shown to be strongly regulated by light 10 , and growth in red and blue photocycles destabilises PIF4 protein at low temperatures 14 . To test this, we examined the levels of PIF4:HA protein at 12 °C, 17 °C, 22 °C and 27 °C under the same light conditions used for our flowering time assays. Consistent with previous studies 10 we see a strong accumulation of PIF4 at the end of the night period, which is subsequently degraded during the day. Despite the suppression of early flowering in 35S::PIF4 at 12 °C compared to 22 ° (Fig. 2b), we do not observe an appreciable difference in PIF4 protein levels at these two temperatures that is likely to account for these different phenotypes (Fig. 2c, Fig. S3). Slightly higher levels of PIF4:HA appear to be present at 27 °C (Fig. 2c), suggesting high temperature stabilisation of PIF4 may also contribute to higher PIF4 activity at 27 °C. Taken together, these data indicate that PIF4 regulates FT in a temperature dependent manner. To determine if this is likely to be the case in planta, we analysed the spatial expression of FT and PIF4. FT has a distinctive pattern of expression in the vasculature of the leaf 15, 16 , and significantly PIF4 is expressed in the same domain (Fig. 3a). Since the regulation of FT by PIF4 could be either direct or indirect, we used chromatin immunopurification (ChIP) to analyse if PIF4 binds directly to the FT promoter proximal to the transcriptional start site (TSS). This region of the promoter was chosen since it has been shown to be both phylogenetically conserved and the site for light mediated regulation of FT expression 16, 17 . We observe robust enrichment of PIF4 near to the TSS (Fig. 3b), indicating that PIF4 binds this region in vivo to activate FT expression. Given the striking effect of ambient temperature on PIF4 activity, which occurs even when PIF4 is constitutively expressed, we hypothesised that the ability of PIF4 to bind the FT promoter may be temperature dependent. To test this, we performed ChIP experiments using 35S::PIF4 plants grown at 12 °C and 27 °C with primers flanking an E-box in the FT promoter (Fig. 3c). Strikingly, we observe a very strong temperature dependence for this binding, with an approximately 5-fold increase in binding at 27 °C compared to 12 °C (Fig. 3d). This indicates that the later flowering of 35S::PIF4 at 12 °C is caused by a decrease in PIF4 binding to FT. Since the 35S promoter causes strong ectopic expression of PIF4, we sought to confirm that PIF4 protein expressed at endogenous levels displays similar temperature dependent binding to the FT promoter. We therefore performed ChIP experiments on a pif4-101 line complemented with PIF4pro::PIF4:ProteinA (Fig. S4). Consistent with the overexpression studies, we observe a strong increase in PIF4 binding to FT as a function of temperature. Reduced binding is observed at 17 °C, consistent with the very late flowering of plants under short days at low temperature, but this binding increases at 22 °C and is even higher at 27 °C (Fig. 3e). The temperature dependent binding of PIF4 to FT could be due to growth temperature influencing the affinity of the PIF4 transcription factor for its binding site or the efficiency of the ChIP could be affected by the temperature that tissues were grown at. To test these possibilities, we analysed another recently described PIF4 target locus 18 , CYP79B2 (At4g39950), which is up-regulated in 35S::PIF4 (Fig. S5a). We find PIF4 binding to occur constitutively at both 12 and 27 °C at a region in the first exon (Fig. S5b). Another region further upstream in the promoter shows a temperature dependent binding of PIF4, and in both cases, no enrichment is seen for a control locus (Fig. S5b). This indicates that the abundant PIF4 protein we observe at 12 °C is active and able to bind target sites and confirms that the ChIP method per se is not influenced by the temperature at which the sample is grown, consistent with other studies 19 . The ability of PIF4 to bind loci in a more temperature independent-manner might explain why 35S::PIF4 at 12 °C maintains hypocotyl and petiole elongation, while early flowering is strongly suppressed. We do not exclude that temperature may also influence PIF4 activity post-translationally. Temperature signals are mediated through H2A.Z-nucleosomes in Arabidopsis 20 , suggesting that temperature may be increasing the accessibility of the PIF4 binding site at the FT promoter. Consistent with this hypothesis, we find that H2A.Z-nucleosomes are present at the PIF4 binding site in the FT promoter. Furthermore, we find that the levels of H2A.Z-nucleosomes at the FT promoter decrease with higher temperature (Fig. 3f). These results suggest that the presence of H2A.Z nucleosomes is limiting for PIF4 binding to FT, and that the PIF4 binding we observe at higher temperature is due to the greater accessibility of chromatin containing H2A.Z-nucleosomes at higher temperature. This suggests that in the absence of H2A.Z-nucleosomes, PIF4 should bind FT more strongly. We therefore compared the ability of PIF4 expressed under its own promoter to bind to the FT promoter in wild-type compared to arp6-1, a background lacking incorporation of H2A.Z-nucleosomes. Interestingly, we observe considerably greater binding of PIF4 in arp6-1 (Fig. 3g), indicating that H2A.Z-nucleosomes are rate-limiting for PIF4 to activate FT expression. The eviction of H2A.Z-nucleosomes by higher temperature therefore provides a direct mechanism for the temperature regulated expression of FT (Fig. 4c). Consistent with our previous results and the established role of H2A.Z in regulating temperature dependent gene expression, we find that there is increased PIF4 mRNA in arp6-1 background (Fig. S6). However, our results for 35S::PIF4 suppression by 12 °C indicate that transcriptional up-regulation of PIF4 is not the rate-limiting step in regulating PIF4 mediated flowering at higher temperatures. Our results indicate that the temperature dependent regulation of FT by PIF4 is controlled at the level of chromatin accessibility of the FT promoter and possibly at the level of PIF4 protein activity. PIF4 activity is controlled through the repressive activity of DELLA proteins that prevent PIF4 binding DNA 21, 22 . Consistently, plants having reduced or absent DELLA function are early flowering 23 . We hypothesised that delay in flowering at lower temperatures might at least in part be due to DELLA mediated repression of PIF4 activity. If so, it would be expected that absence of DELLAs should cause accelerated flowering at lower temperatures. In accord with this expectation, we found that a mutant lacking DELLAs flowers much earlier than wild-type when grown at 12 °C (Fig. 4a and 4b). The phytohormone gibberellin (GA) triggers DELLA protein degradation, and plays a key permissive role for FT induction, since in a GA deficient background, GA application increases FT expression 15-fold 24 . While it was proposed more than 50 years ago that gibberellins are upstream of florigen 25 , the mechanism has not been clear. As DELLA proteins have been shown to be key regulators by which GA influences PIF4, our finding that PIF4 is able to directly activate FT suggests a possible mechanism by which changes in GA levels may influence flowering. Climate change has already caused measurable changes in plant phenology and behaviour 2 , and plants that incorporate temperature information into their lifecycles appear to be able to adapt to warmer conditions more effectively than those plants that primarily rely on photoperiod to synchronise their lifestyles 3 . The importance of the effects of climate change on yield are highlighted by the significant detrimental effects of increasing temperatures on yield 4 . PIF4 is a central integrator of environmental information in the plant and our finding that it activates FT at higher temperatures suggests it will be a key node for breeding crops resilient to climate change. This importance is suggested by the recent discovery that natural variation at PIF4 plays a major role in key ecological traits 26 . ONLINE METHODS 1. Plant material and growth conditions All plant lines used were in Col-0 background unless otherwise specified. pif4-101 mutant was provided by C. Fankhauser, HA tagged 35S::PIF4 by S. Prat 12 All references to “35S::PIF” and “PIF:HA” refer to this line, i.e. 35S::PIF4:HA. FT::GUS was obtained from K.Goto 15 . phyb-9 ft-10 double mutants were generated by crossing respective single mutants. 35S::PIF4:HA co-9 was obtained by crossing. The crosses were genotyped for presence of the 35S::PIF4 construct by PCR on genomic DNA using primers 2362 and 2363, resulting in two products of different size representing the cDNA transgene and the genomic DNA fragment, respectively. ft-10 was genotyped using primers 1580 and 1582 for the insertion, or 1580 and 1581 to detect the wildtype fragment. co-9 was genotyped with primers 3650 and 3652 for insertion, and 3291 and 3292 for the wildtype fragment. For genotyping phyb-9, DNA was amplified using oligos 2137 and 2138 followed by Mnl I digestion to distinguish between wildtype and mutant alleles. The global della mutant is in the Ler background and was described previously 8 . PIF4::PIF4:PROTEINA and PIF4::PIF4:GUS were constructed by amplifying the genomic fragment of PIF4 including the promoter with oligos 1534 and 1535. The PCR product was cloned into pENTR/D-TOPO (Invitrogen) and inserted into the binary plasmids PW889 (C-terminal PROTEIN A) and PW395 (C-terminal GUS), respectively, using Gateway technology (Invitrogen). Transgenic plants were obtained by transforming pif4-101 by floral dip. For hypocotyl measurements seeds were surface sterilized, sown on ½ MS media, stratified for 2 days at 4°C in the dark and germinated for 24 h at 22°C. The plates were then transferred to short day conditions (8/16 h photoperiod) at 22°C and 27°C respectively and grown vertically for 10 days before being imaged and hypocotyl length measured using the ImageJ software (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/). Oligonucleotide sequences are provided in Table S1. 2. Transcript analysis Samples from plants grown in long days (16/8 h photoperiod) were harvested and total RNA was extracted using Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen). 2 μg of RNA were treated with DnaseI (Roche) and used for cDNA synthesis (First strand cDNA synthesis kit, Fermentas). cDNA was diluted 1:8 and used for quantitative PCR using a Roche Lightcycler 480 and the corresponding Sybr Green master mix. To detect FT transcript levels, oligos 3180 and 3181 were used, for CO oligos 2951 and 2952. PIF4 transcript levels were analyzed using oligos 3952 and 3953. Oligos 3247 and 3408 amplifying TUB6 (At5g12250) were used for normalization. 3. Immunoblot analysis For analysing the possible effect of temperature on PIF4 protein stability, Plants overexpressing PIF4:HA (35S::PIF4:HA) were used. Seven day old 35S::PIF4:HA seedlings grown in short days at 17 °C were transferred to 12, 17, 22 and 27 °C in short days for 2 days. Samples were collected at end of night (EON) and thereafter 30 min, 1 hour and 4 hours under illumination. Protein samples were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred on to nitrocellulose membrane. PIF4:HA was detected using HRP conjugated anti-HA antibody (Miltenyi Biotech) and visualised by chemiluminscent detection using Immobilon Chemiluminescent HRP substrate (Millipore). 4. GUS histochemical assay For GUS-staining plants were grown on ½ MS plates in long days (16/8 h photoperiods) for 10 days and kept in the dark for 24 h before harvesting. Plants were stained in buffer containing 100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7, 10 mM EDTA, 0.1% Triton-X100, 0.5 mM K-ferrocyanide and 1 mM X-gluc at 37°C for 24 h before destaining in ethanol. 5. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) ChIP was performed as described 20 with minor modifications. 35S::PIF4:HA seedlings were grown on ½ MS plates for 10 days and kept in the dark for 24 h at respective temperatures before harvesting. 1.5 g of plant tissue and 4 μg of antibody (HA-tag antibody ab9110 from Abcam) were used for ChIP. To analyse the dynamics of PIF4::PIF4:PROTEINA, plants were grown in respective temperatures under short day conditions for four weeks. Aerial parts of the plants were collected and cross-linked before being used for chromatin preparations. ChIP was done using magnetic beads (Dynabeads M-270 Epoxy, Invitrogen) coated with rabbit IgG (Sigma, I5006) as described (http://www.ncdir.org/protocols/Rout/Conjugation%20of%20Dynabeads.pdf). To analyse H2A.Z dynamics at the FT locus in response to temperature, we used 3 week old seedlings of HTA11::HTA11:GFP grown at 17 °C and 27 °C. ChIP was done using anti-GFP antibody (Abcam, ab290). To analyze PIF4 binding in Col-0 and arp6-1 backgrounds, respective genotypes with PIF4::PIF4:3XFLAG were grown on soil at 22 °C under short photoperiods for three weeks before samples fixed by formaldehyde cross-linking. ChIP was performed using anti-FLAG M2 affinity gel (Sigma A2220). Immuno-complexes were eluted using 3X FLAG peptide (Sigma F4799) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Immunoprecipitated DNA was eluted after reverse cross-linking by boiling at 95 °C for 1 min in presence of 10 % Chelex (BioRad laboratories) followed by treatment with Proteinase K. Oligonucleotides 3255 and 3256 for FT-15 region, 3613 and 3614 for FT-c1, 3607 and 3608 for FT-c and 3261 and 3262 for FT-f were used for detecting PIF4 binding to the FT locus. As a positive control for PIF4 binding, At5g45280 was analysed using oligos 2857 and 2958. HSP70 was used as a negative control using oligos 1862 and 1865. For analysing PIF4 binding at At4g39950 oligonucleotides 4240 and 4241 was used for region 1; and oligonucleotides 4246 and 4247 were used for region 2. Oligos 1860 and 1861 were used for HSP70 as a negative control. Oligonucleotide sequences are provided in Table S1. Supplementary Material 1

          Related collections

          Most cited references 26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Rapid changes in flowering time in British plants.

          The average first flowering date of 385 British plant species has advanced by 4.5 days during the past decade compared with the previous four decades: 16% of species flowered significantly earlier in the 1990s than previously, with an average advancement of 15 days in a decade. Ten species (3%) flowered significantly later in the 1990s than previously. These data reveal the strongest biological signal yet of climatic change. Flowering is especially sensitive to the temperature in the previous month, and spring-flowering species are most responsive. However, large interspecific differences in this response will affect both the structure of plant communities and gene flow between species as climate warms. Annuals are more likely to flower early than congeneric perennials, and insect-pollinated species more than wind-pollinated ones.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Historical warnings of future food insecurity with unprecedented seasonal heat.

            Higher growing season temperatures can have dramatic impacts on agricultural productivity, farm incomes, and food security. We used observational data and output from 23 global climate models to show a high probability (>90%) that growing season temperatures in the tropics and subtropics by the end of the 21st century will exceed the most extreme seasonal temperatures recorded from 1900 to 2006. In temperate regions, the hottest seasons on record will represent the future norm in many locations. We used historical examples to illustrate the magnitude of damage to food systems caused by extreme seasonal heat and show that these short-run events could become long-term trends without sufficient investments in adaptation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Photoreceptor regulation of CONSTANS protein in photoperiodic flowering.

              Many plants flower in response to seasonal fluctuations in day length. The CONSTANS (CO) gene of Arabidopsis promotes flowering in long days. Flowering is induced when CO messenger RNA expression coincides with the exposure of plants to light. However, how this promotes CO activity is unknown. We show that light stabilizes nuclear CO protein in the evening, whereas in the morning or in darkness the protein is degraded by the proteasome. Photoreceptors regulate CO stability and act antagonistically to generate daily rhythms in CO abundance. This layer of regulation refines the circadian rhythm in CO messenger RNA and is central to the mechanism by which day length controls flowering.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0410462
                6011
                Nature
                Nature
                Nature
                0028-0836
                1476-4687
                10 December 2014
                21 March 2012
                12 April 2012
                03 August 2016
                : 484
                : 7393
                : 242-245
                Affiliations
                []Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK
                [§ ]Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3RB, UK
                Author notes
                []To whom correspondence should be addressed: philip.wigge@ 123456jic.ac.uk

                AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

                SVK, DL, KEJ, EA performed the experiments. NPH and PAW designed the study and supervised the work. All authors discussed the results and made substantial contributions to the manuscript.

                EMS41033
                10.1038/nature10928
                4972390
                22437497

                Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article