27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Sanitation and Hygiene-Specific Risk Factors for Moderate-to-Severe Diarrhea in Young Children in the Global Enteric Multicenter Study, 2007–2011: Case-Control Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Diarrheal disease is the second leading cause of disease in children less than 5 y of age. Poor water, sanitation, and hygiene conditions are the primary routes of exposure and infection. Sanitation and hygiene interventions are estimated to generate a 36% and 48% reduction in diarrheal risk in young children, respectively. Little is known about whether the number of households sharing a sanitation facility affects a child's risk of diarrhea. The objective of this study was to describe sanitation and hygiene access across the Global Enteric Multicenter Study (GEMS) sites in Africa and South Asia and to assess sanitation and hygiene exposures, including shared sanitation access, as risk factors for moderate-to-severe diarrhea (MSD) in children less than 5 y of age.

          Methods/Findings

          The GEMS matched case-control study was conducted between December 1, 2007, and March 3, 2011, at seven sites in Basse, The Gambia; Nyanza Province, Kenya; Bamako, Mali; Manhiça, Mozambique; Mirzapur, Bangladesh; Kolkata, India; and Karachi, Pakistan. Data was collected for 8,592 case children aged <5 y old experiencing MSD and for 12,390 asymptomatic age, gender, and neighborhood-matched controls. An MSD case was defined as a child with a diarrheal illness <7 d duration comprising ≥3 loose stools in 24 h and ≥1 of the following: sunken eyes, skin tenting, dysentery, intravenous (IV) rehydration, or hospitalization. Site-specific conditional logistic regression models were used to explore the association between sanitation and hygiene exposures and MSD. Most households at six sites (>93%) had access to a sanitation facility, while 70% of households in rural Kenya had access to a facility. Practicing open defecation was a risk factor for MSD in children <5 y old in Kenya. Sharing sanitation facilities with 1–2 or ≥3 other households was a statistically significant risk factor for MSD in Kenya, Mali, Mozambique, and Pakistan. Among those with a designated handwashing area near the home, soap or ash were more frequently observed at control households and were significantly protective against MSD in Mozambique and India.

          Conclusions

          This study suggests that sharing a sanitation facility with just one to two other households can increase the risk of MSD in young children, compared to using a private facility. Interventions aimed at increasing access to private household sanitation facilities may reduce the burden of MSD in children. These findings support the current World Health Organization/ United Nations Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) system that categorizes shared sanitation as unimproved.

          Abstract

          In a matched case-control study, Kelly Baker and colleagues explore the association between sanitation and hygiene exposures and moderate-to-severe diarrhea in young children in Africa and South Asia.

          Editors' Summary

          Background

          Diarrhea—passing three or more loose or liquid stools per day—is a leading cause of death among children under 5 y old. Diarrhea, which can cause severe dehydration, kills about three-quarters of a million young children every year, mainly in resource-limited countries. Frequent bouts of diarrhea also cause long-term damage to the gut, malnutrition, and growth stunting. Diarrhea is a common symptom of gastrointestinal infections. The enteric pathogens (viruses, bacteria, and parasites infecting the gut) that cause diarrhea spread through contaminated food or drinking water and through poor hygiene (for example, failure to wash one’s hands after using the toilet) and inadequate sanitation (unsafe disposal of human excreta). Improvements in water, sanitation, and hygiene can reduce exposure to enteric pathogens, thereby reducing the incidence of diarrhea among young children. For example, access to an improved sanitation facility reduces the risk of diarrhea in young children by up to 36%.

          Why Was This Study Done?

          In 2000, world leaders agreed to reduce the proportion of the global population without access to safe drinking water and basic sanitation to half of the 1990 level by 2015 as part of Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 7; the MDGs were designed to eradicate extreme poverty globally. To measure progress towards MDG7, the WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) currently defines an improved sanitation facility as an unshared facility that hygienically separates human excreta from human contact (for example, a flush toilet or a pit latrine). Facilities of an improved type that are shared by multiple households are classified by the JMP as unimproved because of worries that shared facilities are less hygienic and less accessible than private household facilities. However, some experts suggest that the JMP guidelines should be changed to allow facilities shared by five or fewer households to be considered as improved facilities if they meet the other criteria for separating human excreta from human contact. But does sharing a sanitation facility affect a child’s risk of diarrhea? Here, the researchers investigate this question by analyzing data collected by the Global Enteric Multicenter Study (GEMS).

          What Did the Researchers Do and Find?

          GEMS is a case-control study, an observational study that compares the characteristics of people with a specific disease with those of people without that disease. It collected data on 8,592 children under 5 y old with moderate-to-severe diarrhea (MSD; experiencing diarrhea at least three times in 24 h with signs of moderate-to-severe dehydration or hospitalization) and 12,390 healthy children matched for age, gender, and location at seven sites in Africa and South Asia. Most of the households (>93%) at six of the sites had access to a sanitation facility, whereas only 70% of households at the Kenyan site had access to a facility. Compared to having a private household sanitation facility, sharing a facility with three or more households significantly increased the risk of young children developing diarrhea (a significantly increased risk is unlikely to have occurred by chance) at the study sites in Kenya, Mali, Mozambique, and Pakistan. At the sites in Kenya, Mali, and Pakistan, sharing a facility with one or two households also increased MSD risk. Sharing a sanitation facility did not increase MSD risk at the sites in The Gambia, Bangladesh, or India.

          What Do These Findings Mean?

          These findings show that sharing a sanitation facility with one or two other households is associated with an increased risk of MSD in young children. Because this was an observational study, these findings only show an association between the use of shared sanitation facilities and MSD risk; they cannot prove that using shared facilities causes diarrhea. It could be, for example, that households who decide to invest in a private sanitation facility also prioritize safe hygiene practices. The reduced risk of diarrhea in these households might then be the result of everyone washing their hands after using the toilet rather than the result of having a private latrine. Nevertheless, these findings suggest that interventions aimed at increasing access to private household sanitation facilities might reduce the global MSD burden. Moreover, they suggest that shared sanitation facilities should continue to be classified as “unimproved” for the purposes of monitoring global access to sanitation.

          Additional Information

          This list of resources contains links that can be accessed when viewing the PDF on a device or via the online version of the article at http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002010.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Water, sanitation and hygiene for the prevention of diarrhoea

          Background Ever since John Snow’s intervention on the Broad St pump, the effect of water quality, hygiene and sanitation in preventing diarrhoea deaths has always been debated. The evidence identified in previous reviews is of variable quality, and mostly relates to morbidity rather than mortality. Methods We drew on three systematic reviews, two of them for the Cochrane Collaboration, focussed on the effect of handwashing with soap on diarrhoea, of water quality improvement and of excreta disposal, respectively. The estimated effect on diarrhoea mortality was determined by applying the rules adopted for this supplement, where appropriate. Results The striking effect of handwashing with soap is consistent across various study designs and pathogens, though it depends on access to water. The effect of water treatment appears similarly large, but is not found in few blinded studies, suggesting that it may be partly due to the placebo effect. There is very little rigorous evidence for the health benefit of sanitation; four intervention studies were eventually identified, though they were all quasi-randomized, had morbidity as the outcome, and were in Chinese. Conclusion We propose diarrhoea risk reductions of 48, 17 and 36%, associated respectively, with handwashing with soap, improved water quality and excreta disposal as the estimates of effect for the LiST model. Most of the evidence is of poor quality. More trials are needed, but the evidence is nonetheless strong enough to support the provision of water supply, sanitation and hygiene for all.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Multi-country analysis of the effects of diarrhoea on childhood stunting.

            Diarrhoea is an important cause of death and illness among children in developing countries; however, it remains controversial as to whether diarrhoea leads to stunting. We conducted a pooled analysis of nine studies that collected daily diarrhoea morbidity and longitudinal anthropometry to determine the effects of the longitudinal history of diarrhoea prior to 24 months on stunting at age 24 months. Data covered a 20-year period and five countries. We used logistic regression to model the effect of diarrhoea on stunting. The prevalence of stunting at age 24 months varied by study (range 21-90%), as did the longitudinal history of diarrhoea prior to 24 months (incidence range 3.6-13.4 episodes per child-year, prevalence range 2.4-16.3%). The effect of diarrhoea on stunting, however, was similar across studies. The odds of stunting at age 24 months increased multiplicatively with each diarrhoeal episode and with each day of diarrhoea before 24 months (all P or=5 diarrhoeal episodes before 24 months was 25% (95% CI 8-38%) and that attributed to being ill with diarrhoea for >or=2% of the time before 24 months was 18% (95% CI 1-31%). These observations are consistent with the hypothesis that a higher cumulative burden of diarrhoea increases the risk of stunting.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Measuring inequality with asset indicators

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Med
                PLoS Med
                plos
                plosmed
                PLoS Medicine
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1549-1277
                1549-1676
                3 May 2016
                May 2016
                : 13
                : 5
                : e1002010
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Center for Vaccine Development, Departments of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
                [2 ]Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America
                [3 ]Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
                [4 ]Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America
                [5 ]Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
                [6 ]Emergent BioSolutions, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States of America
                [7 ]Centre de Recerca en Salut Internacional de Barcelona, Hospital Clinic (CRESIB), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, and Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Mozambique
                [8 ]World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
                [9 ]US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nairobi, Kenya
                [10 ]Emory Global Health Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
                [11 ]Kenya Medical Research Institute/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KEMRI/CDC), Kisumu, Kenya
                [12 ]International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh
                [13 ]The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
                [14 ]Medical Research Council (United Kingdom), Fajara, The Gambia
                [15 ]Centre pour le Développement des Vaccins, Bamako, Mali
                [16 ]National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India
                [17 ]India Public Health Association and PATH India Office, New Delhi, India
                [18 ]Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, the Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan; Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
                Makerere University Medical School, UGANDA
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: MML KLK JPN KKB CEO EDM. Analyzed the data: KKB CEO TLA EDM. Wrote the first draft of the manuscript: KKB. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: KKB CEO TLA EDM. Agree with the manuscript’s results and conclusions: KKB CEO MML KLK JPN TLA THF DN WCB YW PLA RFB RO ASGF SKD SA DSa SOS DSu AKMZ FQ EDM. Supervised enrollment of patients, implementation of the study protocol, and data acquisition: PLA RFB RO ASGF SKD SA DSa SOS DSu AKMZ FQ. Epidemiology Study Coordinators: THF DN. Provided biostatistical support for the study: TLA WCB YW. All authors have read, and confirm that they meet, ICMJE criteria for authorship.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3774-2628
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4159-0097
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4140-3263
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8174-9643
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2747-5685
                Article
                PMEDICINE-D-15-01934
                10.1371/journal.pmed.1002010
                4854459
                27138888
                ca471890-3faf-4d76-b002-73190cf8c2fd

                This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

                History
                : 30 June 2015
                : 21 March 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 4, Pages: 19
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000865, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation;
                Award ID: 38874
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000200, United States Agency for International Development;
                Award Recipient :
                This work was supported by Grant #38874 from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ( http://www.gatesfoundation.org/) to MML, Principal Investigator. Salary support for CEO was provided by the US Agency for International Development ( https://www.usaid.gov/) through an Inter-Agency Agreement with the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. THF, a current employee of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, contributed as an author to the design and collection of data supporting the preparation of this manuscript while employed by the Center for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland Baltimore.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Environmental Health
                Sanitation
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Public and Occupational Health
                Environmental Health
                Sanitation
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Public and Occupational Health
                Hygiene
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Gastroenterology and Hepatology
                Diarrhea
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Diagnostic Medicine
                Signs and Symptoms
                Diarrhea
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
                Signs and Symptoms
                Diarrhea
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Age Groups
                Children
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Families
                Children
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Physiology
                Physiological Processes
                Defecation
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Physiology
                Physiological Processes
                Defecation
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Musculoskeletal System
                Limbs (Anatomy)
                Arms
                Hands
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Musculoskeletal System
                Limbs (Anatomy)
                Arms
                Hands
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Natural Resources
                Water Resources
                Earth Sciences
                Hydrology
                Surface Water
                Custom metadata
                These resources are being made available in accordance with the Global Access commitment of The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation who funded the GEMS. Data are available from the University of Maryland Baltimore's Center for Vaccine Development for researchers who request access to data at the following website: http://medschool.umaryland.edu/GEMS/data.asp. The GEMS consortium has established a committee to review requests for access in order to collect information to determine how the GEMS data and specimens are being used by the wider scientific community, and to ensure duplication of efforts from other researchers does not occur.

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content118

                Cited by39

                Most referenced authors642