85
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Effects of Twitter Sentiment on Stock Price Returns

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Social media are increasingly reflecting and influencing behavior of other complex systems. In this paper we investigate the relations between a well-known micro-blogging platform Twitter and financial markets. In particular, we consider, in a period of 15 months, the Twitter volume and sentiment about the 30 stock companies that form the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) index. We find a relatively low Pearson correlation and Granger causality between the corresponding time series over the entire time period. However, we find a significant dependence between the Twitter sentiment and abnormal returns during the peaks of Twitter volume. This is valid not only for the expected Twitter volume peaks (e.g., quarterly announcements), but also for peaks corresponding to less obvious events. We formalize the procedure by adapting the well-known “event study” from economics and finance to the analysis of Twitter data. The procedure allows to automatically identify events as Twitter volume peaks, to compute the prevailing sentiment (positive or negative) expressed in tweets at these peaks, and finally to apply the “event study” methodology to relate them to stock returns. We show that sentiment polarity of Twitter peaks implies the direction of cumulative abnormal returns. The amount of cumulative abnormal returns is relatively low (about 1–2%), but the dependence is statistically significant for several days after the events.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Predicting the behavior of techno-social systems.

          We live in an increasingly interconnected world of techno-social systems, in which infrastructures composed of different technological layers are interoperating within the social component that drives their use and development. Examples are provided by the Internet, the World Wide Web, WiFi communication technologies, and transportation and mobility infrastructures. The multiscale nature and complexity of these networks are crucial features in understanding and managing the networks. The accessibility of new data and the advances in the theory and modeling of complex networks are providing an integrated framework that brings us closer to achieving true predictive power of the behavior of techno-social systems.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Economic networks: the new challenges.

            The current economic crisis illustrates a critical need for new and fundamental understanding of the structure and dynamics of economic networks. Economic systems are increasingly built on interdependencies, implemented through trans-national credit and investment networks, trade relations, or supply chains that have proven difficult to predict and control. We need, therefore, an approach that stresses the systemic complexity of economic networks and that can be used to revise and extend established paradigms in economic theory. This will facilitate the design of policies that reduce conflicts between individual interests and global efficiency, as well as reduce the risk of global failure by making economic networks more robust.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ensuring the data-rich future of the social sciences.

              Gary King (2011)
              Massive increases in the availability of informative social science data are making dramatic progress possible in analyzing, understanding, and addressing many major societal problems. Yet the same forces pose severe challenges to the scientific infrastructure supporting data sharing, data management, informatics, statistical methodology, and research ethics and policy, and these are collectively holding back progress. I address these changes and challenges and suggest what can be done.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                2015
                21 September 2015
                : 10
                : 9
                : e0138441
                Affiliations
                [1 ]IMT Institute for Advanced Studies, Piazza San Francesco 19, 55100 Lucca, Italy
                [2 ]Jožef Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
                [3 ]Istituto dei Sistemi Complessi (ISC), Via dei Taurini 19, 00185 Rome, Italy
                [4 ]London Institute for Mathematical Sciences, 35a South St. Mayfair, London W1K 2XF, United Kingdom
                University of Warwick, UNITED KINGDOM
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: GR DA IM. Performed the experiments: GR DA MG. Analyzed the data: GR DA IM GC MG. Wrote the paper: GR DA IM GC MG.

                Article
                PONE-D-15-24174
                10.1371/journal.pone.0138441
                4577113
                26390434
                ca6fadb6-a1fe-48f7-88e2-ea2bd389a813
                Copyright @ 2015

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

                History
                : 3 June 2015
                : 31 August 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 4, Pages: 21
                Funding
                All the authors acknowledge support of the EC projects SIMPOL no. 610704, MULTIPLEX no. 317532, and DOLFINS no. 640772. GC also acknowledges support of the EC projects SoBigData no. 654024, and CoeGSS no. 676547. DA, MG, and IM also acknowledge support of the Slovenian ARRS programme no. P2-103. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                The data used in the study available, including the DJIA30 Twitter sentiment and closing price data, used for the analyses, are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1533283.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article