12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Development and validation of a clinically applicable score to classify cachexia stages in advanced cancer patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome that is highly prevalent in advanced cancer patients and leads to progressive functional impairments. The classification of cachexia stages is essential for diagnosing and treating cachexia. However, there is a lack of simple tools with good discrimination for classifying cachexia stages. Therefore, our study aimed to develop a clinically applicable cachexia staging score (CSS) and validate its discrimination of clinical outcomes for different cachexia stages.

          Methods

          Advanced cancer patients were enrolled in our study. A CSS comprising the following five components was developed: weight loss, a simple questionnaire of sarcopenia (SARC‐F), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, appetite loss, and abnormal biochemistry. According to the CSS, patients were classified into non‐cachexia, pre‐cachexia, cachexia, and refractory cachexia stages, and clinical outcomes were compared among the four groups.

          Results

          Of the 297 participating patients, data from 259 patients were ultimately included. Based on the CSS, patients were classified into non‐cachexia ( n = 69), pre‐cachexia ( n = 68), cachexia ( n = 103), and refractory cachexia ( n = 19) stages. Patients with more severe cachexia stages had lower skeletal muscle indexes ( P = 0.002 and P = 0.004 in male and female patients, respectively), higher prevalence of sarcopenia ( P = 0.017 and P = 0.027 in male and female patients, respectively), more severe symptom burden ( P < 0.001), poorer quality of life ( P < 0.001 for all subscales except social well‐being), and shorter survival times ( P < 0.001).

          Conclusions

          The CSS is a simple and clinically applicable tool with excellent discrimination for classifying cachexia stages. This score is extremely useful for the clinical treatment and prognosis of cachexia and for designing clinical trials.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Use of the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) as a nutrition assessment tool in patients with cancer.

          To evaluate the use of the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) as a nutrition assessment tool in patients with cancer. An observational study assessing the nutritional status of patients with cancer. Oncology ward of a private tertiary Australian hospital. Seventy-one cancer patients aged 18-92 y. Scored PG-SGA questionnaire, comparison of scored PG-SGA with subjective global assessment (SGA), sensitivity, specificity. Some 24% (17) of 71 patients were well nourished, 59% (42) of patients were moderately or suspected of being malnourished and 17% (12) of patients were severely malnourished according to subjective global assessment (SGA). The PG-SGA score had a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 82% at predicting SGA classification. There was a significant difference in the median PG-SGA scores for each of the SGA classifications (P<0.001), with the severely malnourished patients having the highest scores. Re-admission within 30 days of discharge was significantly different between SGA groups (P=0.037). The mortality rate within 30 days of discharge was not significantly different between SGA groups (P=0.305). The median length of stay of well nourished patients (SGA A) was significantly lower than that of the malnourished (SGA B+C) patients (P=0.024). The scored PG-SGA is an easy to use nutrition assessment tool that allows quick identification and prioritisation of malnutrition in hospitalised patients with cancer.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Definition of cancer cachexia: effect of weight loss, reduced food intake, and systemic inflammation on functional status and prognosis.

            Cancer cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome that is poorly defined. Our objective was to evaluate whether a 3-factor profile incorporating weight loss (> or = 10%), low food intake ( or = 10 mg/L) might relate better to the adverse functional aspects of cachexia and to a patient's overall prognosis than will weight loss alone. One hundred seventy weight-losing (> or = 5%) patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were screened for nutritional status, functional status, performance score, health status, and quality of life. Patients were followed for a minimum of 6 mo, and survival was noted. Patients were characterized by using the individual factors, > or = 2 factors, or all 3 factors. Weight loss alone did not define a population that differed in functional aspects of self-reported quality of life or health status and differed only in objective factors of physical function. The 3-factor profile identified both reduced subjective and objective function. In the overall population, the 3 factors, > or = 2 factors, and individual profile factors (except weight loss) all carried adverse prognostic significance (P < 0.01). Subgroup analysis showed that the 3-factor profile carried adverse prognostic significance in localized (hazard ratio: 4.9; P < 0.001) but not in metastatic disease. Weight loss alone does not identify the full effect of cachexia on physical function and is not a prognostic variable. The 3-factor profile (weight loss, reduced food intake, and systemic inflammation) identifies patients with both adverse function and prognosis. Shortened survival applies particularly to cachectic patients with localized disease, thereby reinforcing the need for early intervention.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Validating the SARC-F: a suitable community screening tool for sarcopenia?

              Using data from the Hong Kong Mr and Ms Os study, we validated the SARC-F against 3 consensus definitions of sarcopenia from Europe, Asia, and an international group, and compared the ability of all 4 measures to predict 4-year physical limitation, walking speed, and repeated chair stands.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                syyu_tjh@163.com
                Journal
                J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle
                J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle
                10.1007/13539.2190-6009
                JCSM
                Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2190-5991
                2190-6009
                25 January 2018
                April 2018
                : 9
                : 2 ( doiID: 10.1002/jcsm.v9.2 )
                : 306-314
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Cancer Center of Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan 430030 Hubei Province China
                [ 2 ] Cell and Molecular Biology Laboratory Department of Orthopedics, Alpert Medical School of Brown University/Rhode Island Hospital, Providence RI 02903 USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence to:

                Shiying Yu, Cancer Center of Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan 430030, Hubei Province, China. Email: syyu_tjh@ 123456163.com

                Article
                JCSM12275 JCSM-D-17-00137
                10.1002/jcsm.12275
                5879986
                29372594
                ca74266e-6605-4b9e-ae2c-2502aa055ac0
                © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the Society on Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 31 May 2017
                : 14 October 2017
                : 20 November 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 4, Pages: 9, Words: 3876
                Funding
                Funded by: National Natural Science foundation of China
                Award ID: 81372852
                Award ID: 11602155
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                jcsm12275
                April 2018
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:version=5.3.4 mode:remove_FC converted:02.04.2018

                Orthopedics
                cancer,cachexia,classification,quality of life,survival
                Orthopedics
                cancer, cachexia, classification, quality of life, survival

                Comments

                Comment on this article