5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      1799
      Next Generation Fecal Transplant for Recurrent C. difficile Infection with and without Antiobiotic Pre-Treatment: Lessons Learned from the PUNCH CD Phase 2 Safety Study

      abstract
      , MD 1 , , MD 2 , , DO 3 , , MD, MPH, , RN, MHA 4
      Open Forum Infectious Diseases
      Oxford University Press

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background.  Fecal transplant (FT) is a promising non-antibiotic treatment option for refractory/recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and is gaining increasing acceptance. However, the optimal protocol for FT is yet to be determined. We report on enema administration of RBX2660 (microbiota suspension), a next generation fecal transplant, for the treatment of recurrent CDI, with or without antibiotic pre-treatment in the context of the PUNCH CD phase 2 safety study. Methods.  RBX2660 was administered via enema to patients with recurrent CDI within 24-48 hours after completion of a 7-day course of oral vancomycin to bring their CDI under control. No pre-enema bowel prep was required. A second RBX2660 enema treatment was permitted if CDI recurred in < 8 weeks. Antibiotics for CDI were not prescribed prior to the second treatment, and RBX2660 was administered to patients with active CDI. Enema administration was chosen as it carries less risk than sedated procedures. Results.  Thirty-four patients (mean age 66.8 years; range 26.7 to 89.6 years; 67.6% female) were enrolled in the study. Thirty-one patients received at least one RBX2660 treatment and were included in the 60-day interim analysis. Efficacy of the first enema defined as the absence of CDI at 8 weeks was 52% (16/31). Efficacy increased markedly for the second dose when antibiotics were not present to 78.6% (11/14), representing a 51% improvement. Overall efficacy was 87.1% (27/31). Enema administration was simple and well tolerated. There was no difference in the incidence of adverse events after treatment with RBX2660 with and without antibiotic pretreatment, and there were no serious adverse events related to the treatment in either case. Conclusion.  This first prospective multi-center study of a biologic drug containing a suspension of live intestinal microbes for recurrent CDI demonstrated that enema administration with or without antibiotic pre-treatment is safe. Overall efficacy results were comparable with those reported for fecal transplant in the literature. Disclosures.   P. Mariani, Rebiotix: Investigator, Research support R. Orenstein, ReBiotix: Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Research support; Merck: Consultant and Investigator, Research support M. K. Sobcinski, Rebiotix Inc: Employee, Salary

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Open Forum Infect Dis
          Open Forum Infect Dis
          ofid
          ofids
          Open Forum Infectious Diseases
          Oxford University Press
          2328-8957
          December 2014
          December 2014
          : 1
          : Suppl 1 , IDWeek 2014 Abstracts
          : S62-S63
          Affiliations
          [1 ]University of North Dakota School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Fargo, ND
          [2 ]Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO
          [3 ]Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
          Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO
          [4 ]Rebiotix Inc, Roseville, MN
          Author notes

          Session: 226. Clostridium difficile: Treatment and Prevention

          Saturday, October 11, 2014: 2:00 PM

          Article
          ofu051
          10.1093/ofid/ofu051.171
          5782069
          ca9249e4-2fbe-44cc-ab24-056573d14ddc
          © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
          History
          Categories
          IDWeek 2014 Abstracts
          Oral Abstracts

          Comments

          Comment on this article