3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The contribution of biomass and waste resources to decarbonizing transportation and related energy and environmental effects

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Analyzed the extent to which biomass can contribute to the decarbonization of transportation as electrification of the light-duty fleet increases.

          Abstract

          Various technologies to reduce emissions from the transportation sector have emerged in the past decades, including biofuels and electric vehicles. Electrification is vital to decarbonization, but it is insufficient alone and may not apply to all transportation sectors. There is considerable interest in biofuels to complement electrification in decarbonizing transportation. In this study, we evaluate the extent to which biomass can contribute to the decarbonization of the transportation sector as electrification of the light-duty fleet increases. Using two biomass availability scenarios established at two different price points (≤$40 per dry ton and ≤$60 per dry ton), the study examines how electrification and biomass resources can be used to meet near-term societal transportation needs when biomass use is prioritized towards different transportation sectors. We consider the transportation sector as a whole, including the light-duty, heavy-duty, marine, and aviation sectors. The results show that biofuels could fulfill about 27% of energy demand across the heavy-duty, aviation, and marine sector at ≤$40 per dry ton and more than 50% at ≤$60 per dry ton by 2050, while electrification could be the primary means of decarbonizing light-duty vehicles. While in 2050 transportation-related greenhouse gas emissions could be 26% lower than in the baseline case with extensive electrification of the light-duty sector, this percentage could be increased to 37% and 52% at ≤$40 per dry ton and ≤$60 per dry ton, respectively, with increased market penetration of biofuels in the other transportation sectors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Circular economy strategies for electric vehicle batteries reduce reliance on raw materials

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Decarbonising ships, planes and trucks: An analysis of suitable low-carbon fuels for the maritime, aviation and haulage sectors

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                SEFUA7
                Sustainable Energy & Fuels
                Sustainable Energy Fuels
                Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
                2398-4902
                February 01 2022
                2022
                : 6
                : 3
                : 721-735
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, USA
                [2 ]Northwestern-Argonne Institute of Science and Engineering, Evanston, IL, USA
                [3 ]Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
                [4 ]Center for Engineering Sustainability and Resilience, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
                Article
                10.1039/D1SE01742J
                ca9adb4a-3a31-4538-9652-ec562e72e5a4
                © 2022

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article