14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      What speech and language therapy do community dwelling stroke survivors with aphasia receive in the UK?

      research-article
      1 , * , 2 , 1
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Speech and language therapy provision for aphasia (a language disorder) post stroke has been studied over time through surveys completed by speech and language therapists. This paper revisits provision based on what was received by 278 patients in 21 UK speech and language therapy departments in 2014–2016.

          Aims

          To explore the speech and language therapy received by community dwelling people with post stroke aphasia in the UK.

          Methods and procedures

          A quantitative content analysis was conducted by two speech and language therapist researchers. Therapy goals recorded were coded into categories and subcategories. Descriptive statistics were used to identify the frequency with which goal categories were targeted, average therapy time received, length and frequency of therapy sessions, personnel involved and mode of delivery.

          Outcomes and results

          Forty-five percent of participants were in receipt of therapy in the three month window observed. Six goal categories were identified. Rehabilitation was the most frequent (60%) followed by enabling (17.2%), review (4.3%), assessment (3.6%), supportive (3.5%) and activity to support therapy (2.8%). The median amount of therapy received in three months was 6.3 hours at an average of one 60-minute session every two weeks. Seventy-seven percent of therapy sessions were delivered by qualified speech and language therapists and 23% by assistants. Ninety percent of sessions were one to one, face to face sessions whilst 9.5% were group sessions.

          Discussion

          In line with previous reports, speech and language therapy for community dwelling stroke survivors with aphasia is restricted. Rehabilitation is a large focus of therapy but the intensity and dose with which it is provided is substantially lower than that required for an effective outcome. Despite this, one to one face to face therapy is favoured. More efficient methods to support more therapeutic doses of therapy are not commonly used in routine clinical services.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke.

          Aphasia is an acquired language impairment following brain damage that affects some or all language modalities: expression and understanding of speech, reading, and writing. Approximately one third of people who have a stroke experience aphasia.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            What people with aphasia want: Their goals according to the ICF

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Computer therapy compared with usual care for people with long-standing aphasia poststroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

              The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial to study the effectiveness of self-managed computer treatment for people with long-standing aphasia after stroke. In this pilot single-blinded, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial participants with aphasia were allocated to self-managed computer treatment with volunteer support or usual care (everyday language activity). The 5-month intervention period was followed by 3 months without intervention to investigate treatment maintenance. Thirty-four participants were recruited. Seventeen participants were allocated to each group. Thirteen participants from the usual care group and 15 from the computer treatment group were followed up at 5 months. An average of 4 hours 43 minutes speech and language therapy time and 4 hours volunteer support time enabled an average of 25 hours of independent practice. The difference in percentage change in naming ability from baseline at 5 months between groups was 19.8% (95% CI, 4.4-35.2; P=0.014) in favor of the treatment group. Participants with more severe aphasia showed little benefit. Results demonstrate early indications of cost-effectiveness of self-managed computer therapy. This pilot trial indicates that self-managed computer therapy for aphasia is feasible and that it will be practical to recruit sufficient participants to conduct an appropriately powered clinical trial to investigate the effectiveness of self-managed computer therapy for people with long-standing aphasia. Clinical Trial Registration- www.controlled-trials.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN91534629.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: Formal analysisRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                10 July 2018
                2018
                : 13
                : 7
                : e0200096
                Affiliations
                [1 ] School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
                [2 ] Speech and Language Therapy, Derbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation Trust, Chesterfield, United Kingdom
                Kobenhavns Universitet, DENMARK
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2335-7104
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5177-7117
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1138-0147
                Article
                PONE-D-18-11182
                10.1371/journal.pone.0200096
                6039008
                29990345
                caa17549-8a6f-4cf4-aa35-97e69d49533d
                © 2018 Palmer et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 13 April 2018
                : 19 June 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 9, Tables: 4, Pages: 20
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000664, Health Technology Assessment Programme;
                Award ID: 12/21/01AB
                Award Recipient :
                This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme (12/21/01). Additional funding support was provided by the Tavistock Trust for Aphasia. The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Health Technology Assessment Programme, the National Institute for Health Research, the National Health Service or the Department of Health and Social Care. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Otorhinolaryngology
                Laryngology
                Speech-Language Pathology
                Speech Therapy
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Language
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Language
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Language
                Social Sciences
                Linguistics
                Speech
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Communications
                Social Communication
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Behavior
                Verbal Behavior
                Verbal Communication
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Age Groups
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Neurology
                Cerebrovascular Diseases
                Stroke
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Vascular Medicine
                Stroke
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Complementary and Alternative Medicine
                Exercise Therapy
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article