4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Risk Management Assessments and Recommendations Among Students, Staffs, and Health Care Workers in Educational Biomedical Laboratories

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Safety in laboratories is one of the most crucial topics for all educational institutes. All-hazards need to be identified, evaluated, and controlled whenever possible, following the risk management (RM) process. This study evaluates two academic laboratories’ risks and safety in the Department of Biomedical Science (BMS) at Qatar University (QU). The goal is to eliminate or reduce any risks to the students, teaching assistants, laboratory technicians, faculties, and other related workers, following an RM process.

          Methods

          A cross-sectional study was performed from January to March 2020 in the BMS at QU. The study sample comprised of microbiology and hematology laboratories. Checklists and data collection sheets were used for data collection. Hazard evaluation failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) was used. The risk priority number (RPN) was calculated for all the identified hazards. For hazard control, the hierarchy of controls was followed.

          Results

          The number of identified hazards was thirteen (n=13) in the hematology laboratory and sixteen (n=16) in the microbiology laboratory. Chemical and ergonomic hazards had the highest percentages in both laboratories, with 25% in the microbiology laboratory and 31% in the hematology laboratory. Both laboratories were free from radiation hazards. There is a significant difference between adopted and recommended control measures in each laboratory in terms of likelihood, severity, and risk priority number (RPN).

          Conclusion

          Both chemical and ergonomic hazards account for almost a quarter of the hazards in both laboratories. The recommended control measure can decrease the severity and likelihood of identified hazards.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Laboratory-Acquired Infections

          Abstract Laboratory-acquired infections due to a wide variety of bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites have been described. Although the precise risk of infection after an exposure remains poorly defined, surveys of laboratory-acquired infections suggest that Brucella species, Shigella species, Salmonella species, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and Neisseria meningitidis are the most common causes. Infections due to the bloodborne pathogens (hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and human immunodeficiency virus) remain the most common reported viral infections, whereas the dimorphic fungi are responsible for the greatest number of fungal infections. Because of the increasing attention on the role of the laboratory in bioterrorism preparation, I discuss the risk of laboratory-acquired infection with uncommon agents, such as Francisella tularensis and Bacillus anthracis. Physicians who care for a sick laboratory worker need to consider the likelihood of an occupationally acquired infection while advising exposed laboratory workers about postexposure prophylaxis. In addition, physicians should be aware of the importance of alerting the laboratory if infection with a high-risk agent is suspected.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Overcoming COVID-19: What can human factors and ergonomics offer?

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Occupational Health Hazards of Working in the Interventional Laboratory

              The occupational hazards of working in the interventional laboratory have been inadequately studied for physicians and remain unaddressed for nonphysician personnel.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Risk Manag Healthc Policy
                Risk Manag Healthc Policy
                rmhp
                rmhp
                Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
                Dove
                1179-1594
                15 January 2021
                2021
                : 14
                : 185-198
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Biomedical Sciences Department, College of Health Sciences, QU-Health, Qatar University , Doha, Qatar
                [2 ]Biomedical Research Center (BRC), Qatar University , Doha, Qatar
                [3 ]Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Research Unit, QU- Health, Qatar University , Doha, Qatar
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Nasser M Rizk Biomedical Sciences Department, College of Health Sciences- QU Health, Qatar University , Room E120- Building C01, P.O. Box: 2713, Doha, Qatar Email nassrizk@qu.edu.qa
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6541-7654
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0502-965X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6288-3609
                Article
                278162
                10.2147/RMHP.S278162
                7816217
                cac4bd68-eb33-4625-b7f3-0112ca38b608
                © 2021 AlShammari et al.

                This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 29 August 2020
                : 03 December 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 11, References: 37, Pages: 14
                Categories
                Original Research

                Social policy & Welfare
                risk management,education laboratories,failure modes and effects analysis,risk priority number,risk control

                Comments

                Comment on this article