55
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Update: Interim Guidance for Health Care Providers Evaluating and Caring for Patients with Suspected E-cigarette, or Vaping, Product Use Associated Lung Injury — United States, October 2019

      research-article
      , MD 1 , , , MD 1 , , MD 1 , , DO 2 , 3 , , MD 3 , 4 , , PhD 5 , 6 , , MD 6 , 7 , , MD 8 , , MD 1 , , MD 9 , , DO 10 , , MPH 5 , 11 , , PhD 4 , , MPH 9 , , MEd 1 , , MPH 1 , , MD 9 , , PhD 1 , , PharmD, DrPH 12 , , PharmD 5 , , MD 10 , , MD, PhD 5 , Lung Injury Response Clinical Working Group, Lung Injury Response Epidemiology/Surveillance Group Lung Injury Response Clinical Working Group, Lung Injury Response Epidemiology/Surveillance Group Lung Injury Response Clinical Working Group, Lung Injury Response Epidemiology/Surveillance Group , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
      Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
      Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          On October 11, 2019, this report was posted online as an MMWR Early Release. CDC, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), state and local health departments, and public health and clinical partners are investigating a multistate outbreak of lung injury associated with the use of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette), or vaping, products. In late August, CDC released recommendations for health care providers regarding e-cigarette, or vaping, product use associated lung injury (EVALI) based on limited data from the first reported cases ( 1 , 2 ). This report summarizes national surveillance data describing clinical features of more recently reported cases and interim recommendations based on these data for U.S. health care providers caring for patients with suspected or known EVALI. It provides interim guidance for 1) initial clinical evaluation; 2) suggested criteria for hospital admission and treatment; 3) patient follow-up; 4) special considerations for groups at high risk; and 5) clinical and public health recommendations. Health care providers evaluating patients suspected to have EVALI should ask about the use of e-cigarette, or vaping, products in a nonjudgmental and thorough manner. Patients suspected to have EVALI should have a chest radiograph (CXR), and hospital admission is recommended for patients who have decreased blood oxygen (O2) saturation (<95%) on room air or who are in respiratory distress. Health care providers should consider empiric use of a combination of antibiotics, antivirals, or steroids based upon clinical context. Evidence-based tobacco product cessation strategies, including behavioral counseling, are recommended to help patients discontinue use of e-cigarette, or vaping, products. To reduce the risk of recurrence, patients who have been treated for EVALI should not use e-cigarette, or vaping, products. CDC recommends that persons should not use e-cigarette, or vaping, products that contain tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). At present, CDC recommends persons consider refraining from using e-cigarette, or vaping, products that contain nicotine. Irrespective of the ongoing investigation, e-cigarette, or vaping, products should never be used by youths, young adults, or women who are pregnant. Persons who do not currently use tobacco products should not start using e-cigarette, or vaping, products. As of October 8, 2019, 49 states, the District of Columbia, and one territorial health department have reported 1,299 cases of EVALI to CDC, with 26 deaths reported from 21 states (median age of death = 49 years, range = 17–75 years). Among 1,043 patients with available data on age and sex, 70% were male, and the median age was 24 years (range = 13–75 years); 80% were aged <35 years, and 15% were aged <18 years. Among 573 patients who reported information on substances used in e-cigarette, or vaping, products in the 90 days preceding symptom onset, 76% reported using THC-containing products, and 58% reported using nicotine-containing products; 32% reported exclusive use of THC-containing products, and 13% reported exclusive use of nicotine-containing products.* No single compound or ingredient has emerged as the cause of these injuries to date, and there might be more than one cause. Available data suggest THC-containing products play a role in this outbreak, but the specific chemical or chemicals responsible for EVALI have not yet been identified, and nicotine-containing products have not been excluded as a possible cause. Ongoing federal and state investigations have provided information about the clinical characteristics of cases and a surveillance case definition for confirmed and probable cases has been developed ( 1 ); this case definition † is not intended to guide clinical care. To inform CDC’s updated interim clinical guidance, on October 2, 2019, CDC obtained individual expert perspectives on the evaluation and treatment of patients with suspected EVALI. Discussions occurred with nine national experts in adult and pediatric pulmonary medicine and critical care who were designated by professional medical societies to participate (Lung Injury Response Clinical Working Group). Evidence supporting CDC’s recommendations include data from medical abstractions reported to CDC, previously published case series ( 3 – 5 ), and the aforementioned individual expert opinions. Clinical Evaluation for Patients with Suspected EVALI EVALI is considered a diagnosis of exclusion because, at present, no specific test or marker exists for its diagnosis (Box 1). Health care providers should consider multiple etiologies, including the possibility of EVALI and concomitant infection. In addition, health care providers should evaluate alternative diagnoses as suggested by clinical findings and medical history (e.g., cardiac, gastrointestinal, rheumatologic, and neoplastic processes; environmental or occupational exposures; or causes of acute respiratory distress syndrome) ( 6 ). BOX 1 Clinical evaluation for patients with recent history of use of e-cigarette, or vaping, products and suspected lung injury History Ask about respiratory, gastrointestinal, and constitutional symptoms (e.g., cough, chest pain, shortness of breath, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever) for patients who report a history of use of e-cigarette, or vaping, products. Ask all patients about recent use of e-cigarette, or vaping, products. Types of substances used (e.g., tetrahydrocannabinol [THC], cannabis [oil, dabs], nicotine, modified products or the addition of substances not intended by the manufacturer); product source, specific product brand and name; duration and frequency of use, time of last use; product delivery system, and method of use (aerosolization, dabbing, or dripping). Physical exam Assess vital signs and oxygen saturation via pulse-oximetry. Laboratory testing Infectious disease evaluation might include Respiratory viral panel including influenza testing during flu season, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, endemic mycoses, and opportunistic infections. Initial laboratory evaluation Consider complete blood count with differential, liver transaminases, and inflammatory markers (e.g., erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein). In all patients, consider conducting urine toxicology testing, with informed consent, including testing for THC. Imaging Chest radiograph. Consider chest computed tomography for evaluation of severe or worsening disease, complications, other illnesses, or when chest x-ray result does not correlate with clinical findings. Other considerations Further evaluation of patients meeting inpatient admission criteria might include Consultation with pulmonary, critical care, medical toxicology, infectious disease, psychology, psychiatry, and addiction medicine specialists. Additional testing with bronchoalveolar lavage or lung biopsy as clinically indicated, in consultation with pulmonary specialists. Patient history. Based upon medical chart abstraction data submitted to CDC, 95% (323/339) of patients diagnosed with EVALI initially experienced respiratory symptoms (e.g., cough, chest pain, and shortness of breath), and 77% (262/339) had gastrointestinal symptoms (e.g., abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea). Gastrointestinal symptoms preceded respiratory symptoms in some patients ( 1 – 3 ). Respiratory or gastrointestinal symptoms were accompanied by constitutional symptoms such as fever, chills, and weight loss among 85% (289/339) of patients (Table). TABLE Characteristics of patients (N = 342) with e-cigarette use, or vaping, product use associated lung injury (EVALI),* from national EVALI surveillance reports to CDC — United States, 2019 † Characteristic EVALI patients No. (%) Total no. used in calculation§ Age, median (range) (yrs) 22 (13–71) 338 Symptoms reported Any respiratory 323 (95) 339 Any gastrointestinal 262 (77) 339 Any constitutional¶ 289 (85) 339 Vital signs Oxygen saturation <95% while breathing room air 143 (57) 253 Tachycardia (heart rate >100 beats/min) 169 (55) 310 Tachypnea (respiratory rate >20 breaths/min) 77 (45) 172 Clinical course Admission to intensive care unit 159 (47) 342 Age group (yrs) 13–17 45 (56) 80 18–24 49 (38) 130 25–50 54 (47) 115 ≥51 9 (69) 13 Past cardiac disease** 8 (50) 16 No past cardiac disease 151 (46) 326 Intubation and mechanical ventilation 74 (22) 338 Age group (yrs) 13–17 23 (29) 80 18–24 21 (16) 130 25–50 23 (20) 115 ≥51 7 (54) 13 Past cardiac disease** 5 (31) 16 No past cardiac disease 70 (21) 326 Corticosteroids 252 (88) 287 Improved after corticosteroids 114 (82) 140 Duration of hospitalization (days) Mean (median) Range Age group (yrs) 13–17 6.9 (6) 0–23 18–24 6.2 (5) 0–38 25–50 6.6 (6) 0–40 ≥51 14.8 (12) 3–31 Past cardiac disease 8.9 (4) 3–31 No past cardiac disease 6.6 (5) 0–40 Average hospital stay 6.7 (5) 0–40 Abbreviation: E-cigarette = electronic cigarette. * For cases that had full medical chart abstraction data available. † Surveillance data through October 3, 2019, from the following 29 U.S states: Alabama, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. § Patients with missing data were excluded from denominators for selected characteristics. ¶ Self-reported fever, chills, and unexpected weight loss. ** Heart failure, heart attack, or other heart conditions. All health care providers evaluating patients for EVALI should ask about the use of e-cigarette, or vaping, products and ideally should ask about types of substances used (e.g., THC, cannabis [oil, dabs], nicotine, modified products or the addition of substances not intended by the manufacturer); product source, specific product brand and name; duration and frequency of use, time of last use; product delivery system, and method of use (aerosolization, dabbing, or dripping). Empathetic, nonjudgmental, and private questioning of patients regarding sensitive information to assure confidentiality should be employed. Standardized approaches should be used for interviewing adolescents. Resources exist to guide patient interviews, including those of adolescents. § In some situations, asking questions over the course of the hospitalization or during follow-up visits might elicit additional information about exposures, especially as trust is established between the patient and clinicians. Physical examination. For patients who report the use of e-cigarette, or vaping, products, physical examination should include vital signs and pulse-oximetry. Tachycardia was reported in 55% (169/310) of patients and tachypnea in 45% (77/172); O2 saturation <95% at rest on room air was present for 57% (143/253) of patients reported to CDC (Table), underscoring the need for routine pulse-oximetry. Among patients identified to date, pulmonary findings on auscultation exam have often been unremarkable, even among patients with severe lung injury (personal communication, Lung Injury Response Clinical Working Group, October 2, 2019). Laboratory testing. Laboratory testing should be guided by clinical findings. A respiratory virus panel, including influenza testing during influenza season, should be strongly considered. Additional testing should be based on published guidelines for evaluation of community-acquired pneumonia. ¶ Infectious diseases to consider include Streptococcus pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, endemic mycoses, and opportunistic infections; the likelihood of infection by any of these varies by geographic prevalence and patient medical history. Other abnormal laboratory tests reported in patients with EVALI include elevated white blood cell (WBC) count, serum inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]), and liver transaminases. In a report of initial patients from Illinois and Wisconsin, 87% had a WBC >11,000/mm3 and 93% had an ESR >30mm/hr; 50% of patients had elevated liver transaminases (aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase >35 U/L) ( 3 ). However, at this time, these tests cannot be used to distinguish EVALI from infectious etiologies. In all patients, providers should consider conducting, with informed consent, urine toxicology testing, including testing for THC. Imaging. Radiographic findings consistent with EVALI include pulmonary infiltrates on CXR and opacities on chest computed tomography (CT) scan ( 1 , 7 ). A CXR should be obtained on all patients with a history of e-cigarette, or vaping, product use who have respiratory or gastrointestinal symptoms, particularly when accompanied by decreased O2 saturation (<95%). Chest CT might be useful when the CXR result does not correlate with clinical findings or to evaluate severe or worsening disease, complications such as pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum, or other illnesses in the differential diagnosis, such as pneumonia or pulmonary embolism. In some cases, chest CT has demonstrated findings such as bilateral ground glass opacities despite a normal or nondiagnostic CXR ( 3 ). Among patients with abnormal CXR findings and a clinical picture consistent with EVALI, a chest CT scan might not be necessary for diagnosis. The decision to obtain a chest CT should be made on a case-by-case basis depending on the clinical circumstances. Consultation with specialists. Consultation with several specialists might be necessary to optimize patient management. For patients being evaluated for possible EVALI, consideration should be given to consultation with a pulmonologist, who can help guide further evaluation, recommend empiric treatment, and review the indications for bronchoscopy. The decision to perform bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) to rule out alternative diagnoses such as pulmonary infection should be made on a case-by-case basis. The value of staining BAL cells or fresh lung biopsy tissue for lipid-laden macrophages (e.g., using oil red O or Sudan Black) in the evaluation of EVALI remains unknown. In addition, there should be a low threshold for consulting with critical care physicians, because, based upon data submitted to CDC, 47% (159/342) of patients were admitted to an intensive care unit and 22% (74/338) required endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation (Table); critical care physicians should be consulted to determine optimal management of respiratory failure. Consultation with medical toxicology, infectious disease, psychology, psychiatry, addiction medicine, and other specialists should be considered as warranted by patient circumstances. Management of Patients with Suspected EVALI Admission criteria and outpatient management. Several factors should be considered when deciding whether to admit a patient with potential EVALI to the hospital (Box 2). Among 1,002 cases reported to CDC with available data as of October 8, 96% of patients were hospitalized. Patients with suspected EVALI should be admitted if they have decreased O2 saturation (<95%) on room air, are in respiratory distress, or have comorbidities that compromise pulmonary reserve. Consider modifying factors such as altitude to guide interpretation of measured O2 saturation. BOX 2 Management of patients with suspected e-cigarette, or vaping, product use associated lung injury (EVALI) Admission criteria and outpatient management Strongly consider admitting patients with potential lung injury, especially if respiratory distress present, have comorbidities that compromise pulmonary reserve, or decreased (<95%) O2 saturation (consider modifying factors such as altitude to guide interpretation). Outpatient management for patients with suspected lung injury who have less severe injury might be considered on a case-by-case basis. Medical treatment Consider initiation of corticosteroids. Early initiation of antimicrobial coverage for community-acquired pneumonia should be strongly considered in accordance with established guidelines.* Consider influenza antivirals in accordance with established guidelines. † Patients not admitted to hospital Recommend follow-up within 24–48 hours to assess and manage possible worsening lung injury. Outpatients should have normal oxygen saturation, reliable access to care and social support systems, and be instructed to promptly seek medical care if respiratory symptoms worsen. Consider empiric use of antimicrobials and antivirals. Post-hospital discharge follow-up Schedule follow-up visit no later than 1–2 weeks after discharge that includes pulse-oximetry testing. Consider additional follow-up testing including spirometry and diffusion capacity testing, and consider repeat chest radiograph in 1–2 months. Consider endocrinology consultation for patients treated with high-dose corticosteroids. Cessation services and preventive care Strongly advise patients to discontinue use of e-cigarette, or vaping, products. Provide education and cessation assistance for patients to aid nicotine addiction and treatment or referral for patients with marijuana-use-disorder. § Emphasize importance of routine influenza vaccination. ¶ Consider pneumococcal vaccine.** * https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/full/10.1164/rccm.201908-1581ST#readcube-epdf; https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/53/7/e25/424286/. † https://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/antivirals/summary-clinicians.htm; https://www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/influenza/. § Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administrations treatment locator (https://www.samhsa.gov/find-treatment)to find treatment in your area or call 1–800–662-HELP (4357). ¶ https://www.cdc.gov/flu/prevent/vaccinations.htm. ** https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6337a4.htm?s_cid. Outpatient management of suspected EVALI might be considered on a case-by-case basis for patients who are clinically stable, have less severe injury, and for whom follow-up within 24–48 hours of initial evaluation can be assured. Candidates for outpatient management should have normal O2 saturation (≥95%), reliable access to care, and strong social support systems. For these patients, empiric use of antimicrobials, including antivirals, if indicated, should be considered. Some patients who initially had mild symptoms experienced a rapid worsening of symptoms within 48 hours. In Illinois and Wisconsin, 72% of patients had either an outpatient or emergency department visit before seeking additional medical care that resulted in hospital admission ( 3 ). Health care providers should instruct all patients to seek medical care promptly if respiratory symptoms worsen. Medical treatment. Corticosteroids might be helpful in treating this injury. Several case reports describe improvement with corticosteroids, likely because of a blunting of the inflammatory response ( 3 – 5 ). In a series of patients in Illinois and Wisconsin, 92% of 50 patients received corticosteroids; the medical team documented in 65% of 46 patient notes that “respiratory improvement was due to the use of glucocorticoids” ( 3 ). Among 140 cases reported nationally to CDC that received corticosteroids, 82% of patients improved (Table). However, the natural progression of this injury is not known, and it is possible that patients might recover without corticosteroids or by avoiding use of e-cigarette, or vaping, products. In some circumstances, it would be advisable to withhold corticosteroids while evaluating patients for infectious etiologies, such as fungal pneumonia, that might worsen with corticosteroid treatment. Nevertheless, because the diagnosis remains one of exclusion, aggressive empiric therapy with corticosteroids, antimicrobial, and antiviral therapy might be warranted for patients with severe illness. A range of corticosteroid doses, durations, and taper plans might be considered on a case-by-case basis. Whenever possible, decisions on the use of corticosteroids and dosing regimen should be made in consultation with a pulmonologist. Early initiation of antimicrobial treatment for community-acquired pneumonia in accordance with established guidelines** should be strongly considered given the overlapping of signs and symptoms in these conditions. During influenza season, health care providers should consider influenza in all patients with suspected EVALI. Antivirals should be considered in accordance with established guidelines. †† Decisions on initiation or discontinuation of treatment should be based on specific clinical features and, when appropriate, in consultation with specialists. Follow-up from hospital admission. Patients discharged from the hospital after inpatient treatment for EVALI should have a follow-up visit no later than 1–2 weeks after discharge that includes pulse-oximetry, and clinicians should consider repeating the CXR. Additional follow-up testing 1–2 months after discharge that might include spirometry, diffusion capacity testing, and CXR should be considered. Long-term effects and the risk of recurrence of EVALI are not known. Whereas many patients’ symptoms resolved, clinicians report that some patients have relapsed during corticosteroid tapers after hospitalization, underscoring the need for close follow-up (personal communication, Lung Injury Response Clinical Working Group, October 2, 2019). Some patients have had persistent hypoxemia (O2 saturation <95%), requiring home oxygen at discharge and might need ongoing pulmonary follow-up. Patients treated with high-dose corticosteroids might require care from an endocrinologist to monitor adrenal function. It is unknown if patients with a history of EVALI are at higher risk for severe complications of influenza or other respiratory viral infections if they are infected simultaneously or after recovering from lung injury. Health care providers should emphasize the importance of annual vaccination against influenza for all persons >6 months of age, including patients with a history of EVALI. In addition, administration of pneumococcal vaccine should be considered according to current guidelines. §§ Addressing exposures. Advising patients to discontinue use of e-cigarette, or vaping, products should be an integral part of the care approach during an inpatient admission and should be re-emphasized during outpatient follow-up. Cessation of e-cigarette, or vaping, products might speed recovery from this injury; resuming use of e-cigarette, or vaping, products has the potential to cause recurrence of symptoms or lung injury. Evidence-based tobacco product cessation strategies include behavioral counseling and FDA-approved cessation medications. ¶¶ For patients who have addiction to THC-containing or nicotine-containing products, cognitive-behavioral therapy, contingency management, motivational enhancement therapy, and multidimensional family therapy have been shown to help, and consultation with addiction medicine services should be considered ( 8 – 10 ). Special considerations for groups at high risk. Patients with certain characteristics or comorbidities, including older age, history of cardiac or lung disease, or pregnancy, might be at higher risk for more severe outcomes. Among reported cases (Table), patients aged >50 years experienced the highest percentage of endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation (54%) and the longest mean inpatient stays (15 days). The mean first recorded O2 saturations among those who did and did not require intubation were 87% and 92%, respectively (data not shown). Among those with and without past cardiac disease, 31% and 21%, respectively, required intubation (Table). Special consideration might need to be given to patients aged >50 years, because these patients might require longer duration of hospitalization and have a higher risk of intubation (Figure). Rapid identification of exposure, a high index of suspicion of EVALI, initiation of corticosteroids, and specialist consultations might be lifesaving in this patient population. FIGURE Percentage of persons needing intubation (N = 338) and hospitalization (N = 242) among patients with e-cigarette, or vaping, product use associated lung injury (EVALI), by age of patient — United States, February 1–October 3, 2019*,†<Fig_Large></Fig_Large> Abbreviation: E-cigarette = electronic cigarette. * Data reported through October 3, 2019, from the following 29 states: Alabama, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. † 95% confidence intervals indicated by error bars. The figure consists of two bar charts showing the percentage of U.S. persons needing intubation (N = 338) and hospitalization (N = 242) among patients with lung injury associated with e-cigarette, or vaping, product use, by age of patient, based on reports from 29 states during February 1–October 3, 2019. Additional data might identify other groups at high risk, provide important information about disparities in outcomes, and help guide clinical care. Certain patients, such as adolescents and young adults, might benefit from specialized services, such as addiction treatment services and providers who have experience with counseling and behavioral health follow-up. Clinical Care and Public Health Recommendations Reporting cases to state, local, territorial, or tribal health departments is critical for accurate surveillance of EVALI. Reporting cases and obtaining and sending products, devices, and clinical and pathologic specimens for testing, can help health departments and CDC determine the cause or causes of these lung injuries.*** CDC is developing International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition, Clinical Modification coding guidance for health care encounters related to EVALI. Updates, when available, can be found at https://www.cdc.gov/lunginjury (Box 3). BOX 3 Clinical Care and Public Health Reporting of e-cigarette, or vaping, product use associated lung injury (EVALI) Considerations at points of care Examples include emergency departments, urgent care, doctors’ offices, etc. Consider posting reminders or signage to encourage conversation between patients and providers about use of e-cigarette, or vaping, products.* Report cases of lung injury associated with use of e-cigarette, or vaping, products within the past 90 days to state or local health department. Determine whether any remaining product, including devices and liquids, is available for testing. Testing can be coordinated with health departments. CDC is developing International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) coding guidance for healthcare encounters related to EVALI. Updates, when available, will be at https://www.cdc.gov/lunginjury. Clinical specimen testing by CDC † Consider submission of any collected specimens, including bronchoalveolar lavage, blood, or urine, to CDC for evaluation. Testing of pathologic specimens by CDC § If a lung biopsy or autopsy is performed on a patient suspected of lung injury related to e-cigarette, or vaping, product use, consider submission of fixed lung biopsy tissues or autopsy tissues to CDC for evaluation. Testing can include evaluation for lipids on formalin-fixed (wet) lung tissues that have not undergone routine processing. Routine microscopic examination will be performed, as well as infectious disease testing, if indicated, on formalin-fixed (wet) tissues, or formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens. * https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/basic_information/e-cigarettes/severe-lung-disease/healthcare-providers/index.html. † https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/basic_information/e-cigarettes/severe-lung-disease/health-departments/index.html. § https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/basic_information/e-cigarettes/severe-lung-disease/health-departments/index.html. Public health recommendations. At this time, FDA and CDC have not identified the cause or causes of the lung injuries among EVALI cases, and the only commonality among all cases is that patients report the use of e-cigarette, or vaping, products. This outbreak might have more than one cause, and many different substances and product sources are still under investigation. To date, national and state data suggest that products containing THC, particularly those obtained off the street or from other informal sources (e.g., friends, family members, or illicit dealers), are linked to most of the cases and play a major role in the outbreak ( 11 , 12 ). Therefore, CDC recommends that persons should not use e-cigarette, or vaping, products that contain THC. Persons should not buy any type of e-cigarette, or vaping, products, particularly those containing THC, off the street. Persons should not modify or add any substances to e-cigarette, or vaping, products that are not intended by the manufacturer, including products purchased through retail establishments. Given that the exclusive use of nicotine-containing products has been reported by a small percentage of persons with EVALI, and that many persons with EVALI report combined use of THC- and nicotine-containing products, the possibility that nicotine-containing products play a role in this outbreak cannot be excluded. Therefore, at present, CDC continues to recommend that persons consider refraining from using e-cigarette, or vaping, products that contain nicotine. If adults are using e-cigarette, or vaping, products to quit cigarette smoking, they should not return to smoking cigarettes; they should use evidence-based treatments, including health care provider counseling and FDA-approved medications. ††† If persons continue to use these products, they should carefully monitor themselves for symptoms and see a health care provider immediately if symptoms develop. Irrespective of the ongoing investigation, e-cigarette, or vaping, products should never be used by youths, young adults, or women who are pregnant. There is no safe tobacco product, and the use of any tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, carries a risk. Therefore, persons who do not currently use tobacco products should not start using e-cigarette, or vaping, products. This investigation is ongoing. CDC will continue to work in collaboration with FDA and state and local partners to investigate cases and to update guidance, as appropriate, as new data emerges from this complex outbreak. Summary What is already known about this topic? Forty-nine states, the District of Columbia, and one U.S. territory have reported 1,299 cases of lung injury associated with the use of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette), or vaping, products. Twenty-six deaths have been reported from 21 states. What is added by this report? Based on the most current data, CDC’s updated interim guidance provides a framework for health care providers in their initial assessment, evaluation, management, and follow-up of persons with symptoms of e-cigarette, or vaping, product use associated lung injury (EVALI). What are the implications for public health practice? Rapid recognition by health care providers of patients with EVALI and an increased understanding of treatment considerations could reduce morbidity and mortality associated with this injury.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Pulmonary Illness Related to E-Cigarette Use in Illinois and Wisconsin — Preliminary Report

          New England Journal of Medicine
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Severe Pulmonary Disease Associated with Electronic-Cigarette–Product Use — Interim Guidance

            On September 6, 2019, this report was posted as an MMWR Early Release on the MMWR website (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr). As of August 27, 2019, 215 possible cases of severe pulmonary disease associated with the use of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) products (e.g., devices, liquids, refill pods, and cartridges) had been reported to CDC by 25 state health departments. E-cigarettes are devices that produce an aerosol by heating a liquid containing various chemicals, including nicotine, flavorings, and other additives (e.g., propellants, solvents, and oils). Users inhale the aerosol, including any additives, into their lungs. Aerosols produced by e-cigarettes can contain harmful or potentially harmful substances, including heavy metals such as lead, volatile organic compounds, ultrafine particles, cancer-causing chemicals, or other agents such as chemicals used for cleaning the device ( 1 ). E-cigarettes also can be used to deliver tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the principal psychoactive component of cannabis, or other drugs; for example, “dabbing” involves superheating substances that contain high concentrations of THC and other plant compounds (e.g., cannabidiol) with the intent of inhaling the aerosol. E-cigarette users could potentially add other substances to the devices. This report summarizes available information and provides interim case definitions and guidance for reporting possible cases of severe pulmonary disease. The guidance in this report reflects data available as of September 6, 2019; guidance will be updated as additional information becomes available. Preliminary reports from state health department investigations, a published case series of patients in Illinois and Wisconsin ( 2 ), and three other published case series ( 3 – 5 ), describe clinical features of pulmonary illness associated with e-cigarette product use. According to these reports, the onset of respiratory findings, which might include a nonproductive cough, pleuritic chest pain, or shortness of breath, appears to occur over several days to several weeks before hospitalization. Systemic findings might include tachycardia, fever, chills, or fatigue; reported gastrointestinal findings, which have preceded respiratory findings in some cases, have included nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and diarrhea. Most identified patients have been hospitalized with hypoxemia, which, in some cases, has progressed to acute or subacute respiratory failure. Patients have required respiratory support therapies ranging from supplemental oxygen to endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. Many patients initially received a diagnosis of infection and were treated empirically with antibiotics without improvement. In the largest cohort, 53 patients from Illinois and Wisconsin ( 2 ), the six-patient case series in Utah ( 4 ), and in the five North Carolina patients described in a report in this issue of MMWR ( 3 ), many of the patients who were treated with corticosteroids improved. All patients described in these reports to date have had abnormal radiographic findings, including infiltrates on chest radiograph and ground glass opacities on chest computed tomography scan. All patients have a reported history of e-cigarette product use, and no consistent evidence of an infectious etiology has been discovered. Therefore, the suspected cause is a chemical exposure. The type, extent, and severity of any chemical-related illness might depend on multiple factors including the chemical to which the user was exposed; chemical changes associated with heating, dose, frequency, and duration of exposure; product delivery methods; and behaviors and medical conditions of the user. The specific behaviors and exposures of identified patients have varied. Most have reported a history of using e-cigarette products containing cannabinoids such as THC, some have reported the use of e-cigarette products containing only nicotine, and others have reported using both. No consistent e-cigarette product, substance, or additive has been identified in all cases, nor has any one product or substance been conclusively linked to pulmonary disease in patients. Health care providers who cared for the five North Carolina patients diagnosed acute exogenous lipoid pneumonia in all patients based on history of e-cigarette use and clinical, radiographic, laboratory, and bronchoscopy findings. Specifically, the authors identified lipids within alveolar macrophages from the three bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens stained with oil red O. All five patients reported using marijuana oils or concentrates in e-cigarettes, and three also reported using nicotine ( 3 ). In a report describing the clinical course and outcomes of six patients from Utah, health care providers described the potential diagnostic utility of identification of lipid-laden macrophages from BAL specimens ( 4 ). Among the 53 cases from Illinois and Wisconsin, however, the pathologic findings were heterogeneous. Whereas almost half (24/53) of these patients underwent BAL, seven reports described the use of oil red O stain that identified lipid-laden macrophages ( 2 ). Additional pathologic analyses are in progress on specimens from some of these patients ( 2 ). The clinical significance of lipid-laden macrophages is currently unclear. It is not known whether the lipid is exogenous (from inhaled material) or endogenous (from altered lipid metabolism). In addition, it is not known whether lipid-laden macrophages are a marker of exposure to e-cigarette aerosol or they are central to the disease process. CDC is currently coordinating a multistate investigation. Investigations in affected states are focused on describing exposures and the epidemiologic, clinical, laboratory, and behavioral characteristics of cases. In conjunction with a task force from the Council for State and Territorial Epidemiologists and affected states, interim outbreak surveillance case definitions* (Table), data collection tools, and a database to collect relevant patient data have been developed and released. The interim outbreak case definitions will be updated as necessary as additional information becomes available. TABLE CDC surveillance case definitions* for severe pulmonary disease associated with e-cigarette use — August 30, 2019 Case classification Criteria Confirmed Using an e-cigarette (“vaping”) or dabbing† during the 90 days before symptom onset      AND Pulmonary infiltrate, such as opacities on plain film chest radiograph or ground-glass opacities on chest computed tomography      AND Absence of pulmonary infection on initial work-up: Minimum criteria include negative respiratory viral panel, influenza polymerase chain reaction or rapid test if local epidemiology supports testing. All other clinically indicated respiratory infectious disease testing (e.g., urine antigen for Streptococcus pneumoniae and Legionella, sputum culture if productive cough, bronchoalveolar lavage culture if done, blood culture, human immunodeficiency virus–related opportunistic respiratory infections if appropriate) must be negative      AND No evidence in medical record of alternative plausible diagnoses (e.g., cardiac, rheumatologic, or neoplastic process). Probable Using an e-cigarette (“vaping”) or dabbing† in 90 days before symptom onset      AND Pulmonary infiltrate, such as opacities on plain film chest radiograph or ground-glass opacities on chest computed tomography      AND Infection identified via culture or polymerase chain reaction, but clinical team§ believes this is not the sole cause of the underlying respiratory disease process OR minimum criteria to rule out pulmonary infection not met (testing not performed) and clinical team§ believes this is not the sole cause of the underlying respiratory disease process      AND No evidence in medical record of alternative plausible diagnoses (e.g., cardiac, rheumatologic, or neoplastic process). * These surveillance case definitions are meant for surveillance and not clinical diagnosis; they are subject to change and will be updated as additional information becomes available if needed. † Using an electronic device (e.g., electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS), electronic cigarette (e-cigarette), vaporizer, vape(s), vape pen, dab pen, or other device) or dabbing to inhale substances (e.g., nicotine, marijuana, tetrahydrocannabinol, tetrahydrocannabinol concentrates, cannabinoids, synthetic cannabinoids, flavorings, or other substances). § Clinical team caring for the patient. CDC has provided technical assistance to states and has issued a Clinical Action alert through its Clinician Outreach and Communication Activity network on August 16, 2019 ( 6 ), and has initiated data collection from states. CDC staff members have deployed to Illinois and Wisconsin, the first states that identified patients, as part of an epidemiologic assistance investigation to assist with their state investigations and continue to work closely with affected states to characterize the exposures and the extent and progression of this illness. CDC is working closely with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to facilitate collection of information regarding recent e-cigarette product use among patients and to provide technical assistance related to product samples associated with patients for chemical analysis of remaining substances or chemicals within the e-cigarettes. FDA is focused on processing targeted product samples associated with clinical illness and will analyze samples if there is enough material to test. Those with questions regarding the collection of e-cigarette products for possible testing by FDA should use the following e-mail address: FDAVapingSampleInquiries@fda.hhs.gov. On August 30, 2019, CDC published recommendations for clinicians, public health officials, and the public based on preliminary information obtained from states and treating clinicians as a Health Advisory ( 7 ). CDC has created a website (https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/basic_information/e-cigarettes/severe-lung-disease.html) ( 8 ) to disseminate up-to-date information and has created a dedicated e-mail address for clinicians and health officials to use to communicate about this public health emergency response (VapingAssocIllness@cdc.gov). Clinicians are encouraged to consider e-cigarette-associated pulmonary disease as one possible etiology in the broad differential diagnosis of patients with pulmonary disease and a history of e-cigarette product use. Clinicians should evaluate and treat for other possible cases of illness (e.g., infectious, rheumatologic, neoplastic, or other) as clinically indicated. They should report possible cases † to their local or state health department for further investigation. If e-cigarette product use is suspected as a possible etiology for a patient’s pulmonary disease, a detailed history of the substances used, the sources, and the devices used should be obtained, as outlined in the Health Advisory ( 7 ), and efforts should be made to determine if any remaining product, devices, or liquids are available for testing. Additional recommendations for clinicians, public health officials, and the public are available and will be updated as needed ( 6 – 8 ). Clinicians should contact their local or state health departments for further guidance as needed. State public health officials should promptly notify CDC about possible cases and refer to CDC for the most recent versions of the surveillance case definitions, reporting guidelines, and case investigation forms. Public health officials seeking these documents should e-mail CDC at eocevent101@cdc.gov. CDC will revise these tools as new information becomes available and disseminate them to state health departments. General questions regarding this outbreak can be answered by telephoning CDC-INFO (https://www.cdc.gov/cdc-info/index.html). While this investigation is ongoing and the definitive cause of reported illnesses remains uncertain, persons should consider not using e-cigarette products. Those who do use e-cigarette products should monitor themselves for symptoms (e.g., cough, shortness of breath, chest pain, nausea, vomiting, or other symptoms) and seek medical attention for any health concerns. Regardless of the ongoing investigation, persons who use e-cigarette products should not buy these products off the street and should not modify e-cigarette products or add any substances that are not intended by the manufacturer. E-cigarette products should never be used by youths, young adults, pregnant women, or by adults who do not currently use tobacco products. Adult smokers who are attempting to quit should use evidence-based smoking cessation treatments, including counseling and FDA-approved medications; those who need help quitting tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, should contact their medical provider. Persons who are concerned about harmful effects from e-cigarette products may call their local poison control center at: 1-800-222-1222. CDC will continue to advise and alert the public as more information becomes available. Summary What is already known about this topic? Twenty-five states have reported more than 200 possible cases of severe pulmonary disease associated with the use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes). What is added by this report? Based on available information, the disease is likely caused by an unknown chemical exposure; no single product or substance is conclusively linked to the disease. What are the implications for public health practice? Until a definitive cause is known, persons should consider not using e-cigarettes. Those who use e-cigarettes should seek medical attention for any health concerns. Clinicians should report possible cases to their local or state health department.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Characteristics of a Multistate Outbreak of Lung Injury Associated with E-cigarette Use, or Vaping — United States, 2019

              Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes), also called vapes, e-hookas, vape pens, tank systems, mods, and electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), are electronic devices that produce an aerosol by heating a liquid typically containing nicotine, flavorings, and other additives; users inhale this aerosol into their lungs ( 1 ). E-cigarettes also can be used to deliver tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the principal psychoactive component of cannabis ( 1 ). Use of e-cigarettes is commonly called vaping. Lung injury associated with e-cigarette use, or vaping, has recently been reported in most states ( 2 – 4 ). CDC, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), state and local health departments, and others are investigating this outbreak. This report provides data on patterns of the outbreak and characteristics of patients, including sex, age, and selected substances used in e-cigarette, or vaping, products reported to CDC as part of this ongoing multistate investigation. As of September 24, 2019, 46 state health departments and one territorial health department had reported 805 patients with cases of lung injury associated with use of e-cigarette, or vaping, products to CDC. Sixty-nine percent of patients were males, and the median age was 23 years (range = 13–72 years). To date, 12 deaths have been confirmed in 10 states. Among 514 patients with information on substances used in e-cigarettes, or vaping products, in the 30 days preceding symptom onset, 76.9% reported using THC-containing products, and 56.8% reported using nicotine-containing products; 36.0% reported exclusive use of THC-containing products, and 16.0% reported exclusive use of nicotine-containing products. The specific chemical exposure(s) causing the outbreak is currently unknown. While this investigation is ongoing, CDC recommends that persons consider refraining from using e-cigarette, or vaping, products, particularly those containing THC. CDC will continue to work in collaboration with FDA and state and local partners to investigate cases and advise and alert the public on the investigation as additional information becomes available. State health departments, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE), and CDC have developed definitions for confirmed and probable cases* and medical chart abstraction and case interview forms. The case definition, forms, and instructions for reporting cases were disseminated to all state health departments in late August 2019. Patients with cases of lung injury associated with e-cigarette use, or vaping, had 1) a history of e-cigarette use, vaping, or dabbing (vaping concentrated marijuana) within 90 days before symptom onset; 2) imaging studies showing lung injury; 3) absence of evidence of infection (confirmed cases) or infection not thought to be the sole cause of the lung injury or infectious disease testing not performed (probable cases); and 4) absence of alternative plausible diagnoses. Most states are reporting case counts to CDC as case status is determined; however, it can take up to several weeks to complete and submit information from medical chart abstraction and interviews. Additional time might be required after the information is submitted to CDC to clean and standardize data submitted in different formats. This report summarizes patterns of the lung injury outbreak and characteristics of cases reported to CDC, including demographic characteristics and selected substances used by patients. † As of September 24, 2019, 805 cases of lung injury from 46 states and one territory had been reported to CDC (Figure 1). Among the 805 cases reported, basic patient data (i.e., demographics and dates of symptom onset and hospitalization) were received for 771 (96%) patients. Ninety-one percent of patients were hospitalized. Median duration between symptom onset and hospitalization was 6 days (range = 0–158 days) (Figure 2). Although some cases occurred during April–June 2019, the number of cases began increasing in early July. The decline in reporting of onset dates and hospitalizations in the most recent 3–4 weeks is the result, in part, of a lag in reporting; there is no evidence that occurrence of lung injury cases is declining. FIGURE 1 Number of cases of lung injury associated with e-cigarette use, or vaping (n = 805) — United States, including two territories, 2019* Abbreviations: DC = District of Columbia, PR = Puerto Rico; VI = U.S. Virgin Islands. *As of September 24, 2019, 1–9 cases had been reported by 23 states and one territory; 10–29 cases had been reported by 14 states; 30–49 cases had been reported by five states; 50–99 cases had been reported by four states, and 0 cases had been reported by four states and DC. Additional cases being investigated are not reflected on this map. The figure is a U.S. map showing the number of cases of lung injury associated with e-cigarette use, or vaping in each of the 50 states and two territories in 2019. FIGURE 2 Dates of symptom onset (n = 590) and hospital admission (n = 674) among patients with lung injury associated with e-cigarette use, or vaping — United States, March 31–September 21, 2019 The figure is an epidemiologic curve showing the dates of symptom onset and hospital admission among patients with lung injury associated with e-cigarette use, or vaping in the United States, during March 31–September 21, 2019. Sixty-nine percent of patients were male (Table). Median age was 23 years (range = 13–72 years); 61.9% were aged 18–34 years, and 16.2% were aged <18 years. Among the 12 deaths reported to CDC, 58% occurred in men, and the median age was 50 years (range = 27–71 years). Among a subset of 514 patients (63.8%) for whom information on substances used in e-cigarettes, or vaping, products was available, 395 (76.9%) reported using THC-containing products, and 292 (56.8%) reported using nicotine-containing products in the 30 days preceding symptom onset; 210 patients (40.9%) reported using both THC-containing and nicotine-containing products, 185 (36.0%) reported exclusive use of THC-containing products, and 82 (16.0%) reported exclusive use of nicotine-containing products. TABLE Number of patients with lung injury associated with e-cigarette use, or vaping (n = 771), by demographic and substance use characteristics — United States, 2019 Characteristic No. (%) Demographic (n = 771)* Sex Male 531 (68.9) Female 234 (30.4) Missing 6 (0.8) Age group (yrs) <18 125 (16.2) 18–24 293 (38.0) 25–34 184 (23.9) 35–44 93 (12.1) ≥45 42 (5.5) Missing 34 (4.4) Substances used in e-cigarette, or vaping, products (n = 514)† THC-containing products Yes 395 (76.9) No 96 (18.7) Unknown/Missing 23 (4.5) Nicotine-containing products Yes 292 (56.8) No 173(33.7) Unknown/Missing 49 (9.5) Cannabidiol (CBD) Yes 89 (17.3) No 265 (51.6) Unknown/Missing 160 (31.1) Synthetic cannabinoids Yes 4 (0.8) No 289 (56.2) Unknown/Missing 221 (43.0) Flavored e-liquids § Yes 102 (19.8) No 132 (25.7) Unknown/Missing 280 (54.5) Abbreviation: THC = tetrahydrocannabinol. * Patients for whom basic demographic information was submitted to CDC. † Patients for whom information was available on use of either nicotine-containing or THC-containing substances. § Flavored products that contain water, food-grade flavoring, propylene glycol, vegetable glycerin, nicotine, THC, or CBD. Discussion E-cigarettes were introduced to the U.S. market in 2007 ( 1 ). In 2018, 20.8% of high school students reported current e-cigarette use ( 5 ). E-cigarette use is markedly lower among U.S. adults than among youths; in 2018, only 3.2% of adults currently used e-cigarettes, with higher prevalences among persons aged 18–24 years (7.6%) and 25–34 years (5.4%) than among older age groups ( 6 ). Approximately three fourths of patients in this investigation were aged <35 years. In the general U.S. adult population, current e-cigarette use is slightly higher among males than females for both adults and youths ( 6 ); in the present investigation, approximately seven in 10 cases occurred in males. In this investigation, 62% of patients were aged 18–34 years; this is consistent with the age group with highest reported prevalence of marijuana use in the preceding 30 days in the United States ( 7 ). THC-containing and nicotine-containing products were the most commonly reported substances used in e-cigarettes, or vaping products, by patients. Specific data on use of THC in e-cigarettes, or vaping products, in the general population is limited; among U.S. middle and high school students in 2016 who had ever used an e-cigarette, 30.6% reported using THC in an e-cigarette (33.3% among males and 27.2% among females) ( 8 ). Among adults who reported using marijuana in 2014, 9.9% reported consuming it via a vaporizer or other electronic device (11.5% among men and 7.8% among women) ( 9 ). In a recent study of college students, approximately 75% of those who had used substances other than nicotine in e-cigarettes reported using marijuana or THC-containing products in an e-cigarette ( 10 ). Because information about substance use in this investigation was self-reported, the information is not available for some cases because of the time required for completing and reporting patient interviews, inability to conduct interviews (e.g., patient refusal, loss to follow-up, persons who were too ill or died before they could be interviewed) and missing data for certain variables (e.g., patient refusal to answer certain questions). In addition, patients might not always know what substances they use or might be hesitant to reveal use of substances that are not legal in their state. Continued monitoring of patient case counts and characteristics, as well as substances used with e-cigarette, or vaping, products, is critical to informing the ongoing investigation and helping to identify the cause. CDC and state health departments continue to collect and analyze epidemiologic data to better understand what types of devices and products patients are using (e.g., cartridges and e-liquids), the source of products or location where they were obtained, and the patterns (e.g., duration and frequency) of specific product use. Given the vast number of chemicals used in e-cigarette, or vaping, products, it is important to link epidemiologic data with findings from laboratory analyses of products and clinical specimens from patients. Federal, state, and private laboratories are working to collect and analyze products obtained from patients with lung injury associated with e-cigarette use, or vaping. In addition, CDC, clinical, and public health laboratories are collecting clinical specimens for future targeted analyses of substances identified in product samples. The specific chemical exposure(s) causing this outbreak is unknown at this time. National data to date show that most lung injury patients with data on substance use report using THC-containing products with or without nicotine-containing products, although some patients report using only nicotine-containing products. While this investigation is ongoing, CDC recommends that persons consider refraining from using e-cigarette, or vaping, products, particularly those containing THC. Persons who continue to use e-cigarettes or vaping products should carefully monitor themselves and seek medical attention immediately if they have symptoms consistent with those described in this outbreak. § Regardless of the investigation, e-cigarettes, or vaping products, should never be used by youths, young adults, pregnant women, or by adults who do not currently use tobacco products ( 2 ). Adults who use e-cigarettes because they have quit smoking should not return to smoking combustible cigarettes. In addition, persons who use e-cigarettes or vaping products should not get them from informal sources or off the street and should not modify e-cigarette, or vaping, devices or add any substances that are not intended by the manufacturer. Both THC-containing and nicotine-containing e-cigarette, or vaping, products purchased legally within states might also contain harmful substances ( 1 ); it is difficult for consumers to know what is in these products, and full ingredient lists are typically not available. THC use has been associated with a wide range of health effects, particularly with prolonged heavy use. ¶ The best way to avoid potentially harmful effects is to not use THC, including through e-cigarette, or vaping, devices. Persons with marijuana use disorder should seek evidence-based treatment by a health care provider. This investigation is ongoing. CDC will continue to work in collaboration with FDA and state and local partners to investigate cases and advise and alert the public on the investigation as additional information becomes available. Summary What is already known about this topic? Lung injury associated with e-cigarette use, or vaping, has recently been reported in most states. CDC, the Food and Drug Administration, and others are investigating this outbreak. What is added by this report? Among 805 cases reported as of September 24, 2019, 69% were in males; 62% of patients were aged 18–34 years. Among patients with data on substances used in e-cigarettes, or vaping products, tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-containing product use was reported by 76.9% (36.0% reported exclusive THC-product use); 56.8% reported nicotine-containing product use (16.0% reported exclusive nicotine-product use). What are the implications for public health practice? The cause of the outbreak is unknown. While this investigation is ongoing, CDC recommends that persons consider refraining from using e-cigarette, or vaping, products, particularly those containing THC.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
                MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep
                WR
                Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
                Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
                0149-2195
                1545-861X
                18 October 2019
                18 October 2019
                : 68
                : 41
                : 919-927
                Affiliations
                National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC; Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, CDC; Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; National Center for Environmental Health, CDC; National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC; Epidemic Intelligence Service, CDC; National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, CDC; National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, CDC; National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, CDC; National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, CDC; General Dynamics Information Technology; National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC.
                , Pediatric Pulmonary Medicine, Children’s Minnesota
                Emory University
                Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
                Nationwide Children’s Hospital and The Ohio State University
                Department of Pediatrics, Division of Respiratory Medicine
                UT Southwestern Medical Center
                Intermountain Healthcare
                University of Washington and Seattle Children’s Hospital
                University of Utah
                Office of the Director, Deputy Director for Non-Infectious Diseases, CDC
                Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, CDC
                National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC
                National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
                National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC
                Office of Minority Health and Health Equity, CDC
                National Center for Environmental Health, CDC
                National Center for Health Statistics, CDC
                National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, CDC
                National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, CDC
                Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, CDC and Emory University School of Medicine
                Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
                National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
                Illinois Department of Public Health
                Wisconsin Department of Health Services
                Eagle Medical Services
                Northrop Grumman
                G2S Corporation
                Student Worksite Program volunteer
                Student Worksite Experience Program volunteer
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: David A. Siegel, dsiegel@ 123456cdc.gov , 770-488-4426.
                Article
                mm6841e3
                10.15585/mmwr.mm6841e3
                6802682
                31633675
                cad5dc71-4780-45fe-80df-ca7994f7fca6

                All material in the MMWR Series is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without permission; citation as to source, however, is appreciated.

                History
                Categories
                Full Report

                Comments

                Comment on this article