22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Review article: systemic treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          The approval of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib in 2007 marked a milestone in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, as sorafenib was the first systemic therapy to show a survival benefit in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Since then many drugs failed in the first‐ and second‐line setting and it took almost another decade until further tyrosine kinase inhibitors succeeded in phase III trials.

          Aim

          To summarise the evolving field of systemic therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma.

          Methods

          We reviewed recently published studies identified from PubMed and data presented at recent meetings. Main search terms included hepatocellular carcinoma, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immunotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, sorafenib, regorafenib, lenvatinib, cabozantinib, ramucirumab, and nivolumab.

          Results

          We discuss the evolution of targeted therapies since the approval of sorafenib including failures and recent advances. We also elaborate the unmet need of biomarkers to guide treatment decisions and discuss the emerging field of immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma.

          Conclusions

          The tyrosine kinase inhibitors sorafenib (first line) and regorafenib (second line) have been approved for hepatocellular carcinoma, and the immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab obtained conditional approval for sorafenib‐experienced patients in the United States. With lenvatinib in the first line, and cabozantinib and ramucirumab in sorafenib‐experienced patients, three more targeted therapies reached their primary endpoint in phase III trials and may soon be added to the treatment armamentarium.

          Related collections

          Most cited references73

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Adjuvant sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma after resection or ablation (STORM): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

          There is no standard of care for adjuvant therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. This trial was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of sorafenib versus placebo as adjuvant therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after surgical resection or local ablation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            High-dimensional single-cell analysis predicts response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ramucirumab versus placebo as second-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma following first-line therapy with sorafenib (REACH): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial.

              VEGF and VEGF receptor-2-mediated angiogenesis contribute to hepatocellular carcinoma pathogenesis. Ramucirumab is a recombinant IgG1 monoclonal antibody and VEGF receptor-2 antagonist. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of ramucirumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma following first-line therapy with sorafenib.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                matthias.pinter@meduniwien.ac.at
                markus@peck.at
                Journal
                Aliment Pharmacol Ther
                Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2036
                APT
                Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0269-2813
                1365-2036
                23 July 2018
                September 2018
                : 48
                : 6 ( doiID: 10.1111/apt.2018.48.issue-6 )
                : 598-609
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology Department of Internal Medicine III Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
                [ 2 ] Liver Cancer (HCC) Study Group Vienna Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
                [ 3 ] Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology (IMuG) Hepatology, Endocrinology, Rheumatology & Nephrology Central Emergency Medicine (ZAE) Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee Klagenfurt Austria
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence: Matthias Pinter, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Gürtel 18‐20, A‐1090 Vienna, Austria ( matthias.pinter@ 123456meduniwien.ac.at ) and Markus Peck‐Radosavljevic, Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology (IMuG), Hepatology, Endocrinology, Rheumatology & Nephrology, Central Emergency Medicine (ZAE), Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Feschnigstraße 11, 9020 Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Austria ( markus@ 123456peck.at )
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7260-532X
                Article
                APT14913
                10.1111/apt.14913
                6120553
                30039640
                caddac84-aaef-4d62-8cd3-53c852fbc53e
                © 2018 The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 16 May 2018
                : 04 June 2018
                : 28 June 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, Pages: 12, Words: 9883
                Categories
                Review Article
                Review Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                apt14913
                September 2018
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:version=5.4.7.1 mode:remove_FC converted:03.09.2018

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article